IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/9bvdy.html

Mapping Pivotal Issues of Collective Action Research: Scientometrics Analysis of Publications

Author

Listed:
  • Rahmat, Al Fauzi

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the terms related to collective action research and to identify their evolution and change in the decades from 1992, when the first publication appeared in the Scopus database, to the present. Past scholars have examined collective action in several fields of research, but the breakthrough paper using scientometrics has not been found. Therefore, this paper is an original to clarify the work within terms based on selected keywords from collective action research, and it yielded 1150 articles. To demonstrate, we used a scientometrics approach of the VOSViewer tool for data visualization. The findings indicate that the concern of collective action has attracted experts to generate various points of view for research, and we forecast that this study will become increasingly noticeable in the coming few years since it was explored. Importantly, we recorded co-authorship and network collaboration, citation by some point of view, as well as annual current issues of collective action. Moreover, we exhibited terms that scholars used to conduct collective action research, such as leadership, legitimacy, solidarity, resilience, capacity-building, advocacy, regulation, accountability, power, and trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahmat, Al Fauzi, 2023. "Mapping Pivotal Issues of Collective Action Research: Scientometrics Analysis of Publications," OSF Preprints 9bvdy, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:9bvdy
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/9bvdy
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/63e0c51b1e9686064eb26f67/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/9bvdy?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meinzen-Dick, Ruth & Raju, K. V. & Gulati, Ashok, 2002. "What Affects Organization and Collective Action for Managing Resources? Evidence from Canal Irrigation Systems in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 649-666, April.
    2. Kimberly Pugel & Amy Javernick-Will & Matthew Koschmann & Shawn Peabody & Karl Linden, 2020. "Adapting Collaborative Approaches for Service Provision to Low-Income Countries: Expert Panel Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, March.
    3. Chad S. Boda & David O’Byrne & David Harnesk & Turaj Faran & Ellinor Isgren, 2022. "A collective alternative to the Inward Turn in environmental sustainability research," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(2), pages 291-297, June.
    4. Johan Colding & Stephan Barthel & Robert Ljung & Felix Eriksson & Stefan Sjöberg, 2022. "Urban Commons and Collective Action to Address Climate Change," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 103-114.
    5. Edgar E. Twine & Elizaphan J. O. Rao & Isabelle Baltenweck & Amos O. Omore, 2019. "Are Technology Adoption and Collective Action Important in Accessing Credit? Evidence from Milk Producers in Tanzania," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(3), pages 388-412, July.
    6. Ruth Shortall & Anna Mengolini & Flavia Gangale, 2022. "Citizen Engagement in EU Collective Action Energy Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    7. Maruyama, Takao & Kageyama, Akiko & Kunieda, Nobuhiro, 2022. "Region-wide initiative to expand girls’ enrollment in primary education in Niger: A case of collective impact for educational development," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Beatriz Carmona-Moya & Antonia Calvo-Salguero & María-del-Carmen Aguilar-Luzón, 2021. "EIMECA: A Proposal for a Model of Environmental Collective Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Matthew C. Nowlin, 2022. "Who should “do more” about climate change? Cultural theory, polycentricity, and public support for climate change actions across actors and governments," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(4), pages 468-485, July.
    10. Turiansky, Abbie, 2021. "Collective action in games as in life: Experimental evidence from canal cleaning in Haiti," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Hotte, Ngaio & Kozak, Robert & Wyatt, Stephen, 2019. "How institutions shape trust during collective action: A case study of forest governance on Haida Gwaii," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Fang, Ximeng & Freyer, Timo & Ho, Chui-Yee & Chen, Zihua & Goette, Lorenz, 2022. "Prosociality predicts individual behavior and collective outcomes in the COVID-19 pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    13. Larson, Anne M. & Sarmiento Barletti, Juan Pablo & Heise Vigil, Nicole, 2022. "A place at the table is not enough: Accountability for Indigenous Peoples and local communities in multi-stakeholder platforms," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:osfxxx:9bvdy_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. S.T, Pavan Kumar & Lahiri, Biswajit, 2023. "Conditional selection of multifactor evidence for the levels of anaemia among women of reproductive age group," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Man Teng & Longzhen Ni & Hua Li & Wenhui Chen, 2025. "Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Saline–Alkali Land Consolidation Based on the Optimal Land Use Value: Evidence from Jilin Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Xenarios, Stefanos & Amarasinghe, Upali A. & Sharma, Bharat R., 2011. "Valuating agricultural water use and ecological services in agrarian economies: evidences from eastern India," IWMI Reports 158839, International Water Management Institute.
    5. Pardey, Philip G. & Alston, Julian M. & Chan-Kang, Connie & Magalhaes, Eduardo & Vosti, Stephen A., 2002. "Assessing and attributing the benefits from varietal improvement research: evidence from Embrapa, Brazil," EPTD discussion papers 95, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Fabrício Gonçalves & Renato Ribeiro & Raimundo Costa & Julien Burte, 2015. "A Management Analysis Tool for Emancipated and Public Irrigation Areas Using Neural Networks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(7), pages 2393-2406, May.
    7. Rantala, Salla & Swallow, Brent & Paloniemi, Riikka & Raitanen, Elina, 2020. "Governance of forests and governance of forest information: Interlinkages in the age of open and digital data," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. Kuzdas, Christopher & Wiek, Arnim & Warner, Benjamin & Vignola, Raffaele & Morataya, Ricardo, 2015. "Integrated and Participatory Analysis of Water Governance Regimes: The Case of the Costa Rican Dry Tropics," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 254-268.
    9. Andersson, Krister & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. & Nehring, Ryan & Zhang, Wei, 2024. "Why do multistakeholder processes emerge and flourish? Identifying and operationalizing the leading hypotheses," IFPRI discussion papers 2312, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Kevin W. Maina & Martin C. Parlasca & Elizaphan J. O. Rao & Matin Qaim, 2024. "Farmer‐friendly delivery of veterinary services: Experimental insights from the Kenyan dairy sector," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 829-846, September.
    11. Kherallah, Mylene & Kirsten, Johann F, 2002. "The New Institutional Economics: Applications For Agricultural Policy Research In Developing Countries," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 41(2).
    12. Siegwart Lindenberg, 2014. "Sustainable cooperation needs tinkering with both rules and social motivation," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 71-81, April.
    13. Cavalcanti, Carina & Engel, Stefanie & Leibbrandt, Andreas, 2013. "Social integration, participation, and community resource management," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 262-276.
    14. Yasuyuki Sawada & Ryuji Kasahara & Keitaro Aoyagi & Masahiro Shoji & Mika Ueyama, 2013. "Modes of Collective Action in Village Economies: Evidence from Natural and Artefactual Field Experiments in a Developing Country," Asian Development Review, MIT Press, vol. 30(1), pages 31-51, March.
    15. Takashi Kurosaki, 2006. "Community and Economic Development in Pakistan: The Case of Citizen Community Boards in Hafizabad and a Japanese Perspectives," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 45(4), pages 575-585.
    16. Vesna Mrdalj, 2017. "Structure and Determinants of Intra-Industry Trade in Agro -Food Sector of Bosnia and Herzegovina," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, ejis_v3_i.
    17. Gunasekara, Udeni & Korale-Gedara, Pradeepa & Gunathilaka, Dayani, 2023. "Preferences of inland fishers for different management attributes in village tank cascade systems in Sri Lanka," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    18. Sirak Bahta & Amos Omore & Darek Baker & Iheanacho Okike & Berhanu Gebremedhin & Francis Wanyoike, 2021. "An Analysis of Technical Efficiency in the Presence of Developments Toward Commercialization: Evidence from Tanzania’s Milk Producers," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(3), pages 502-525, June.
    19. Mijailoff, Julián Daniel & Giessen, Lukas & Burns, Sarah Lilian, 2023. "Local to global escalation of land use conflicts: Long-term dynamics on social movements protests against pulp mills and plantation forests in Argentina and Uruguay," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    20. van Soest, Daan & Stoop, Jan & Vyrastekova, Jana, 2016. "Toward a delineation of the circumstances in which cooperation can be sustained in environmental and resource problems," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-13.
    21. Willy, Daniel Kyalo & Holm-Müller, Karin, 2013. "Social influence and collective action effects on farm level soil conservation effort in rural Kenya," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 94-103.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:9bvdy. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.