Transparent Restrictions on Beliefs and Forward Induction Reasoning in Games with Asymmetric Information
We analyze forward-induction reasoning in games with asymmetric information assuming some commonly understood restrictions on beliefs. Specifically, we assume that some given restrictions ? on players' initial or conditional first-order beliefs are transparent, that is, not only the restrictions ? hold, but there is common belief in ? at every node. Most applied models of asymmetric information are covered as special cases whereby ? pins down the probabilities initially assigned to states of nature. But the abstract analysis also allows for transparent restrictions on beliefs about behavior, e.g. independence restrictions or restrictions induced by the context behind the game. Our contribution is twofold. First, we use dynamic interactive epistemology to formalize assumptions that capture foward-induction reasoning given the transparency of ?, and show that the behavioral implications of these assumptions are characterized by the ?-rationalizability solution procedure of Battigalli (1999, 2003). Second, we study the differences and similarities between this solution concept and a simpler solution procedure put forward by Battigalli and Siniscalchi (2003). We show that the two procedures are equivalent if ? is "closed under compositions", a property that holds in all the applications considered by Battigalli and Siniscalchi (2003). We also show that when ? is not closed under compositions the simpler solution procedure may fail to characterize the behavioral implications of forward induction reasoning. J.E.L. Classification Numbers: C72, C73, D82. KEYWORDS: Epistemic game theory, Rationalizability, Forward induction, Transparent restrictions on beliefs.
|Date of creation:||2011|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: via Rontgen, 1 - 20136 Milano (Italy)|
Web page: http://www.igier.unibocconi.it/
|Order Information:|| Web: http://www.igier.unibocconi.it/en/papers/index.htm Email: |
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Robert J. Aumann, 2010.
"Correlated Equilibrium as an expression of Bayesian Rationality,"
Levine's Working Paper Archive
661465000000000377, David K. Levine.
- Aumann, Robert J, 1987. "Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 1-18, January.
- R. Aumann, 2010. "Correlated Equilibrium as an expression of Bayesian Rationality," Levine's Bibliography 513, UCLA Department of Economics.
- Makoto Shimoji & Paul Schweinzer, 2012.
"Implementation without Incentive Compatibility: Two Stories with Partially Informed Planners,"
12/21, Department of Economics, University of York.
- Shimoji, Makoto & Schweinzer, Paul, 2015. "Implementation without incentive compatibility: Two stories with partially informed planners," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 258-267.
- Martin J. Osborne & Ariel Rubinstein, 1994.
"A Course in Game Theory,"
MIT Press Books,
The MIT Press,
edition 1, volume 1, number 0262650401, December.
- Cappelletti Giuseppe, 2010.
"A Note on Rationalizability and Restrictions on Beliefs,"
The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics,
De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, September.
- Giuseppe Cappelletti, 2010. "A note on rationalizability and restrictions on belief," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 757, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
- Battigalli, Pierpaolo & Friedenberg, Amanda, 2012. "Forward induction reasoning revisited," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 7(1), January.
- Adam Brandenburger & Amanda Friedenberg, 2014.
World Scientific Book Chapters,
in: The Language of Game Theory Putting Epistemics into the Mathematics of Games, chapter 8, pages 213-249
World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
- Pierpaolo Battigalli & Amanda Friedenberg, 2009. "Context-Dependent Forward Induction Reasoning," Working Papers 351, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igi:igierp:376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.