IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i11p5796-d564187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Laparoscopy in Low-Income Countries: 10-Year Experience and Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Damiano Pizzol

    (Italian Agency for Development Cooperation, Khartoum 11111, Sudan)

  • Mike Trott

    (The Cambridge Centre for Sport & Exercise Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK
    Vision and Eye Research Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK)

  • Igor Grabovac

    (Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1010, Austria)

  • Mario Antunes

    (Department of Surgery, Central Hospital of Beira, Beira 13016, Mozambique
    Department of Surgery, Catholic University of Mozambique, Beira 13016, Mozambique)

  • Anna Claudia Colangelo

    (Department of Surgery and Organ Transplantation, University of Padua, 35125 Padua, Italy)

  • Simona Ippoliti

    (Department of Urology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn PE30 4ET, UK)

  • Cristian Petre Ilie

    (Department of Urology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn PE30 4ET, UK)

  • Anne Carrie

    (Department of Urology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn PE30 4ET, UK)

  • Nicola Veronese

    (Geriatric Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Palermo, 90121 Palermo, Italy)

  • Lee Smith

    (The Cambridge Centre for Sport & Exercise Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK)

Abstract

Laparoscopy is a procedure that ultimately reduces hospital stay time and speeds up post-operative recovery. It is mainly performed in high-income countries but its implementation in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is increasing. However, no aggregate data exist regarding the outcomes of this procedure in resource-limited settings. We retrospectively reviewed all cases of laparoscopy recorded from January 2007 to March 2017 at the Department of Surgery of Beira to assess the related outcomes. Moreover, we performed a systematic review of the laparoscopic practices and outcomes in low-income countries. Data from the Department of Surgery of Beira identified 363 laparoscopic procedures, mainly relating to gynecological diseases, cholelithiasis, and appendicectomy with only a 1.6% complication rate (6 cases) and a 1.9% conversion rate (7 cases) to open surgery. The systematic review showed a pooled risk of overall complications significantly lower in laparoscopic vs. open appendicectomy (OR = 0.43; 95% CI 0.19–0.97; I 2 = 85.7%) and a significantly lower risk of infection (OR = 0.53; 95% CI 0.43–0.65; I 2 = 0.00%). The pooled SMD in operation duration in laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy was 0.58 (95% CI −0.00; 1.15; I 2 = 96.52), while the pooled SMD in hospitalization days was −1.35 (95% CI −1.87; −0.82; I 2 = 96.41). Laparoscopy is an expensive procedure to adopt as it requires new equipment and specialized trained health workers. However, it could reduce post-operative costs and complications, especially in terms of infections. It is crucial to increase its accessibility, acceptability, and quality particularly in LMICs, especially during this COVID-19 era when the reduction of patient hospitalization is essential.

Suggested Citation

  • Damiano Pizzol & Mike Trott & Igor Grabovac & Mario Antunes & Anna Claudia Colangelo & Simona Ippoliti & Cristian Petre Ilie & Anne Carrie & Nicola Veronese & Lee Smith, 2021. "Laparoscopy in Low-Income Countries: 10-Year Experience and Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-11, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5796-:d:564187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5796/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5796/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesco Di Gennaro & Claudia Marotta & Damiano Pizzol & Kajal Chhaganlal & Laura Monno & Giovanni Putoto & Annalisa Saracino & Alessandra Casuccio & Walter Mazzucco, 2018. "Prevalence and Predictors of Malaria in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infected Patients in Beira, Mozambique," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-8, September.
    2. Sue Duval & Richard Tweedie, 2000. "Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel-Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 455-463, June.
    3. Alessandro Liberati & Douglas G Altman & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Cynthia Mulrow & Peter C Gøtzsche & John P A Ioannidis & Mike Clarke & P J Devereaux & Jos Kleijnen & David Moher, 2009. "The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-28, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meng Cao & Minghui Quan & Jie Zhuang, 2019. "Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Tang, Xinfeng & Tang, Suqin & Ren, Zhihong & Wong, Daniel Fu Keung, 2020. "Psychological risk and protective factors associated with depressive symptoms among adolescents in secondary schools in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Ricardo M. Hodann-Caudevilla & Cintia Díaz-Silveira & Francisco A. Burgos-Julián & Miguel A. Santed, 2020. "Mindfulness-Based Interventions for People with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Daniele Nucci & Cristina Fatigoni & Andrea Amerio & Anna Odone & Vincenza Gianfredi, 2020. "Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Tomohide Yamada & Kazuo Hara & Hitomi Umematsu & Ryo Suzuki & Takashi Kadowaki, 2012. "Erectile Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Events in Diabetic Men: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-7, September.
    6. Rafael del-Pino-Casado & Marta Rodríguez Cardosa & Catalina López-Martínez & Vasiliki Orgeta, 2019. "The association between subjective caregiver burden and depressive symptoms in carers of older relatives: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Ramya Ramamoorthi & Daniel Gahreman & Timothy Skinner & Simon Moss, 2019. "The effect of yoga practice on glycemic control and other health parameters in the prediabetic state: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Carmela A White & Bob Uttl & Mark D Holder, 2019. "Meta-analyses of positive psychology interventions: The effects are much smaller than previously reported," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-48, May.
    9. Amy J Morgan & Anna Ross & Nicola J Reavley, 2018. "Systematic review and meta-analysis of Mental Health First Aid training: Effects on knowledge, stigma, and helping behaviour," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Jong Seung Kim & Sam Hyun Kwon, 2016. "Mupirocin in the Treatment of Staphylococcal Infections in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Meng-Ni Wu & Ping-Tao Tseng & Tien-Yu Chen & Yen-Wen Chen & Li-Min Liou & Pao-Yen Lin & Chung-Yao Hsu, 2018. "The efficacy and tolerability of rotigotine on patients with periodic limb movement in sleep: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, April.
    12. William Kofi Bosu & Siobhan Theresa Reilly & Justice Moses Kwaku Aheto & Eugenio Zucchelli, 2019. "Hypertension in older adults in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, April.
    13. Agustín Manresa-Rocamora & José Manuel Sarabia & Alejandro Javaloyes & Andrew A. Flatt & Manuel Moya-Ramón, 2021. "Heart Rate Variability-Guided Training for Enhancing Cardiac-Vagal Modulation, Aerobic Fitness, and Endurance Performance: A Methodological Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Meng Cao & Yucheng Tang & Shu Li & Yu Zou, 2021. "Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Overweight and Obesity Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Rafael del-Pino-Casado & Antonio Frías-Osuna & Pedro A Palomino-Moral & María Ruzafa-Martínez & Antonio J Ramos-Morcillo, 2018. "Social support and subjective burden in caregivers of adults and older adults: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Moses N. Ikiugu & Whitney Lucas-Molitor & Diana Feldhacker & Cassidy Gebhart & Mallory Spier & Lauren Kapels & Riley Arnold & Rebecca Gaikowski, 2019. "Guidelines for Occupational Therapy Interventions Based on Meaningful and Psychologically Rewarding Occupations," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(7), pages 2027-2053, October.
    17. Xiaoli Liu & Guichuan Huang & Jing Zhang & Longju Zhang & Zongan Liang, 2020. "Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of long noncoding RNA MALAT-1 expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Xiaowen Li & Xing Rong & Zhi Wang & Aihua Lin, 2020. "Association between Smoking and Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    19. Joan Puig-Barberà & Sonia Tamames-Gómez & Pedro Plans-Rubio & José María Eiros-Bouza, 2022. "Relative Effectiveness of Cell-Cultured versus Egg-Based Seasonal Influenza Vaccines in Preventing Influenza-Related Outcomes in Subjects 18 Years Old or Older: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-20, January.
    20. Xiaofeng Zhou & Guan Zhang & Ye Tian, 2015. "p53 Status Correlates with the Risk of Recurrence in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancers Treated with Bacillus Calmette–Guérin: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5796-:d:564187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.