IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kue/epaper/e-25-012.html

A Meta-Analysis of Perceived Overqualification: Resource-Based Mechanisms with Cultural Moderators

Author

Listed:
  • Peiyu Ge
  • Tomoki SEKIGUCHI

Abstract

Perceived overqualification (POQ), the belief that one’s qualifications exceed job requirements, is an increasingly prevalent phenomenon, yet empirical findings regarding its effects remain mixed. Based on Conservation of Resources theory, this meta-analysis of 233 studies (257 samples, N = 89,617) examines how POQ influences work behavior through two competing mechanisms: personal-resource sufficiency and workplace-resource depletion. Results indicate that POQ simultaneously builds personal resources and depletes workplace resources, generating opposing effects on behavior. Personal-resource sufficiency promotes proactive and prosocial behavior and reduces counterproductive work behavior, whereas workplace-resource depletion shows a reversed pattern. Overall, POQ exhibits a positive total effect on proactive and counterproductive work behavior, and a negative total effect on prosocial behavior. In terms of cultural moderation, the positive link between POQ and personal-resource sufficiency is weaker in high-power-distance and high-individualism contexts, whereas the depletion pathway remains invariant. These findings integrate the dual pathways of POQ and clarify the cultural boundary conditions of its effects. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Peiyu Ge & Tomoki SEKIGUCHI, 2026. "A Meta-Analysis of Perceived Overqualification: Resource-Based Mechanisms with Cultural Moderators," Discussion papers e-25-012, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
  • Handle: RePEc:kue:epaper:e-25-012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dp/papers/e-25-012.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kue:epaper:e-25-012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Graduate School of Economics Project Center (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fekyojp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.