IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp18804.html

Human Enhancement Technologies: A Survey Experiment on Private Demand and Governance Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Immordino, Giovanni

    (University of Naples Federico II)

  • Macis, Mario

    (The Johns Hopkins Carey Business School)

  • Marino, Immacolata

    (University of Naples Federico II)

  • Panebianco, Fabrizio

    (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano)

Abstract

When a new technology promises large private benefits but may impose social costs that markets do not price, demand need not reveal how citizens want it governed. We examine this in a nationally representative U.S. survey experiment (N=5,556) on human enhancement technologies (HET). Vignettes randomize benefit domain, mechanism, heritability, purpose, and risk; we elicit stated adoption, preferred regulation, and ethical and societal concerns. About 53% would adopt. An enhancing rather than restorative framing lowers adoption by about five percentage points, as much as a severe side-effect profile. About 28% would not adopt at any benefit, a refusal driven overwhelmingly by the enhancing framing, not risk, consistent with a non-compensatory constraint. Most who would adopt still favor strict regulation, and most who would never adopt do not wish to forbid others. Productivity enhancement generates the most ethical concern but attracts the least regulation, and respondents favor subsidizing rather than taxing its adoption, consistent with a concern about access rather than safety. Private demand is an unreliable guide to the governance citizens want, informing regulators seeking to align technical change with societal values.

Suggested Citation

  • Immordino, Giovanni & Macis, Mario & Marino, Immacolata & Panebianco, Fabrizio, 2026. "Human Enhancement Technologies: A Survey Experiment on Private Demand and Governance Preferences," IZA Discussion Papers 18804, IZA Network @ LISER.
    • Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp18804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://docs.iza.org/dp18804.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu, 2025. "The simple macroeconomics of AI," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 40(121), pages 13-58.
    2. Alberto Alesina & Armando Miano & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2023. "Immigration and Redistribution," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(1), pages 1-39.
    3. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2020. "The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(1), pages 25-35.
    4. Stefanie Stantcheva, 2023. "How to Run Surveys: A Guide to Creating Your Own Identifying Variation and Revealing the Invisible," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 15(1), pages 205-234, September.
    5. Leigh R. Hochberg & Mijail D. Serruya & Gerhard M. Friehs & Jon A. Mukand & Maryam Saleh & Abraham H. Caplan & Almut Branner & David Chen & Richard D. Penn & John P. Donoghue, 2006. "Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia," Nature, Nature, vol. 442(7099), pages 164-171, July.
    6. Julio J. Elías & Nicola Lacetera & Mario Macis, 2019. "Paying for Kidneys? A Randomized Survey and Choice Experiment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(8), pages 2855-2888, August.
    7. Olivier Coibion & Yuriy Gorodnichenko & Michael Weber, 2022. "Monetary Policy Communications and Their Effects on Household Inflation Expectations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 130(6), pages 1537-1584.
    8. Ilyana Kuziemko & Michael I. Norton & Emmanuel Saez & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2015. "How Elastic Are Preferences for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(4), pages 1478-1508, April.
    9. Alvin E. Roth, 2007. "Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(3), pages 37-58, Summer.
    10. Hainmueller, Jens & Hopkins, Daniel J. & Yamamoto, Teppei, 2014. "Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 1-30, January.
    11. Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth & Johannes Wohlfart, 2023. "Designing Information Provision Experiments," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 61(1), pages 3-40, March.
    12. Michael Siegrist, 2000. "The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jessen, Lasse J. & Koehne, Sebastian & Nüß, Patrick & Ruhose, Jens, 2024. "Socioeconomic Inequality in Life Expectancy: Perception and Policy Demand," IZA Discussion Papers 16780, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Stumpf, Elisa & Uebelmesser, Silke, 2025. "Preferences for wealth redistribution: The role of social background and merit," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 90(PB).
    3. Botelho Azevedo, Alda & Gonçalves, Inês & Pereira dos Santos, João, 2025. "Can’t Buy Me Home: Beliefs, Facts, and Policy in the Housing Affordability Crisis," IZA Discussion Papers 18073, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. Julio Elías & Nicola Lacetera & Mario Macis, 2026. "Is the Price Right? The Role of Economic Trade-Offs in Explaining Reactions to Price Surges," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 1814-1834, March.
    5. Elisa Stumpf & Silke Uebelmesser, 2025. "Preferences for Wealth Redistribution: The Role of Social Background and Merit," Jena Economics Research Papers 2025-008, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    6. Leng, Alyssa Amanda & Edwards, Ryan Barclay & Wood, Terence, 2025. "Narratives, immigration and immigration policy preferences," SocArXiv c63uq_v1, Center for Open Science.
    7. Jessen, Lasse J. & Köhne, Sebastian & Nüß, Patrick & Ruhose, Jens, 2026. "Socioeconomic inequality in life expectancy: Perception and policy demand in the United States and Germany," IWH Discussion Papers 12/2026, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    8. Blesse, Sebastian & Lergetporer, Philipp & Pache, Clara-Marie & Zeidler, Helen, 2026. "Do People Support Information Campaigns about Inequality?," IZA Discussion Papers 18694, IZA Network @ LISER.
    9. Cattaneo, Cristina & Grieco, Daniela, 2021. "Turning opposition into support to immigration: The role of narratives," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 785-801.
    10. Fuster, Andreas & Gianinazzi, Virginia & Hackethal, Andreas & Schnorpfeil, Philip & Weber, Michael, 2026. "The response of debtors to rate changes," CFS Working Paper Series 739, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    11. Aksoy, Cevat Giray & Cabrales, Antonio & Dolls, Mathias & Durante, Ruben & Windsteiger, Lisa, 2025. "Calamities, common interests, shared identity: What shapes social cohesion in Europe?," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1049-1068.
    12. Francesco D'Acunto & Janet Gao & Lu Liu & Kai Lu & Zhengwei Wang & Jun Yang, 2025. "Subjective Expectations and Financial Intermediation," CESifo Working Paper Series 11780, CESifo.
    13. Marino, Maria & Iacono, Roberto & Mollerstrom, Johanna, 2024. "(Mis-)Perceptions, information, and political polarization: A survey and a systematic literature review," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    14. Riccardo Bruni & Alessandro Gioffré & Maria Marino, 2025. "In‐group bias in preferences for redistribution: a survey experiment in Italy," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 92(367), pages 1009-1080, July.
    15. Stumpf, Elisa & Schuetz, Jana & Uebelmesser, Silke & Baginski, Ronja & Aprea, Carmela, 2026. "Beliefs about demographic change: how well are individuals informed?," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 43-71, January.
    16. Lergetporer, Philipp & Woessmann, Ludger, 2023. "Earnings information and public preferences for university tuition: Evidence from representative experiments," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    17. Sebastian Blesse & Philipp Lergetporer & Clara-Marie Pache & Helen Zeidler, 2026. "Do People Support Information Campaigns About Inequality?," CESifo Working Paper Series 12708, CESifo.
    18. Giorgia Barboni & Nicol√°s de Roux & Santiago Perez-Cardona, 2024. "Perceived Social Acceptance and Migrants' Financial Inclusion," Documentos CEDE 21278, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    19. Cars Hommes & Isabelle Salle & Julien Pinter, 2026. "Fiscal Beliefs & Narratives," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 26-031/VI, Tinbergen Institute.
    20. Alda Botelho Azevedo & Inês Gonçalves & João Pereira dos Santos, 2025. "Can’t Buy Me Home – Beliefs, Facts, and Policy in the Housing Affordability Crisis," GEE Papers 191, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised Jun 2025.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp18804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Fallak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/izaaalu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.