IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedgfe/2025-104.html

Artificial Intelligence Innovation by Financial Innovators: Evidence from US Patents

Author

Listed:
  • Jean Xiao Timmerman

Abstract

This paper examines the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) patent rates (i.e., the number of AI patents/number of firms of the same type) and concentration metrics (i.e., the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) and Gini coefficient) among financial market participants from 2000 to 2020. It documents the historical trajectories of AI innovation for regulated banking entities and less-regulated firms, revealing that nonfinancial companies exhibit the highest baseline AI patent rate, while banks show the highest growth in AI patent rate over time. Banks have the highest HHI, and nonfinancial companies have the highest Gini coefficient, suggesting that a small number of banks dominate AI innovation and the distribution of AI innovation at nonfinancial firms � though higher in number � is highly skewed toward a subset of players. These findings indicate that the AI technological gap between small and large banks may be widening and the diversity of nonfinancial companies serving as third-party AI service providers may be limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean Xiao Timmerman, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence Innovation by Financial Innovators: Evidence from US Patents," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2025-104, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedgfe:2025-104
    DOI: 10.17016/FEDS.2025.104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/feds/files/2025104pap.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17016/FEDS.2025.104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Praveen Kumar & Stuart M. Turnbull, 2008. "Optimal Patenting and Licensing of Financial Innovations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(12), pages 2012-2023, December.
    2. Arts, Sam & Hou, Jianan & Gomez, Juan Carlos, 2021. "Natural language processing to identify the creation and impact of new technologies in patent text: Code, data, and new measures," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(2).
    3. Litan, Robert E., 2010. "In Defense of Much, but Not All, Financial Innovation," Working Papers 10-06, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Weiss Center.
    4. Shahsuzan Zakaria & Suhaily Maizan Abdul Manaf & Mohd Talmizie Amron & Mohd Taufik Mohd Suffian, 2023. "Has the World of Finance Changed? A Review of the Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Financial Management Studies," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(4), pages 420-432.
    5. Bryan Kelly & Dimitris Papanikolaou & Amit Seru & Matt Taddy, 2021. "Measuring Technological Innovation over the Long Run," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 3(3), pages 303-320, September.
    6. Daníelsson, Jón & Macrae, Robert & Uthemann, Andreas, 2022. "Artificial intelligence and systemic risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    7. Erik Feyen & Jon Frost & Leonardo Gambacorta & Harish Natarajan & Matthew Saal, 2021. "Fintech and the digital transformation of financial services: implications for market structure and public policy," BIS Papers, Bank for International Settlements, number 117.
    8. W. Scott Frame & Lawrence J. White, 2004. "Empirical Studies of Financial Innovation: Lots of Talk, Little Action?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 42(1), pages 116-144, March.
    9. Doerr, Sebastian & Frost, Jon & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Shreeti, Vatsala, 2023. "Big techs in finance," CEPR Discussion Papers 18665, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    10. Josh Lerner & Amit Seru & Nicholas Short & Yuan Sun, 2024. "Financial Innovation in the Twenty-First Century: Evidence from US Patents," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 132(5), pages 1391-1449.
    11. Patrick Weber & K. Valerie Carl & Oliver Hinz, 2024. "Applications of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Finance—a systematic review of Finance, Information Systems, and Computer Science literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 867-907, June.
    12. Bena, Jan & Ferreira, Miguel A & Matos, Pedro & Pires, Pedro, 2017. "Are foreign investors locusts? The long-term effects of foreign institutional ownership," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 122-146.
    13. ., 1999. "Financial Futures: A Global Innovation," Chapters, in: Foundations of Futures Markets, chapter 4, pages 48-64, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Cohen, Wesley M., 2010. "Fifty Years of Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity and Performance," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 129-213, Elsevier.
    15. Gang Kou & Yang Lu, 2025. "FinTech: a literature review of emerging financial technologies and applications," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-34, December.
    16. Silber, William L, 1983. "The Process of Financial Innovation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(2), pages 89-95, May.
    17. Alexander V. Giczy & Nicholas A. Pairolero & Andrew A. Toole, 2022. "Identifying artificial intelligence (AI) invention: a novel AI patent dataset," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 476-505, April.
    18. Nicholas A. Pairolero & Alexander V. Giczy & Gerard Torres & Tisa Islam Erana & Mark A. Finlayson & Andrew A. Toole, 2025. "The artificial intelligence patent dataset (AIPD) 2023 update," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2587-2610, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heikki Marjosola, 2021. "The problem of regulatory arbitrage: A transaction cost economics perspective," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 388-407, April.
    2. Jaehyuk Park, 2024. "Analyzing the direct role of governmental organizations in artificial intelligence innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 437-465, April.
    3. Hanming Fang & Xian Gu & Hanyin Yan & Wu Zhu, 2026. "AI Patents in the United States and China: Measurement, Organization, and Knowledge Flows," Papers 2604.10529, arXiv.org.
    4. Neil Fligstein, 2021. "Innovation and the theory of fields," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 272-289, December.
    5. Anastasios Evgenidis & Apostolos Fasianos, 2025. "AI news shocks and the macroeconomy: evidence from UK patent data," IFS Working Papers W25/48, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    6. Escolar, Emerson G. & Hiraoka, Yasuaki & Igami, Mitsuru & Ozcan, Yasin, 2023. "Mapping firms’ locations in technological space: A topological analysis of patent statistics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    7. El-Yaqub, Ahmad B & Yahaya Ismail, 2025. "Impact of Digital Currency on Deposit Money Bank in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(1), pages 1363-1377, January.
    8. Max Nathan & Anna Rosso, 2017. "Innovative events," Development Working Papers 429, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano, revised 08 Apr 2019.
    9. Dominic Atogumsekiya Anarigide & Haruna Issahaku & Stanley Kojo Dary, 2023. "Drivers of financial innovation in sub-Saharan Africa," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(9), pages 1-21, September.
    10. Christian Rutzer & Dragan Filimonovic & Jeffrey T. Macher & Rolf Weder, 2026. "Towards Measuring Disruptive Innovation Across Countries," Papers 2603.17881, arXiv.org.
    11. Jörn Block & Leif Brändle & Peter Limbach & Tobias Röth & Christopher Albert Sabel, 2025. "Half dead or more alive than ever? New, old, and (increasingly) redundant literature review formats," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 993-1008, June.
    12. Dongqing Chen & Chaoqun Ma & Liwei Zhang & Lijie Li, 2025. "Unraveling the role of data sharing in open finance diffusion: an evolutionary game approach on complex networks," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, December.
    13. Doblinger, Claudia & Surana, Kavita & Li, Deyu & Hultman, Nathan & Anadón, Laura Díaz, 2022. "How do global manufacturing shifts affect long-term clean energy innovation? A study of wind energy suppliers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(7).
    14. Yang, Alex J., 2025. "Text vs. citations: A comparative analysis of breakthrough and disruption metrics in patent innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    15. Nathan, Max & Rosso, Anna, 2022. "Innovative events: product launches, innovation and firm performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    16. Laeven, Luc & Levine, Ross & Michalopoulos, Stelios, 2015. "Financial innovation and endogenous growth," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 1-24.
    17. Peter T. Gianiodis & Matthias Thürer, 2018. "The Impact Of Government Intervention On Technological Regimes: The Sourcing Of Financial Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(03), pages 1-28, April.
    18. Fricke, Daniel & Gerig, Austin, 2014. "Liquidity Risk, Speculative Trade, and the Optimal Latency of Financial Markets," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100402, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    19. Nizar, Muhammad Afdi, 2019. "Baik-Buruk Inovasi Keuangan [Financial Innovation : The Good and the Bad Sides]," MPRA Paper 97921, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Tamer Khraisha & Keren Arthur, 2018. "Can we have a general theory of financial innovation processes? A conceptual review," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 4(1), pages 1-27, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedgfe:2025-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ryan Wolfslayer ; Keisha Fournillier (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.