IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/imk/report/194-2025.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modell Deutschland neu justieren – Nachfrage und Innovationen staerken

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Dullien

    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK))

  • Tom Bauermann

    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK))

  • Alexander Herzog-Stein

    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK))

  • Christoph Paetz

    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK))

  • Katja Rietzler

    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK))

  • Ulrike Stein

    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK))

  • Sabine Stephan

    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK))

  • Silke Tober

    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK))

  • Sebastian Watzka

    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK))

Abstract

Deutschlands Wirtschaft stagniert seit zwei Jahren und das Bruttoinlandsprodukt ist kaum höher als vor fünf Jahren. Die Rahmenbedingungen für Deutschlands exportorientiertes Wirtschaftsmodell haben sich drastisch geändert. Ohne zügige wirtschaftspolitische Maßnahmen droht der industrielle Kern der deutschen Wirtschaft wegzubrechen. Die aktuelle Diskussion erinnert an die Reformdebatte der frühen 2000er Jahre. Damals wie heute waren die Unternehmen deutlich besser aufgestellt als vielfach wahrgenommen. Allerdings muss das Modell Deutschland an die neuen Gegebenheiten, insbesondere infolge der geostrategischen Ausrichtung von China und den USA, angepasst werden. Dabei ist eine hinreichende Binnennachfrage erforderlich, damit Exportorientiertheit mit steigenden Einkommen und einer tendenziell ausgeglichenen Leistungsbilanz vereinbar ist. Am dringlichsten ist die Überwindung der aktuellen Nachfrageschwäche durch eine Fiskalpolitik, die notwendige Infrastrukturinvestitionen auf den Weg bringt und ein günstiges Umfeld für private Investitionen und Innovationen schafft, sowie eine Beendigung der geldpolitischen Restriktion. Eine gezielte und auf EU-Ebene abgestimmte Industriepolitik sowie Maßnahmen zur Verringerung des Strompreises sind ebenso erforderlich wie eine neue Balance zwischen Regulierung und Innovationsfähigkeit.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Dullien & Tom Bauermann & Alexander Herzog-Stein & Christoph Paetz & Katja Rietzler & Ulrike Stein & Sabine Stephan & Silke Tober & Sebastian Watzka, 2025. "Modell Deutschland neu justieren – Nachfrage und Innovationen staerken," IMK Report 194-2025, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:imk:report:194-2025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_imk_report_194_2025.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2019. "Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(2), pages 3-30, Spring.
    2. Hubertus Bardt & Christoph M. Schmidt & Peter Bofinger & Heike Belitz & Martin Gornig & Karl Aiginger, 2019. "Industriepolitik — ineffizienter staatlicher Eingriff oder zukunftsweisende Option? [Industrial Policy — Inefficient State Intervention or Forward-looking Option?]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 99(2), pages 87-105, February.
    3. Aghion, Philippe & Antonin, Céline & Bunel, Simon & Jaravel, Xavier, 2022. "The Effects of Automation on Labor Demand: A Survey of the Recent Literature," CEPR Discussion Papers 16868, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Silke Tober, 2025. "IMK Inflationsmonitor - Inflation mit 2,2 % im Jahr 2024 sehr nah am Inflationsziel, Dynamik noch von Folgen der Preisschocks geprägt," IMK Policy Brief 184-2025, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    2. Ulrike Stein, 2025. "Stärkung der gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung und Stabilisierung des Rentenniveaus - Schriftliche Stellungnahme zur Anhörung des Finanzausschusses des Schleswig-Holsteinischen Landtags zum Alternativan," IMK Policy Brief 189-2025, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    3. Fabian Lindner & Anita Tiefensee, 2025. "Nachhaltigkeit der Wirtschaftspolitik - Stagnation statt Transformation - Lehren aus dem Neuen Magischen Viereck," IMK Studies 99-2025, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tao Chen & Shuwen Pi & Qing Sophie Wang, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence and Corporate Investment Efficiency: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Working Papers in Economics 25/05, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    2. Genz, Sabrina & Schnabel, Claus, 2023. "Digitalization is not gender-neutral," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    3. Gao, Jie & Li, Zhizhuo & Nguyen, Thithuha & Zhang, Wentao, 2025. "Digital transformation and enterprise employment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Barth, Erling & Davis, James C. & Freeman, Richard B. & McElheran, Kristina, 2023. "Twisting the demand curve: Digitalization and the older workforce," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 443-467.
    5. Kudoh, Noritaka & Miyamoto, Hiroaki, 2025. "Robots, AI, and unemployment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Fernández, Gastón P. & Rammer, Christian, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 188-205.
    7. Daniel Jacobi & Elizabeth M. King & Claudio Montenegro & Peter F. Orazem, 2025. "Governance, Risks, and Returns to Human Capital," Working Papers wp564, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    8. Rudnik, Alesia, 2024. "Machinery of dissent: Exploring the techno-social practices of modern protests," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 13(4), pages 1-30.
    9. Bárány, Zsófia L. & Siegel, Christian, 2020. "Biased technological change and employment reallocation," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    10. Caselli, Mauro & Fracasso, Andrea & Scicchitano, Sergio & Traverso, Silvio & Tundis, Enrico, 2025. "What workers and robots do: An activity-based analysis of the impact of robotization on changes in local employment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    11. Cao, Sean & Jiang, Wei & Wang, Junbo & Yang, Baozhong, 2024. "From Man vs. Machine to Man + Machine: The art and AI of stock analyses," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    12. Sindhwani, Rahul & Pereira, Vijay & Sampat, Brinda & Shankar, Amit & Nigam, Achint & Salwan, Prashant, 2025. "Exploring barriers to social robot adoption: A mixed-method study in the Indian retail sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    13. David Kunst, 2019. "Deskilling among Manufacturing Production Workers," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 19-050/VI, Tinbergen Institute, revised 30 Dec 2020.
    14. Dilip Mookherjee & Debraj Ray, 2022. "Growth, Automation and the Long-Run Share of Labor," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 46, pages 1-26, October.
    15. Montobbio, Fabio & Staccioli, Jacopo & Virgillito, Maria Enrica & Vivarelli, Marco, 2022. "Robots and the origin of their labour-saving impact," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    16. Fedorets Alexandra & Kirchner Stefan & Adriaans Jule & Giering Oliver, 2022. "Data on Digital Transformation in the German Socio-Economic Panel," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 242(5-6), pages 691-705, December.
    17. Milan Miric & Nan Jia & Kenneth G. Huang, 2023. "Using supervised machine learning for large‐scale classification in management research: The case for identifying artificial intelligence patents," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 491-519, February.
    18. Li, Daiyue & Jin, Yanhong & Cheng, Mingwang, 2024. "Unleashing the power of industrial robotics on firm productivity: Evidence from China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 500-520.
    19. Zhou, Yuwen & Shi, Xin, 2025. "How does digital technology adoption affect corporate employment? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    20. Gries, Thomas & Naudé, Wim, 2022. "Modelling artificial intelligence in economics," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 56, pages 1-12.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:imk:report:194-2025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sabine Nemitz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imkhbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.