IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/cy2s3_v1.html

Disruption or Augmentation? The Changing Demand for AI Skills in the Age of Generative AI

Author

Listed:
  • Binelli, Chiara
  • Luca, Teresa
  • Vergolini, Loris

    (University of Bologna)

  • Marconi, Gabriele

Abstract

We study how the introduction of generative AI (GPT-3) has impacted the demand for AI-related skills in the European labour market. Using a novel large-scale collection of online job advertisements in in twenty two European Union countries and the United Kingdom, we develop a detailed classification of AI skills and tasks, and we exploit the release of GPT-3 in November 2022 as a natural experiment and apply a difference-in-differences estimation to assess the shifts in the demand for AI skills for occupations that are exposed to ChatGPT relative to not-exposed occupations. We find that GPT-3 had a negative and statistically significant impact on the share of AI job ads for occupations in the treated group relative to the control group, so that the availability of generative AI decreased the demand for occupations whose most frequent core task is automatable through ChatGPT. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper that proposes a detailed classification framework and robust identification strategy to study the impact of generative AI on labour demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Binelli, Chiara & Luca, Teresa & Vergolini, Loris & Marconi, Gabriele, 2026. "Disruption or Augmentation? The Changing Demand for AI Skills in the Age of Generative AI," SocArXiv cy2s3_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:cy2s3_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/cy2s3_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/69aa9b773fc88b4824e7d81f/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/cy2s3_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & David Autor & Jonathon Hazell & Pascual Restrepo, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence and Jobs: Evidence from Online Vacancies," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(S1), pages 293-340.
    2. Teutloff, Ole & Einsiedler, Johanna & Kässi, Otto & Braesemann, Fabian & Mishkin, Pamela & del Rio-Chanona, R. Maria, 2025. "Winners and losers of generative AI: Early Evidence of Shifts in Freelancer Demand," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    3. Carlo Pizzinelli & Augustus J Panton & Ms. Marina Mendes Tavares & Mauro Cazzaniga & Longji Li, 2023. "Labor Market Exposure to AI: Cross-country Differences and Distributional Implications," IMF Working Papers 2023/216, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Francesca Borgonovi & Justine Hervé & Helke Seitz, 2023. "Not lost in translation: The implications of machine translation technologies for language professionals and for broader society," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 291, OECD Publishing.
    5. George Stalidis & Selini Kyriazidou, 2024. "Job Role Description and Skill Matching in a Rapidly Changing Labor Market Using Knowledge Engineering," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Androniki Kavoura & Teresa Borges-Tiago & Flavio Tiago (ed.), Strategic Innovative Marketing and Tourism, pages 185-193, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Demombynes, Gabriel & Langbein, Jorg Gero & Weber, Michael, 2025. "The Exposure of Workers to Artificial Intelligence in Low- and Middle-Income Countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11057, The World Bank.
    2. Christian Gschwendt & Claudio Schilter, 2026. "Automation in the Wake of GenAI: Implications for Firm Training," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0252, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    3. Garcia-Suaza, Andrés & Sarango-Iturralde, Alexander & Caiza-Guamán, Pamela & Gil Díaz, Mateo & Acosta Castillo, Dana, 2025. "Unequal Impacts of AI on Colombia's Labor Market: An Analysis of AI Exposure, Wages, and Job Dynamics," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1604, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    4. Tiziano Ropele & Alex Tagliabracci, 2026. "The economic impact of artificial intelligence: evidence from Italian firms," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 1005, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    5. Nathalie Greenan & Dario Guarascio & Jelena Reljic, 2025. "AI and the labour market: opening the black box," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 925-951, December.
    6. Ciaschi, Matias & Falcone, Guillermo & Garganta, Santiago & Gasparini, Leonardo & Bertín, Octavio & Ramírez-Leira, Lucía, 2025. "The Potential Distributive Impact of AI-driven Labor Changes in Latin America," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 14253, Inter-American Development Bank.
    7. Philippe Aghion & Simon Bunel & Xavier Jaravel & Thomas Mikaelsen & Alexandra Roulet & Jakob Søgaard, 2025. "How Different Uses of AI Shape Labor Demand: Evidence from France," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 115, pages 62-67, May.
    8. Emilio Colombo & Fabio Mercorio & Mario Mezzanzanica & Antonio Serino, 2024. "Towards the Terminator Economy: Assessing Job Exposure to AI through LLMs," DISEIS - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo dis2401, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo (DISEIS).
    9. Gao, Jie & Li, Zhizhuo & Nguyen, Thithuha & Zhang, Wentao, 2025. "Digital transformation and enterprise employment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Kirtac, Kemal & Germano, Guido, 2024. "Sentiment trading with large language models," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    11. Hakan Yilmazkuday, 2025. "Artificial intelligence and labor markets: evidence from google trends," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 49(4), pages 1078-1093, December.
    12. Marydas, Sneha & Mathew, Nanditha & De Marzo, Giordano & Pietrobelli, Carlo, 2025. "Digital Technologies, Hiring, Training, and Firm Outcomes," MERIT Working Papers 2025-004, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    13. Chen, Xilu & Ge, Erqi & Xu, Xianxiang & Zhou, Quan, 2025. "Does digitalization of government activities improve business environment? The influence of public service standardization," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 533-560.
    14. Enrico Maria Fenoaltea & Dario Mazzilli & Aurelio Patelli & Angelica Sbardella & Andrea Tacchella & Andrea Zaccaria & Marco Trombetti & Luciano Pietronero, 2024. "Follow the money: a startup-based measure of AI exposure across occupations, industries and regions," Papers 2412.04924, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    15. Naomi Hausman & Oren Rigbi & Sarit Weisburd, 2025. "Generative AI’s Impact on Student Achievement and Implications for Worker Productivity," CESifo Working Paper Series 11843, CESifo.
    16. Pawel Gmyrek & Janine Berg & David Bescond, 2025. "Generative AI and Jobs: An Analysis of Potential Effects on Global Employment," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 6-30.
    17. Cao, Sean & Jiang, Wei & Wang, Junbo & Yang, Baozhong, 2024. "From Man vs. Machine to Man + Machine: The art and AI of stock analyses," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    18. Martin Lábaj & Tomáš Oleš & Gabriel Procházka, 2025. "Impact of robots and artificial intelligence on labor and skill demand: evidence from the UK," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 953-1001, December.
    19. Anastasios Evgenidis & Apostolos Fasianos, 2025. "AI news shocks and the macroeconomy: evidence from UK patent data," IFS Working Papers W25/48, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    20. Standaert, Thomas & Andries, Petra, 2026. "Overcoming difficulties in knowledge transfer: Harnessing the power of AI to drive process innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:cy2s3_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.