IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Welfare Reforms and the Living Standards of Single Mothers: Evidence from Canadian Provinces

Listed author(s):
  • Matt Brzozowski

This paper evaluates the impact of the 1995-1998 Ontario welfare reforms on the standard of living among single mothers. I look at how different measures of single mothers’ consumption vary in response to transfer income shocks. Because welfare is a provincial responsibility in Canada, this study is able to consider the effects of the welfare reforms in Ontario, in comparison with other Canadian jurisdictions at the same time. By utilizing a ‘difference in difference’ natural experiment design I compare the changes in the standard of living of Ontario single mothers to changes in the standards of living of three distinct control groups. The comparison with control groups under different provincial administrations and the implementation of propensity score matching estimates sets my approach apart from previous similar work. The results indicate an initial decrease in the relative standard of living of Ontario single mothers. The immediate policy impact has been largely reversed with the complete implementation of welfare reforms and the introduction of National Child Benefit program. I find that the traditional regression approach overestimates the immediate negative effects of policy changes and underestimates the subsequent recovery. I find that the results are sensitive to the choice of control group; the inclusion of geographically different control groups adds significant insight to the analysis.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by McMaster University in its series Department of Economics Working Papers with number 2004-15.

in new window

Length: 46 pages
Date of creation: 2004
Handle: RePEc:mcm:deptwp:2004-15
Contact details of provider: Postal:
1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4M4

Phone: (905) 525-9140 ext. 22765
Fax: (905) 521-8232
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. A. Smith, Jeffrey & E. Todd, Petra, 2005. "Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators?," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1-2), pages 305-353.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mcm:deptwp:2004-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.