IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kue/epaper/e-24-008.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The influence of the Viveza in the Latin American Business Environment:Exploring and mapping a regional psychological construct

Author

Listed:
  • Alexis SANDES
  • Tomoki SEKIGUCHI

Abstract

Reported news on high-profile business-people engaging in unethical acts frequently headlines Latin American media. Local individuals agree that the Viveza, a Latin American indigenous phenomenon based on prioritizing individual benefits over the ethicality of the acts, promotes dishonest behaviors in the Latin American business environment. Despite its importance for Latin American Societies Despite its importance for individuals who want to conduct business in Latin America, there is a lack of empirical research about the Viveza phenomenon. Through 45 semi-structured interviews with native individuals from 20 Latin American countries who have lived in Japan in the past two years, this study aims to explore and map the Viveza construct and its consequences for Latin American individuals. This research reveals that the Viveza is an institutionalized behavioral pattern in Latin American societies that shapes local social norms, allowing individuals to justify unethical behaviors easily. Moreover, this research also reveals that Viveza significantly influences the daily social interactions between Latin American individuals and the Latin American business environment. This study contributes to the literature by establishing a common ground for a relevant factor in the studies of Latin American societies. In addition, this study provides useful insights for non-Latin American practitioners who engage in business in the Latin American region.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexis SANDES & Tomoki SEKIGUCHI, 2025. "The influence of the Viveza in the Latin American Business Environment:Exploring and mapping a regional psychological construct," Discussion papers e-24-008, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    • Handle: RePEc:kue:epaper:e-24-008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dp/papers/e-24-008.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoffrey Jones & Rachael Comunale, 2018. "Business, Governments and Political Risk in South Asia and Latin America since 1970," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(3), pages 233-264, November.
    2. Hofstede, Geert, 1994. "The business of international business is culture," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Omar Azfar & Young Lee & Anand Swamy, 2001. "The Causes and Consequences of Corruption," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 573(1), pages 42-56, January.
    4. Uri Gneezy, 2005. "Deception: The Role of Consequences," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(1), pages 384-394, March.
    5. T Lenartowicz & J P Johnson, 2003. "A cross-national assessment of the values of Latin America managers: contrasting hues or shades of gray?," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 34(3), pages 266-281, May.
    6. Oded Shenkar & Stephen B Tallman & Hao Wang & Jie Wu, 2022. "National culture and international business: A path forward," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(3), pages 516-533, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rohit Subhash Prabhudesai & Ch V V S N V Prasad & Boon Chuan Ang, 2017. "Exploring Emerging Latin America: Implications for German Companies Using Spain as a Springboard Country," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(4), pages 993-1009, August.
    2. Johannes Abeler & Armin Falk & Fabian Kosse, 2025. "Malleability of Preferences for Honesty," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 135(667), pages 982-998.
    3. Thomas de Haan & Theo Offerman & Randolph Sloof, 2015. "Money Talks? An Experimental Investigation Of Cheap Talk And Burned Money," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56(4), pages 1385-1426, November.
    4. Minguzzi, Antonio & Passaro, Renato, 2001. "The network of relationships between the economic environment and the entrepreneurial culture in small firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 181-207, March.
    5. Gill, David & Prowse, Victoria & Vlassopoulos, Michael, 2013. "Cheating in the workplace: An experimental study of the impact of bonuses and productivity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 120-134.
    6. Hitoshi Matsushima & Shunya Noda, 2020. "Mechanism Design with Blockchain Enforcement," DSSR Discussion Papers 111, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
    7. Newburry, William & Gardberg, Naomi A. & Sanchez, Juan I., 2014. "Employer Attractiveness in Latin America: The Association Among Foreignness, Internationalization and Talent Recruitment," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 327-344.
    8. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2016-029 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Andreoni, James & Serra-Garcia, Marta, 2021. "Time inconsistent charitable giving," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    10. Petra Nieken & Sven Walther, 2024. "Honesty in Virtual Communication," CESifo Working Paper Series 11094, CESifo.
    11. Alexander Sebald & Markus Walzl, 2014. "Subjective Performance Evaluations and Reciprocity in Principal–Agent Relations," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 116(2), pages 570-590, April.
    12. Topi Miettinen & Sigrid Suetens, 2008. "Communication and Guilt in a Prisoner's Dilemma," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 52(6), pages 945-960, December.
    13. Luis Alfonso Dau & Aya S. Chacar & Marjorie A. Lyles & Jiatao Li, 2022. "Informal institutions and international business: Toward an integrative research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 985-1010, August.
    14. Buser, Thomas & Sangi, Sahar, 2025. "Willingness to Compete in Dirty Competitions," IZA Discussion Papers 17676, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. repec:cgr:cgsser:03-13 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Jacquemet, N. & Luchini, S. & Malézieux, A. & Shogren, J.F., 2020. "Who’ll stop lying under oath? Empirical evidence from tax evasion games," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    17. Jiabin Wu, 2018. "Indirect higher order beliefs and cooperation," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 21(4), pages 858-876, December.
    18. Christine Exley, 2013. "Incentives for Prosocial Behavior: The Role of Reputations," Discussion Papers 12-022, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
    19. Giuseppe Attanasi & Pierpaolo Battigalli & Elena Manzoni, 2016. "Incomplete-Information Models of Guilt Aversion in the Trust Game," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 648-667, March.
    20. Johannesson Magnus & Östling Robert & Ranehill Eva, 2010. "The Effect of Competition on Physical Activity: A Randomized Trial," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-31, September.
    21. Marie Claire Villeval, 2019. "Comportements (non) éthiques et stratégies morales," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 70(6), pages 1021-1046.
    22. Ernesto Dal Bó & Marko Terviö, 2013. "Self-Esteem, Moral Capital, And Wrongdoing," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 599-663, June.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kue:epaper:e-24-008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Graduate School of Economics Project Center (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fekyojp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.