Author
Abstract
Women with disabilities may face heightened risks of intimate partner violence (IPV) given the discrimination and barriers they face in society. While some country-specific studies explore the link between disability and IPV, cross-country research remains limited. Using internationally comparable data for women aged 15–49 from 11 countries (Cambodia, Haiti, Kenya, Mali, Mauritania, Pakistan, Rwanda, Senegal, South Africa, Timor-Leste, and Uganda), we assess whether women with disabilities consistently face higher IPV risks. Controlling for socioeconomic and demographic factors, women with disabilities have a six percentage point higher risk of IPV compared to those without (p<0.05) in the pooled sample. At the country level, this association is significant in five countries. The link between disability and IPV also varies by type, with stronger associations for severe physical IPV (seven countries) and weaker for sexual IPV (two countries). Logit decomposition analysis in the five countries where the disability gap in exposure to IPV is significant shows that observed differences in characteristics account for part of the gap. However, unobserved factors, such as stigma, also play a significant role in driving the disparity. Additionally, our results suggest that the lack of consistent findings across countries may result from data limitations, such as small sample sizes, measurement errors, and reporting biases. This underscores the importance of developing evidence-based approaches to better measure disability and IPV in household surveys.
Suggested Citation
Justine Herve & Katherine Theiss & Sophie Mitra, 2025.
"Are women with disabilities more at risk of intimate partner violence?,"
Fordham Economics Discussion Paper Series
dp2025-01er:dp2025-01, Fordham University, Department of Economics.
Handle:
RePEc:frd:wpaper:dp2025-01er:dp2025-01
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:frd:wpaper:dp2025-01er:dp2025-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fordham Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edforus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.