IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/jau/wpaper/2026-09.html

Identifying left-behind places: A multidimensional typology at the municipal level

Author

Listed:
  • Luisa Alamá-Sabater

    (Department of Economics and IIDL, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain)

  • Miguel Ángel Márquez

    (Department of Economics, Universidad de Extremadura, Spain)

  • Guillem Rodilla

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain)

  • Emili Tortosa-Ausina

    (IVIE, Valencia and IIDL and Department of Economics, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain)

Abstract

This paper investigates how demographic, socioeconomic, and second-nature geographic factors jointly shape the emergence, spatial distribution, and heterogeneity of left-behind places (LBPs) in Spain. Using municipal-level data, it develops an empirical strategy combining cluster analysis, frontier analysis, and a multinomial logit model to identify distinct types of territorial vulnerability, to measure how close municipalities are to transitioning into more disadvantaged states, and to estimate the probability of belonging to specific LBP categories. The results reveal substantial heterogeneity across left-behind places, uncovering multiple forms of municipal vulnerability. A central contribution is the explicit incorporation of second-nature geography into the clustering procedure itself rather than treating geography as a merely contextual or ex post factor. These variables emerge as critical drivers of territorial disadvantage, and their inclusion leads to the reclassification of nearly 20% of Spanish municipalities, uncovering forms of hidden marginality that would remain invisible in analyses based solely on demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. From a policy perspective, the findings support a shift toward what the authors term systemic place-based policies; forward-looking strategies that seek to reshape the spatial preconditions for economic activity rather than simply adapting to existing territorial structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Luisa Alamá-Sabater & Miguel Ángel Márquez & Guillem Rodilla & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2026. "Identifying left-behind places: A multidimensional typology at the municipal level," Working Papers 2026/09, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
  • Handle: RePEc:jau:wpaper:2026/09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.doctreballeco.uji.es/wpficheros/Alama_et_al_09_2026.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jorge De la Roca Sol & James Faulconbridge & Stephen Gibbons & Simona Iammarino & Amanda Ross, 2024. "The Journal of Economic Geography in 2024 and beyond," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 191-192.
    2. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Lewis Dijkstra & Hugo Poelman, 2024. "The Geography of EU Discontent and the Regional Development Trap," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 100(3), pages 213-245, May.
    3. Harald Bathelt & Maximilian Buchholz & Michael Storper, 2024. "The nature, causes, and consequences of inter-regional inequality," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(3), pages 353-374.
    4. Masahisa Fujita & Paul Krugman, 2004. "The new economic geography: Past, present and the future," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 4, pages 177-206.
    5. Stefania Fiorentino & Amy K Glasmeier & Linda Lobao & Ron Martin & Peter Tyler, 2024. "‘Left behind places’: what are they and why do they matter?," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16.
    6. Andy Pike & Vincent Béal & Nicolas Cauchi-Duval & Rachel Franklin & Nadir Kinossian & Thilo Lang & Tim Leibert & Danny MacKinnon & Max Rousseau & Jeroen Royer & Loris Servillo & John Tomaney & Sanne V, 2024. "‘Left behind places’: a geographical etymology," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(6), pages 1167-1179, June.
    7. Bathelt, Harald & Buchholz, Maximilian & Storper, Michael, 2024. "The nature, causes, and consequences of inter-regional inequality," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123014, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Franz Kronthaler, 2005. "Economic capability of East German regions: Results of a cluster analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(6), pages 739-750.
    9. Dylan S Connor & Aleksander K BergArizona & Tom Kemeny & Peter J Kedron, 2024. "Who gets left behind by left behind places?," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 17(1), pages 37-58.
    10. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Lewis Dijkstra, 2021. "Does Cohesion Policy reduce EU discontent and Euroscepticism?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 354-369, February.
    11. Alessandra Faggian & Alessandra Michelangeli & Kateryna Tkach, 2024. "Three types of income inequality: a comparison of left behind places and more developed regions in the EU," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 17(1), pages 87-102.
    12. Masahisa Fujita & Paul Krugman, 2004. "The new economic geography: Past, present and the future," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Raymond J. G. M. Florax & David A. Plane (ed.), Fifty Years of Regional Science, pages 139-164, Springer.
    13. Lewis Dijkstra & Hugo Poelman & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2020. "The geography of EU discontent," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(6), pages 737-753, June.
    14. Luisa Alamá-Sabater & Miguel Á Márquez & Emili Tortosa-Ausina & Júlia Cravo, 2025. "Urban–rural links in relaunching left-behind places: the case of Portuguese municipalities," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 371-405.
    15. Steven Brakman & Charles van Marrewijk, 2013. "Reflections on cluster policies," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 6(2), pages 217-231.
    16. André Torre & Frédéric Wallet (ed.), 2014. "Regional Development and Proximity Relations," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14813.
    17. Sebastien Bourdin & Sergio Destefanis & Gianluigi Coppola & Maria Kubara, 2025. "What are the impacts of Cohesion Policy on the trade-off between employment and productivity?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 2379444-237, December.
    18. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    19. Abedifar, Pejman & Kashizadeh, Seyed Javad & Ongena, Steven, 2024. "Flood, farms and credit: The role of branch banking in the era of climate change," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    20. Simona Iammarino & Andrés Rodriguez-Pose & Michael Storper, 2019. "Regional inequality in Europe: evidence, theory and policy implications," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 273-298.
    21. Martin Hedlund, 2016. "Mapping the Socioeconomic Landscape of Rural Sweden: Towards a Typology of Rural Areas," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 460-474, March.
    22. Philip McCann & Attila Varga, 2015. "The Reforms to the Regional and Urban Policy of the European Union: EU Cohesion Policy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(8), pages 1255-1257, August.
    23. Paolo Di Caro & Ugo Fratesi, 2022. "One policy, different effects: Estimating the region‐specific impacts of EU cohesion policy," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 307-330, January.
    24. Philip McCann, 2015. "The Regional and Urban Policy of the European Union," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 16000.
    25. Marc Cowling & Ross Brown & Weixi Liu & Augusto Rocha, 2024. "Getting left behind? The localised consequences of exclusion from the credit market for UK SMEs," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 17(1), pages 181-200.
    26. Páez, Antonio & Scott, Darren M. & Morency, Catherine, 2012. "Measuring accessibility: positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 141-153.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2026. "Why size really doesn’t matter: from megacity myths to place-sensitive prosperity," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 11-26, January.
    2. Le Petit-Guerin Mehdi & Velthuis Sanne & Royer Jeroen & Cauchi-Duval Nicolas & Franklin Rachel & Leibert Tim & MacKinnon Danny & Pike Andy, 2025. "Identifying trajectories of regional ‘left-behindness’ in the EU15 from 1982 to 2017," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 69(4), pages 177-190.
    3. Cassandra C. Wang & Huiwen Gong & Jiayuan Mao, 2026. "Addressing interregional inequality with Chinese characteristics? The Mountain–Sea Collaboration model in Zhejiang," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 58(3), pages 370-390, May.
    4. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Bartalucci, Federico, 2026. "A Union under siege, or a Union besieging itself? The EU's new budget and the future of European integration," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 139012, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Luisa Alamá-Sabater & Joan Crespo & Miguel Ángel Márquez & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2026. "Population–employment dynamics in the European Union: Does innovation lead or follow?," Working Papers 2026/08, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    6. Casas, Pablo & Christou, Tryfonas & García Rodríguez, Abián & Heidelk, Tillmann & Lazarou, Nicholas Joseph & Monfort, Philippe & Salotti, Simone, 2024. "The updated RHOMOLO impact assessment of the 2014-2020 European cohesion policy (including REACT-EU)," MPRA Paper 122873, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Yannis PSYCHARIS, 2025. "Euroscepticism and inequality in the European Union: the two sides of the same coin," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 62, pages 205-212.
    8. Seyed Peyman Asadi & Ahmad Jafari Samimi, 2019. "Lagging-behind Areas as a Challenge to the Regional Development Strategy: What Insights can New and Evolutionary Economic Geography Offer?," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1923, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2019.
    9. Luisa Alamá-Sabater & Joan Crespo & Miguel A. Márquez & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2026. "Population–employment dynamics in the European Union: Does innovation lead or follow?," Working Papers 2605, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.
    10. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2025. "Forging a sustainable future together: Cohesion Policy at its defining moment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 2552869-255, December.
    11. Rodrigo Cuenca De Armas & Maria Teresa Balaguer-Coll & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2026. "Financial development traps in European regions: Theory and evidence," Working Papers 2026/06, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    12. Luigi Capoani, 2023. "Review of the gravity model: origins and critical analysis of its theoretical development," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(5), pages 1-43, May.
    13. Niembro, Andrés & Calá, Carla Daniela, 2024. "Regional structural change in Argentina (1996-2019): Concepts, measurements and unequal trajectories over the business cycle," Nülan. Deposited Documents 4106, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales.
    14. Ferdi Kesikoğlu & Ali İhsan Balcı & Ersin Eraslan, 2025. "Determination of the Convergence of Turkey and European Union Countries in Terms of Youth Labor Indicators by Cluster Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-25, August.
    15. Emanuel Shachmurove & Yochanan Shachmurove, 2010. "Location, Location, Location: Entrepreneurial Finance Meets Economic Geography," PIER Working Paper Archive 10-030, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    16. Panagiotis Artelaris, 2021. "Regional economic growth and inequality in Greece," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 141-158, February.
    17. Katrin Rickmeier, 2025. "Mobility after job loss in Germany: the effects of regional economic opportunities and economic worries on mobility intentions and behaviour," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 45(2), pages 271-297, June.
    18. Mokhele Masilonyane & Geyer Hermanus S., 2021. "A theoretical foundation for investigating the spatial economic attributes of airport-centric developments," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Paradigm, vol. 54(54), pages 21-31, December.
    19. Kim, Ho Yeon, 2012. "Shrinking population and the urban hierarchy," IDE Discussion Papers 360, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    20. KEOGAN, Lucia & CALA, Carla Daniela & BELMARTINO, Andrea, 2020. "Perfiles Sectoriales De Especialización Productiva En Las Provincias Argentinas: Distribución Intersectorial Del Empleo Entre 1996 Y 2014," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 20(1), pages 59-76.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C3 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • O21 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Planning Models; Planning Policy
    • R1 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics
    • R23 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population
    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jau:wpaper:2026/09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: María Aurora Garcia Gallego (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ueujies.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.