IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/wp01772.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reconcilation of the Dichotomies in Marketing Theory and Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Koshy, Abraham
  • Dang Jha Priya

Abstract

Although marketing researchers have aimed to discover theories in marketing, the level of theory development within the discipline is low. The paper reviews the knowledge development practices in marketing to identify a set of dichotomies that constrain theory development in the field. These dichotomies include (i) Dichotomy between positivist and relativist research paradigm, (ii) Dischotomy between theory testing and creation and (iii) Dichotomy between academics and practice. The paper then proposes means of reconciling these dichotomies so as to accelerate the level of theory development within the discipline.

Suggested Citation

  • Koshy, Abraham & Dang Jha Priya, 2003. "Reconcilation of the Dichotomies in Marketing Theory and Practice," IIMA Working Papers WP2003-09-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp01772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iima.ac.in/sites/default/files/rnpfiles/2003-09-01abrahamkoshy.pdf
    File Function: English Version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hudson, Laurel Anderson & Ozanne, Julie L, 1988. "Alternative Ways of Seeking Knowledge in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(4), pages 508-521, March.
    2. Anderson, Paul F, 1986. "On Method in Consumer Research: A Critical Relativist Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(2), pages 155-173, September.
    3. Frank M. Bass & Jerry Wind, 1995. "Introduction to the Special Issue: Empirical Generalizations in Marketing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3_supplem), pages 1-5.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Armatas, Christopher A. & Borrie, William T., 2025. "A pragmatist ecological economics - Normative foundations and a framework for actionable knowledge," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    2. Guo, Chiquan, 2004. "Marketing research: Cui bono?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 33-38.
    3. Witell, Lars & Gebauer, Heiko & Jaakkola, Elina & Hammedi, Wafa & Patricio, Lia & Perks, Helen, 2017. "A bricolage perspective on service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 290-298.
    4. Alroomi, Azzam & Karamatzanis, Georgios & Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos & Tilba, Anna & Xiao, Shujun, 2022. "Fathoming empirical forecasting competitions’ winners," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1519-1525.
    5. Francisco J. Conejo & Lawrence F. Cunningham & Clifford E. Young, 2020. "Revisiting the Brand Luxury Index: new empirical evidence and future directions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 108-122, January.
    6. Bryan Hochstein & Willy Bolander & Ronald Goldsmith & Christopher R. Plouffe, 2019. "Adapting influence approaches to informed consumers in high-involvement purchases: are salespeople really doomed?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 118-137, January.
    7. Eeva-Liisa Oikarinen, 2023. "The Boundaries of a Small Company’s Human Voice: Insights into Dark Humour in Internet Recruitment Advertising," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 223-241, August.
    8. van Heerde, Harald J. & Dekimpe, Marnik G., 2024. "Household and retail panel data in retailing research: Time for a renaissance?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 104-113.
    9. Daugherty, Terry & Hoffman, Ernest & Kennedy, Kathleen, 2016. "Research in reverse: Ad testing using an inductive consumer neuroscience approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3168-3176.
    10. Jack R. Meredith, 2001. "Reconsidering the Philosophical Basis of OR/MS," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 325-333, June.
    11. Verlegh, Peeter W. J. & Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M., 1999. "A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 521-546, October.
    12. Roberta Gabriela Basílio & Mateus Canniatti Ponchio & Rafaela Almeida Cordeiro, 2024. "Examining unethical sales practices in retail banking: a hermeneutic analysis of employee perceptions in Brazil," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(4), pages 1304-1317, December.
    13. Jonker, J.-J. & Piersma, N. & Van den Poel, D., 2002. "Joint optimization of customer segmentation and marketing policy to maximize long-term profitability," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2002-18, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    14. Kate Robinson & Bernard McKenna & David Rooney, 2022. "The Relationship of Risk to Rules, Values, Virtues, and Moral Complexity: What We can Learn from the Moral Struggles of Military Leaders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 749-766, September.
    15. Marianela Fornerino, 2002. "Les modèles de diffusion d'innovations en marketing et l'adoption d'Internet en France," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00455217, HAL.
    16. Wilma E. Waterlander & Angie Luna Pinzon & Arnoud Verhoeff & Karen den Hertog & Teatske Altenburg & Coosje Dijkstra & Jutka Halberstadt & Roel Hermans & Carry Renders & Jacob Seidell & Amika Singh & M, 2020. "A System Dynamics and Participatory Action Research Approach to Promote Healthy Living and a Healthy Weight among 10–14-Year-Old Adolescents in Amsterdam: The LIKE Programme," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-18, July.
    17. H Peyton Young & Lucas Merrill Brown, 2016. "The Diffusion of a Social Innovation: Executive Stock Options from 1936," Economics Series Working Papers 777, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    18. Stijn Viaene & Bart Baesens & Dirk Van den Poel & Guido Dedene & Jan Vanthienen, 2001. "Wrapped input selection using multilayer perceptrons for repeat‐purchase modeling in direct marketing," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(2), pages 115-126, June.
    19. Vespestad, May Kristin & Clancy, Anne, 2021. "Exploring the use of content analysis methodology in consumer research," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    20. Debenedetti, Alain & Chaney, Damien, 2024. "From feeling like home to being at home: The negative outcomes of attachment to commercial places," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp01772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.