IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05132106.html

Learning to Learn Differently: Studio-Based Education for Responsible Management

Author

Listed:
  • A. Ryan
  • C. Morel

    (Audencia Business School)

  • J. Goodman

    (Audencia Business School)

  • J. Hermes
  • M. Rehman
  • C. Celine Louche
  • A. Keränen
  • M. Juntunen

Abstract

The pressing need to address the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in business education demands a shift from traditional teaching methods toward design-inspired pedagogical models. This paper introduces a specific pedagogical innovation, that is, a Design for Iteration (DFI) strategy embedded within a studio-based learning environment, developed through a cross-institutional partnership to educate future business leaders. The studio model emphasizes experiential, visual, and iterative learning processes such as the ‘crit', prototyping, and peer-led feedback. Anchored in a heutagogical (self-determined) approach, this innovation moves beyond isolated creative exercises toward sustained engagement with complex, real-world sustainability challenges. Drawing on qualitative data from the implementation of the EULab Nantes studio, the paper explores how iterative, practice-based learning develops critical skills in adaptive thinking, problem-framing, collaboration, and system-level inquiry. The findings underscore the role of socio-materiality and peer-led sense-making in shaping meaningful learning and identifies the studio as a space for cultivating the mindsets and capabilities central to responsible management and sustainability education. By foregrounding the studio as a site for prototyping sustainable market futures, the paper contributes to reimagining business schools as platforms for transformative sustainability learning.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Ryan & C. Morel & J. Goodman & J. Hermes & M. Rehman & C. Celine Louche & A. Keränen & M. Juntunen, 2025. "Learning to Learn Differently: Studio-Based Education for Responsible Management," Post-Print hal-05132106, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05132106
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101177
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05132106v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05132106v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mollie Painter-Morland & Ehsan Sabet & Petra Molthan-Hill & Helen Goworek & Sander Leeuw, 2016. "Beyond the Curriculum: Integrating Sustainability into Business Schools," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(4), pages 737-754, December.
    2. Spiggle, Susan, 1994. "Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 491-503, December.
    3. Rieneke Slager & Sareh Pouryousefi & Jeremy Moon & Ethan D. Schoolman, 2020. "Sustainability Centres and Fit: How Centres Work to Integrate Sustainability Within Business Schools," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 375-391, January.
    4. Domenico Dentoni & Verena Bitzer & Greetje Schouten, 2018. "Harnessing Wicked Problems in Multi-stakeholder Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 333-356, June.
    5. Kari-Pekka Heikkinen & Blair Stevenson, 2016. "The LAB studio model: enhancing entrepreneurship skills in higher education," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(2), pages 154-168.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daly, Bonita A. & Schuler, Drue K., 1998. "Redefining a certified public accounting firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(5-6), pages 549-567.
    2. Scott Slater & Mark Lawrence & Benjamin Wood & Paulo Serodio & Amber Akker & Phillip Baker, 2025. "The rise of multi-stakeholderism, the power of ultra-processed food corporations, and the implications for global food governance: a network analysis," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(1), pages 177-192, March.
    3. Nicoletta Buratti & Francesco Derchi & Giorgia Profumo, 2015. "The blurred boundary between empowered and working consumers: insights from the winner taco case," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(4), pages 133-156.
    4. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    5. repec:oup:jecgeo:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:282-302. is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Srivardhini K. Jha & E. Richard Gold & Laurette Dubé, 2021. "Modular Interorganizational Network Governance: A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Complex Social Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Margareet Visser & Matthew Alford, 2024. "Governance and Power Across Intersecting Value Chains: The Case of South African Apples," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 69-86, January.
    8. Cristel Russell & Dale Russell & Jill Klein, 2011. "Ambivalence toward a country and consumers’ willingness to buy emblematic brands: The differential predictive validity of objective and subjective ambivalence measures on behavior," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 357-371, November.
    9. Katja H. Brunk & Cara Boer, 2020. "How do Consumers Reconcile Positive and Negative CSR-Related Information to Form an Ethical Brand Perception? A Mixed Method Inquiry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 443-458, January.
    10. Tom Joerß & Payam Akbar & Robert Mai & Stefan Hoffmann, 2017. "Conceptualizing sustainability from a consumer perspective [Konzeptionalisierung der Nachhaltigkeit aus der Konsumentensicht]," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 15-23, June.
    11. Veronica Devenin & Constanza Bianchi, 2018. "Soccer fields? What for? Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility initiatives in the mining industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 866-879, September.
    12. Awad, Mohamed Hassan, 2023. "Everything, all the time: Engaging the social problem of homelessness in entrepreneurship research and practice," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    13. Rindell, Anne & Strandvik, Tore, 2023. "To be or not to be corporate heritage oriented? A study of managers’ corporate heritage mindsets," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 282-291.
    14. Said Sarabi, 2016. "Development Optimal Strategies for Media Policy of IRIB on Issue of Climate Change," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 115-115, February.
    15. Jon Reast & François Maon & Adam Lindgreen & Joëlle Vanhamme, 2013. "Legitimacy-Seeking Organizational Strategies in Controversial Industries: A Case Study Analysis and a Bidimensional Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 139-153, November.
    16. Monica C. LaBarge & Martin Pyle, 2020. "Staying in “the works of living”: How older adults employ marketplace resources to age successfully," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 742-774, June.
    17. Daisy Bertrand & Pierre-Yves Léo & Jean Philippe, 2019. "The New Go-Between Services: Peer-To-Peer Sharing Platforms In Hospitality Services," Post-Print hal-02299130, HAL.
    18. Sara Belisari & Daniele Binci & Andrea Appolloni, 2020. "E-Procurement Adoption: A Case Study about the Role of Two Italian Advisory Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Anup Raj & Andrei Kuznetsov & Thankom Gopinath Arun, 2020. "Culture of Sustainability and Marketing Orientation of Indian Agribusiness in implementing CSR Programs—Insights from Emerging Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Matthew Walker & Stephen Hills & Bob Heere, 2017. "Evaluating a Socially Responsible Employment Program: Beneficiary Impacts and Stakeholder Perceptions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 53-70, June.
    21. Moal-Ulvoas, Gaëlle, 2017. "Positive emotions and spirituality in older travelers," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 151-158.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05132106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.