IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/wpaper/wp20-3.html

Global Value Chains and the Removal of Trade Protection

Author

Listed:
  • Chad P. Bown

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Aksel Erbahar

    (Erasmus School of Economics)

  • Maurizio Zanardi

    (Lancaster University Management School)

Abstract

This paper examines how trade protection is affected by changes in the value-added content of production arising through global value chains (GVCs). Exploiting a new set of World Trade Organization (WTO) rules adopted in 1995 that impose an exogenously timed requirement for countries to reevaluate their previously imposed trade protection, we adopt an instrumental variables strategy and identify the causal effect of GVC integration on the likelihood that a trade barrier is removed. Using a newly constructed dataset of protection removal decisions involving 10 countries, 41 trading partners, and 18 industries over 1995-2013, we find that bilateral industry-specific domestic value-added growth in foreign production significantly raises the probability of removing a duty. The results are not limited to imports from China but are only found for the protection decisions of high-income countries. Back-of-the-envelope calculations indicate that rapid GVC growth in the 2000s freed almost a third of the trade flows subject to the most common temporary restrictions (i.e., antidumping) applied by high-income countries in 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Chad P. Bown & Aksel Erbahar & Maurizio Zanardi, 2020. "Global Value Chains and the Removal of Trade Protection," Working Paper Series WP20-3, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:wpaper:wp20-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/working-papers/global-value-chains-and-removal-trade-protection
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chad Brown & Paola Conconi & Aksel Erbahar & Lorenzo Trimarchi, 2020. "Trade Protection Along Supply Chains," Working Papers ECARES 2020-52, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Nenci, Silvia & Fusacchia, Ilaria & Giunta, Anna & Montalbano, Pierluigi & Pietrobelli, Carlo, . "Mapping global value chain participation and positioning in agriculture and food: stylised facts, empirical evidence and critical issues," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 11(2).
    3. Banerjee, Shantanu & Homroy, Swarnodeep & Slechten, Aurélie, 2022. "Stakeholder preference and strategic corporate social responsibility," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Dinh Trung Nguyen, 2025. "Structural reforms and global value chains: a dynamic analysis of OECD countries based on local projections," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1-31, July.
    5. Xian‐nan Cheng & Shuhui Wen & Nuobing Fan & Yuwei Liu & Yujing Wang, 2024. "What's the influence of input's variation? Estimating the input elasticity in the global value chain," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 2034-2062, May.
    6. Lionel Fontagné & Nadia Rocha & Michele Ruta & Gianluca Santoni, 2023. "The Economic Impact of Deepening Trade Agreements," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 37(3), pages 366-388.
    7. Irene Iodice & Camille Reverdy & Irene Iodice, 2025. "Protection or Protectionism: The Effect of Technical Regulations on Input Sourcing," CESifo Working Paper Series 11829, CESifo.
    8. Andreas Baur & Lisandra Flach & Isabella Gourevich & Florian Unger, 2023. "North-South Trade: The Impact of Robotization," CESifo Working Paper Series 10865, CESifo.
    9. Eric Mokwaro Bosire, 2023. "Viewpoints in Global Value Chains: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 13(1), pages 13-28, January.
    10. Michael Blanga-Gubbay & Paola Conconi & Mathieu Parenti, 2025. "Lobbying for Globalisation," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 135(666), pages 487-518.
    11. Valentina Raimondi & Andreea Piriu & Johan Swinnen & Alessandro Olper, 2023. "Impact of global value chains on tariffs and non-tariff measures in agriculture and food," Post-Print hal-04991950, HAL.
    12. Weixin Yang & Hao Gao & Yunpeng Yang, 2022. "Analysis of Influencing Factors of Embodied Carbon in China’s Export Trade in the Background of “Carbon Peak” and “Carbon Neutrality”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Leonardo Baccini & Arianna Bondi & Matteo Fiorini, 2023. "Global Value Chains and the Design of Trade Agreements," RSCAS Working Papers 2013_56, European University Institute.
    14. Magdalene Silberberger & Anja Slany & Christian Soegaard & Frederik Stender, 2022. "The Aftermath of Anti-Dumping: Are Temporary Trade Barriers Really Temporary?," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 677-704, September.
    15. Rudi Purwono & Unggul Heriqbaldi & Miguel Angel Esquivias & M. Khoerul Mubin, 2022. "The American–China Trade War and Spillover Effects on Value-Added Exports from Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    16. Garcés, Irene & Vogt, Achim, 2024. "Global value chain integration and non-tariff measures," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    17. Min Zhu & Thomas J. Prusa, 2023. "The impact of preferential trade agreements on the duration of antidumping protection," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 553-592, May.
    18. Cecilia Bellora & Lionel Fontagné, 2019. "Shooting Oneself in the Foot? Trade War and Global Value Chains," Working Papers 2019-18, CEPII research center.
    19. Shadrack Muthami Mwatu & Charity Kageni Mbaka & John Gakuu Karanja & Grace Mukami Muriithi, 2024. "Trade Agreements, Technical Regulations, and Standards: Competitiveness Implications for Kenyan Exporters to European Union," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(2), pages 381-410, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F68 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:wpaper:wp20-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.