IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gre/wpaper/2026-21.html

Air Pollution and Climate-Mitigation Innovation: A Spatial Optimal Control Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Bargna

    (Department of Economics, Insubria University, Varese, Italy)

  • Davide La Torre

    (SKEMA Business School, Université Côte d'Azur, France)

  • Benjamin Montmartin

    (SKEMA Business School, France
    Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, GREDEG, France)

  • Lionel Nesta

    (Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, GREDEG, France
    OFCE, Sciences Po, France
    SKEMA Business School, France)

Abstract

We develop a spatial optimal-control model in which air pollution and climate-mitigation innovation evolve jointly through a coupled reaction–diffusion system. We characterize stability and optimal policy, derive closed-form controls under spatial homogeneity, and obtain bounds for nonlinear dynamics. Using data from 1,181 European NUTS 3 regions over 2005–2020, we estimate the reaction–diffusion dynamics and simulate the optimal policy mix under alternative welfare valuations of pollution-generating activities. Pollution exhibits strong spatial diffusion, whereas innovation diffusion is limited. Innovation is associated with lower subsequent pollution growth, while higher pollution is followed by stronger innovation growth. The optimal policy mix combines environmental regulation and innovation support, but their timing and persistence differ. Abatement may be immediate or delayed depending on the net welfare contribution of pollution-generating activities, while sustained innovation support depends on the value assigned to the terminal innovation stock.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Bargna & Davide La Torre & Benjamin Montmartin & Lionel Nesta, 2026. "Air Pollution and Climate-Mitigation Innovation: A Spatial Optimal Control Approach," GREDEG Working Papers 2026-21, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
  • Handle: RePEc:gre:wpaper:2026-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://195.220.190.85/GREDEG-WP-2026-21.pdf
    File Function: First version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boucekkine, Raouf & Camacho, Carmen & Zou, Benteng, 2009. "Bridging The Gap Between Growth Theory And The New Economic Geography: The Spatial Ramsey Model," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 20-45, February.
    2. Stokey, Nancy L, 1998. "Are There Limits to Growth?," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 39(1), pages 1-31, February.
    3. Raffaele Paci & Stefano Usai, 2009. "Knowledge flows across European regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 43(3), pages 669-690, September.
    4. Bracht, Felix & Verhoeven, Dennis, 2025. "Air pollution and innovation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    5. Bagayev, Igor & Kogler, Dieter F. & Lochard, Julie, 2025. "Does environmental regulation drive specialisation in green innovation?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    6. La Torre, Davide & Liuzzi, Danilo & Marsiglio, Simone, 2015. "Pollution diffusion and abatement activities across space and over time," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 48-63.
    7. Chen, Zhuo & Wang, Kunlun, 2025. "How air pollution affects innovation value in China urban area?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(PA).
    8. Acemoglu, Daron & Akcigit, Ufuk & Hanley, Douglas & Kerr, William, 2021. "Transition to clean technology," CEPR Press Book Chapters, in: Weder di Mauro, Beatrice (ed.), Combating Climate Change: A CEPR Collection, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 11, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    9. Enrico Pisoni & Stefano Zauli-Sajani & Claudio A. Belis & Sasha Khomenko & Philippe Thunis & Corrado Motta & Rita Dingenen & Bertrand Bessagnet & Fabio Monforti-Ferrario & Joachim Maes & Luc Feyen, 2025. "High resolution assessment of air quality and health in Europe under different climate mitigation scenarios," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Bronwyn H. Hall & Adam Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg, 2005. "Market Value and Patent Citations," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 36(1), pages 16-38, Spring.
    11. Deng, Yi, 2007. "Private value of European patents," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(7), pages 1785-1812, October.
    12. Daron Acemoglu & Philippe Aghion & Leonardo Bursztyn & David Hemous, 2012. "The Environment and Directed Technical Change," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(1), pages 131-166, February.
    13. Nick Johnstone & Ivan Haščič & David Popp, 2017. "Erratum to: Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(2), pages 441-444, October.
    14. Nicholas Z. Muller & Robert Mendelsohn, 2012. "Efficient Pollution Regulation: Getting the Prices Right: Corrigendum (Mortality Rate Update)," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(1), pages 613-616, February.
    15. C. V. Pao, 1992. "Nonlinear Parabolic and Elliptic Equations," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-1-4615-3034-3, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng, Siyu & Lazkano, Itziar, 2022. "Innovation trends in electricity storage: What drives global innovation?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Lazkano, Itziar & Nøstbakken, Linda & Pelli, Martino, 2017. "From fossil fuels to renewables: The role of electricity storage," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 113-129.
    3. Paulo Vitor Levate & Eduardo Gonçalves & Juliana Gonçalves Taveira, 2021. "Regional drivers of green inventions in OECD countries," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 335-354, December.
    4. Zhangsheng Liu & Liuqingqing Yang & Liqin Fan, 2021. "Induced Effect of Environmental Regulation on Green Innovation: Evidence from the Increasing-Block Pricing Scheme," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Xu, Qi & Liu, Kui, 2024. "Hero or Devil: A comparison of different carbon tax policies for China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    6. Rik Rozendaal & Herman Vollebergh, 2025. "Policy-Induced Innovation in Clean Technologies: Evidence from the Car Market," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 12(3), pages 565-598.
    7. Lööf, Hans & Perez, Luis & Baum, Christopher F, 2018. "Directed Technical Change in Clean Energy: Evidence from the Solar Industry," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 470, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    8. Adao, Bernardino & Narajabad, Borghan & Temzelides, Ted, 2012. "Renewable Technology Adoption and the Macroeconomy," Working Papers 14-007, Rice University, Department of Economics.
    9. Oscar Afonso & Ana Catarina Afonso, 2015. "Endogenous Growth Effects of Environmental Policies," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 62(5), pages 607-629, December.
    10. Bilal Çayır & Onur Yeni, 2026. "Path-dependent energy innovation under carbon pricing and subsidy policies: challenges for Europe’s net-zero transition," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 53(2), pages 565-593, May.
    11. Cameron Hepburn & Jacquelyn Pless & David Popp, 2018. "Policy Brief—Encouraging Innovation that Protects Environmental Systems: Five Policy Proposals," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 12(1), pages 154-169.
    12. Raphael Calel & Antoine Dechezleprêtre, 2016. "Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European Carbon Market," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 98(1), pages 173-191, March.
    13. Rui Dai & Rui Duan & Lilian Ng, 2026. "Innovating Green: Competition Meets Regulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 2398-2426, March.
    14. Shi, Guifeng & Xi, Yiyang, 2026. "The unintended consequences of the area-based evaluation mechanism reform on green innovation: Evidence from highly polluting firms in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Adão, Bernardino & Narajabad, Borghan & Temzelides, Ted, 2024. "Renewable technology adoption costs and economic growth," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    16. Eriksson, Clas, 2018. "Phasing out a polluting input in a growth model with directed technological change," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 461-474.
    17. Ahlvik, Lassi & van den Bijgaart, Inge, 2024. "Screening green innovation through carbon pricing," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    18. Frauke G. Braun & Jens Schmidt-Ehmcke & Petra Zloczysti, 2010. "Innovative Activity in Wind and Solar Technology: Empirical Evidence on Knowledge Spillovers Using Patent Data," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 993, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    19. Barbieri, Nicolò & Marzucchi, Alberto & Rizzo, Ugo, 2023. "Green technologies, interdependencies, and policy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    20. Gugler, Klaus & Szücs, Florian & Wiedenhofer, Thomas, 2024. "Environmental Policies and directed technological change," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gre:wpaper:2026-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Patrice Bougette (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/credcfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.