IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iae/iaewps/wp2025n01.html

Working from Home and the Consequences for Labour Turnover and Career Progression

Author

Listed:
  • Irma Mooi-Reci

    (School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Melbourne)

  • Mark Wooden

    (Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne)

Abstract

In the wake of the rapid growth in working from home (WFH) there has been renewed interest in the impacts of this form of employment. One area of contention is job mobility and career progression. WFH is often argued to improve job satisfaction and thus enhance employee retention. In contrast, the lesser visibility of remote workers and the possible stigma associated with WFH might make them less likely to be promoted and more likely to be dismissed. This study tests these conflicting hypotheses using longitudinal data involving up to almost 150,000 observations on employees collected over a 21-year period from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey. Fixed-effects regression models of five different outcomes are estimated. Strong results are mostly confined to those that work exclusively from home, more marked for subjective outcomes than objective outcomes and, in the case of objective outcomes, restricted to men. Among male employees, WFH all the time is associated with fewer quits but more dismissals. No such associations are found for females. Hybrid arrangements are also associated with a lower likelihood of promotion for men. These findings suggest that WFH may come at a career price, but only for men.

Suggested Citation

  • Irma Mooi-Reci & Mark Wooden, 2025. "Working from Home and the Consequences for Labour Turnover and Career Progression," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2025n01, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
  • Handle: RePEc:iae:iaewps:wp2025n01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://melbourneinstitute.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/5258072/wp2025n01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duanyi Yang & Erin L. Kelly & Laura D. Kubzansky & Lisa Berkman, 2023. "Working from Home and Worker Well-being: New Evidence from Germany," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 76(3), pages 504-531, May.
    2. Nicholas Bloom & Ruobing Han & James Liang, 2024. "Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance," Nature, Nature, vol. 630(8018), pages 920-925, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yue Qian & Wen Fan, 2026. "Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Make It Worse? Working from Home and Affective Well-Being at the Intersections of Parental Status and Occupation," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 79(2), pages 310-332, March.
    2. Philippe Askenazy & Ugo Di Nallo & Ismaël Ramajo & Conrad Thiounn, 2025. "Teleworking in the French private sector: a lasting but heterogenous shift shaped by collective agreements (2019- 2024)," Working Papers hal-05291266, HAL.
    3. repec:rim:rimwps:25-04 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Tony Fang & Emin Gahramanov & Ming Hui & Xueli Tang, 2026. "Remote work intensity and wages: evidence from a representative canadian labour force survey," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Christos A. Makridis, 2025. "The Allocation of Time and Remote Work," CESifo Working Paper Series 12363, CESifo.
    6. Nicholas Bloom & Gordon B. Dahl & Dan-Olof Rooth, 2026. "Work from Home and Disability Employment," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 179-195, June.
    7. Bensnes, Simon & Hernaes, Øystein & King, Max-Emil M., 2025. "No Payoff from Time Off? Mandated Paid Vacation and Late-Career Employment," IZA Discussion Papers 18121, IZA Network @ LISER.
    8. Gagné, Marylène & Olafsen, Anja H. & Carpini, Joseph A. & Frølund, Claus W., 2026. "Self-determination theory in the workplace: the evolution, present, and beyond," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    9. Jirjahn, Uwe & Rienzo, Cinzia, 2025. "Working from Home and Mental Health: Giving Employees a Choice Does Make a Difference," IZA Discussion Papers 18187, IZA Network @ LISER.
    10. Aksoy, Cevat Giray & Bloom, Nicholas & Davis, Steven & Marino, Victoria & Özgüzel, Cem, 2026. "The Value of One Office Day a Month," CEPR Discussion Papers 21597, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    11. Yunhan Zheng & Jinhua Zhao, 2026. "Remote work expands pathways to upward career mobility," Papers 2605.01268, arXiv.org.
    12. repec:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:14:p:1430-1442 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. repec:bjc:journl:v:13:y:2026:i:6:p:5817-5829 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Olga Kokshagina & Marc Santolini & Christoph Riedl, 2026. "The Attention-Directing Ability of Teams," Papers 2607.26109, arXiv.org.
    15. Yoon, Chungeun, 2026. "The direction of innovation and work from home," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(1).
    16. Junze Shi & Dariusz Wójcik, 2026. "Back to the office: How proximity survived the pandemic in financial centres," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 58(3), pages 352-369, May.
    17. Inga Laß & Esperanza Vera-Toscano & Mark Wooden, 2025. "Working from Home, COVID-19, and Job Satisfaction," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 78(2), pages 330-354, March.
    18. Francesca Foliano & Rebecca Riley & Lynsey Brown, 2026. "The Changing Nature of Work: What Can We Learn from Time Use Diaries?," NBER Chapters, in: The Changing Nature of Work, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Mancha, André & Peres, Elisa, 2026. "Home (not so) sweet home: Remote work and medical leaves in Brazil," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    20. Jose Maria Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Kathryn Bonney & Cory Breaux & Catherine Buffington & Steven J. Davis & Lucia Foster & Brian McKenzie & Keith Savage & Cristina Tello-Trillo, 2026. "Tapping Business and Household Surveys to Sharpen Our View of Work from Home," NBER Chapters, in: The Changing Nature of Work, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    21. Simon Krause & Andreas Trumpp & Tobias Dichtl & Susanne Kiese & Alexander Rutsch, 2024. "The Impact of Working from Home on the German Office Real Estate Market," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 25(05), pages 52-58, September.
    22. Piotr Lewandowski & Katarzyna Lipowska & Mateusz Smoter, 2026. "Mismatch in Preferences for Working from Home: Evidence from Discrete Choice Experiments with Workers and Employers," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 79(1), pages 142-172, January.
    23. Zs'ofia Z'ador & Bal'azs Lengyel & Riccardo Di Clemente, 2026. "Workplace dependence in urban economies," Papers 2608.07588, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J63 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Turnover; Vacancies; Layoffs
    • M51 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Firm Employment Decisions; Promotions

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iae:iaewps:wp2025n01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sheri Carnegie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mimelau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.