IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/a9dxb_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A family of accessibility measures derived from spatial interaction principles

Author

Listed:
  • Soukhov, Anastasia
  • Pereira, Rafael H. M.
  • Higgins, Christopher D.
  • Paez, Antonio

Abstract

Transportation planning has long prioritized the efficiency of movement, or mobility. However, the concept of accessibility represents a more comprehensive evolution, shifting focus from mere movement to the potential to reach (i.e., spatially interact) with desired destinations. Despite growing recognition of accessibility-based planning approaches, the concept remains fragmented, with inconsistent definitions and unclear interpretations. This work's aim is to clarify and unify the concept of accessibility by connecting it into spatial interaction modeling. We demonstrate that widely used mobility and accessibility models, such as gravity-based accessibility and spatial interaction models, share common theoretical roots. From this foundation, this paper offers three contributions: (A) we introduce a family of accessibility measures within the principles of spatial interaction, and (B) formally define four members of the family, namely the 'unconstrained' measure (i.e., Hansen-type accessibility), the 'total constrained' measure (i.e., a constrained version of the Hansen-type accessibility), the 'singly constrained' measure (i.e., related to the popular two step floating catchment approach - 2SFCA), and the 'doubly constrained' measure representing realized interactions or 'access', effectively equal to the doubly constrained spatial interaction model; and (C) we demonstrate the interpretability advantages of the family, as these constrained accessibility measures yield values in units of the number of potential "opportunities for spatial interaction" or "population for spatial interaction" for each zone and zonal flow. The family of accessibility measures proposed here clarifies the concept of 'potential' in accessibility, demonstrates theoretical and formulaic linkages across popular accessibility and spatial interaction models, and reintroduces measurement units into accessibility measures. By doing so, we believe this family of measures can unlock a clearer, more interpretable, and cohesive foundation for accessibility analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Soukhov, Anastasia & Pereira, Rafael H. M. & Higgins, Christopher D. & Paez, Antonio, 2025. "A family of accessibility measures derived from spatial interaction principles," OSF Preprints a9dxb_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:a9dxb_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/a9dxb_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/682e32307ee3cec44eb06cd8/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/a9dxb_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Alonso & M. Beamonte & P. Gargallo & M. Salvador, 2014. "Labour and residential accessibility: a Bayesian analysis based on Poisson gravity models with spatial effects," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 409-439, October.
    2. Pereira, Rafael H.M. & Braga, Carlos Kauê Vieira & Servo, Luciana Mendes & Serra, Bernardo & Amaral, Pedro & Gouveia, Nelson & Paez, Antonio, 2021. "Geographic access to COVID-19 healthcare in Brazil using a balanced float catchment area approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    3. Aura Reggiani & Juan Martín, 2011. "Guest Editorial: New Frontiers in Accessibility Modelling: An Introduction," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 577-580, December.
    4. Qisheng Pan, 2013. "The impacts of an urban light rail system on residential property values: a case study of the Houston METRORail transit line," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 145-169, April.
    5. Shen, Yao, 2019. "Segregation through space: A scope of the flow-based spatial interaction model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 10-23.
    6. Chia, Jason & Lee, Jinwoo (Brian), 2020. "Extending public transit accessibility models to recognise transfer location," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Roger Vickerman & Klaus Spiekermann & Michael Wegener, 1999. "Accessibility and Economic Development in Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 1-15.
    8. Wachs, Martin & Kumagai, T. Gordon, 1973. "Physical accessibility as a social indicator," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 7(5), pages 437-456, October.
    9. Lavery, T.A. & Páez, A. & Kanaroglou, P.S., 2013. "Driving out of choices: An investigation of transport modality in a university sample," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 37-46.
    10. R W Vickerman, 1974. "Accessibility, Attraction, and Potential: A Review of Some Concepts and Their Use in Determining Mobility," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 6(6), pages 675-691, December.
    11. Beaumont, John R., 1981. "Location-allocation problems in a plane a review of some models," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 217-229.
    12. Elena López & Javier Gutiérrez & Gabriel Gómez, 2008. "Measuring Regional Cohesion Effects of Large-scale Transport Infrastructure Investments: An Accessibility Approach," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 277-301, February.
    13. Jasper Willigers & Han Floor & Bert van Wee, 2007. "Accessibility Indicators for Location Choices of Offices: An Application to the Intraregional Distributive Effects of High-Speed Rail in the Netherlands," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(9), pages 2086-2898, September.
    14. Farber, Steven & Páez, Antonio, 2011. "Running to stay in place: the time-use implications of automobile oriented land-use and travel," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 782-793.
    15. Eric J. Miller, 2018. "Accessibility: measurement and application in transportation planning," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 551-555, September.
    16. Henrike Rau & Amaya Vega, 2012. "Spatial (Im)mobility and Accessibility in I reland: Implications for Transport Policy," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 667-696, December.
    17. Anastasia Soukhov & Javier Tarriño-Ortiz & Julio A Soria-Lara & Antonio Páez, 2024. "Multimodal spatial availability: A singly-constrained measure of accessibility considering multiple modes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-23, February.
    18. Rojas, Carolina & Páez, Antonio & Barbosa, Olga & Carrasco, Juan, 2016. "Accessibility to urban green spaces in Chilean cities using adaptive thresholds," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 227-240.
    19. Tao, Zhuolin & Zhou, Jiangping & Lin, Xiongbin & Chao, Heng & Li, Guicai, 2020. "Investigating the impacts of public transport on job accessibility in Shenzhen, China: a multi-modal approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    20. Anastasia Soukhov & Antonio Páez & Christopher D Higgins & Moataz Mohamed, 2023. "Introducing spatial availability, a singly-constrained measure of competitive accessibility," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-30, January.
    21. Su, Rongxiang & Goulias, Konstadinos, 2023. "Untangling the relationships among residential environment, destination choice, and daily walk accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    22. Ribeiro, Anabela & Antunes, António Pais & Páez, Antonio, 2010. "Road accessibility and cohesion in lagging regions: Empirical evidence from Portugal based on spatial econometric models," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 125-132.
    23. Merlin, Louis A. & Hu, Lingqian, 2017. "Does competition matter in measures of job accessibility? Explaining employment in Los Angeles," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 77-88.
    24. Ana Condeço-Melhorado & Panayotis Christidis, 2018. "Road Accessibility in Border Regions: a Joint Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 363-383, June.
    25. Esra Suel & Claude Lynch & Maria Wood & Tom Murat & Gerard Casey & Adam Dennett, 2024. "Measuring transport-associated urban inequalities: Where are we and where do we go from here?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 1235-1257, November.
    26. Leonardi, Giorgio & Tadei, Roberto, 1984. "Random utility demand models and service location," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 399-431, August.
    27. Silva, Cecília & Bertolini, Luca & te Brömmelstroet, Marco & Milakis, Dimitris & Papa, Enrica, 2017. "Accessibility instruments in planning practice: Bridging the implementation gap," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 135-145.
    28. Kevin Manaugh & Ahmed El-Geneidy, 2012. "What makes travel 'local': Defining and understanding local travel behaviour," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 5(3), pages 15-27.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosik, Piotr & Pomianowski, Wojciech & Komornicki, Tomasz & Goliszek, Sławomir & Szejgiec-Kolenda, Barbara & Duma, Patryk, 2020. "Regional dispersion of potential accessibility quotient at the intra-European and intranational level. Core-periphery pattern, discontinuity belts and distance decay tornado effect," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. repec:elg:eechap:14395_20 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Mengying Cui & David Levinson, 2020. "Primal and Dual Access," Working Papers 2022-01, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    4. Soukhov, Anastasia & Mooney, Nicholas & Ravensbergen, Léa, 2025. "Exploring mobility of care with measures of accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    5. Mengying Cui & David Levinson, 2019. "Measuring Full Cost Accessibility by Auto," Working Papers 2019-02, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    6. Fayyaz, S. Kiavash & Liu, Xiaoyue Cathy & Porter, Richard J., 2017. "Dynamic transit accessibility and transit gap causality analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 27-39.
    7. Nir Kaplan & Itzhak Omer, 2022. "Multiscale Accessibility—A New Perspective of Space Structuration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Mengying Cui & David Levinson, 2020. "Multi-Activity Access: How Activity Choice Affects Opportunity," Working Papers 2022-01, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    9. Kaniz Fatima & Sara Moridpour & Chris De Gruyter & Tayebeh Saghapour, 2020. "Elderly Sustainable Mobility: Scientific Paper Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Rayaprolu, Hema & Levinson, David, 2024. "Co-evolution of public transport access and ridership," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    11. Mengying Cui & David Levinson, 2018. "Accessibility analysis of risk severity," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1029-1050, July.
    12. Daniel Oviedo & Lynn Scholl & Marco Innao & Lauramaria Pedraza, 2019. "Do Bus Rapid Transit Systems Improve Accessibility to Job Opportunities for the Poor? The Case of Lima, Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    13. Maria Teresa Borzacchiello & Peter Nijkamp & Eric Koomen, 2010. "Accessibility and Urban Development: A Grid-Based Comparative Statistical Analysis of Dutch Cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(1), pages 148-169, February.
    14. Dong, Xiaojing & Ben-Akiva, Moshe E. & Bowman, John L. & Walker, Joan L., 2006. "Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 163-180, February.
    15. Luz, Gregório & Barboza, Matheus H.C. & Portugal, Licinio & Giannotti, Mariana & van Wee, Bert, 2022. "Does better accessibility help to reduce social exclusion? Evidence from the city of São Paulo, Brazil," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 186-217.
    16. Elizondo-Candanedo, Raúl F. & Arranz-López, Aldo & Soria-Lara, Julio A. & Páez, Antonio, 2024. "When e-activities meet spatial accessibility: A theoretical framework and empirical space-time thresholds for simulated spatial settings," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    17. Ryan, Jean & Martens, Karel, 2023. "Defining and implementing a sufficient level of accessibility: What’s stopping us?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    18. Cui, Mengying & Yu, Lijie & Nie, Shaoyu & Dai, Zhe & Ge, Ying-en & Levinson, David, 2025. "How do access and spatial dependency shape metro passenger flows," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    19. Rezaei, Nazanin & Todd-Blick, Annika & Fujita, K. Sydny & Popovich, Natalie & Needell, Zachary & Poliziani, Cristian & Caicedo, Juan David & Guirado, Carlos & Spurlock, C. Anna, 2024. "At the nexus of equity and transportation modeling: Assessing accessibility through the Individual Experienced Utility-Based Synthesis (INEXUS) metric," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    20. Luz, Gregorio & Barboza, Matheus Henrique Cunha & da Silva Portugal, Licinio & Giannotti, Mariana & van Wee, Bert, 2022. "Does better accessibility help to reduce social exclusion? Evidence from the City of São Paulo, Brazil," SocArXiv 2p896, Center for Open Science.
    21. Cao, Jing & Liu, Xiaoyue Cathy & Wang, Yinhai & Li, Qingquan, 2013. "Accessibility impacts of China’s high-speed rail network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 12-21.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:a9dxb_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.