An Analysis of Sample Attrition in the PSES Panel Data
Panel household surveys study the dynamics for individual households, including their well-being, child schooling, and labour market dynamics, and they can also be used to observe who benefits or loses from general economic development. The MIMAP panel survey, covering 300 households in 60 districts, is the largest panel survey carried out in Pakistan. This paper addresses two very legitimate concerns regarding the panel data? the extent of attrition and the degree to which attrition is non-random. The paper describes in detail the factors responsible for attrition in this panel at the provincial as well as the urban-rural levels. The paper first examines the extent of attrition and then differentiates the characteristics of the attriting household from the non-attriting household, and how this attrition affects the coefficients of standard background variables. It shows that attrition was higher among the poorest households as measured by the per capita expenditures. However, no significant difference could be found between the set of coefficients for attritors versus non-attritors for indicators of interest, i.e. consumption and poverty. This shows that coefficient estimates of standard background variables are not affected by sample attrition, implying that an attrition of more than 22 percent sample of PSES is not a serious problem for obtaining consistent estimates. This analysis of the extent and nature of PSES panel attrition suggests that researchers can use this panel data set with confidence to explore the dynamic relationship in Pakistan. It also indicates clearly that it is worth investing in another round of the PSES panel.
|Date of creation:||2006|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.pide.org.pk
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Sean Becketti & William Gould & Lee Lillard & Finis Welch, 1985. "The Panel Study of Income Dynamics After Fourteen Years: An Evaluation," UCLA Economics Working Papers 361, UCLA Department of Economics.
- G. M. Arif & Syed Mubashir Ali & Zafar Mueen Nasir & Nabeela Arshad, 2001.
"An Introduction to the 1998-99 Pakistan Socioeconomic Survey (PSES),"
MIMAP Technical Paper Series
2001:04, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
- G. M., Arif & Syed, Mubashir Ali & Nasir, Zafar Mueen & Arshad, Nabeela, 2001. "An introduction to the 1998-99 Pakistan socioeconomic survey (PSES)," MPRA Paper 36499, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- G. M. Arif & Faiz Bilquees, 2006.
"Chronic and Transitory Poverty in Pakistan: Evidence from a Longitudinal Household Survey,"
MIMAP Technical Paper Series
2006:19, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
- G. M. Arif & Faiz Bilquees, 2007. "Chronic and Transitory Poverty in Pakistan: Evidence from a Longitudinal Household Survey," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 111-127.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:mimaps:2006:20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Khurram Iqbal)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.