IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Chasing the dragon: Accounting for the under-performance of India by comparison with China in attracting foreign direct investment

  • John S Henley

    ()

Registered author(s):

    This paper compares and contrasts the performance of India and China in attracting foreign direct investment (FDI). Both economies are large emerging markets that had rather similar profiles in 1978. Today, China ranks number one as the world’s preferred foreign investment destination. Closer examination of the FDI statistics suggests that India’s performance has been significantly understated while China’s performance continues to be overstated. However India still lags for a number of reasons. These include a high tariff regime, poor infrastructure (power, ports, roads and railways), a regulatory system that is too often not business-friendly, a policy of reservation of many potentially export-oriented sectors for small businesses and inflexible labour laws. The government’s large budget deficit is preventing investment in necessary physical infrastructure yet India needs to increase the rate of private investment to enhance the economic growth rate and reduce poverty. The paper concludes that based on China’s experience of promoting FDI, further economic devolution to state level is the best way forward. While this is likely to exacerbate inter-state income inequality in the short term, it does offer the possibility of redistribution in the longer term. [DSA, Annual conference 2003: Globalisation and Development]

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=Document122122006140.806225.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=756&fref=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by eSocialSciences in its series Working Papers with number id:756.

    as
    in new window

    Length:
    Date of creation: Dec 2006
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:756
    Note: Institutional Papers
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.esocialsciences.org

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Bulent Unel, 2003. "Productivity Trends in India's Manufacturing Sectors in the Last Two Decades," IMF Working Papers 03/22, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Tarun Khanna & Krishna Palepu, 2000. "Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An Analysis of Diversified Indian Business Groups," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(2), pages 867-891, 04.
    3. Albuquerque, Rui & Loayza, Norman & Serven, Luis, 2005. "World market integration through the lens of foreign direct investors," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 267-295, July.
    4. Elena Ianchovichina & Terrie Walmsley, 2005. "Impact of China's WTO Accession on East Asia," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 23(2), pages 261-277, 04.
    5. Prathivadi Bhayankaram Anand, 1999. "India’s economic policy reforms: a review," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 26(3), pages 241-257, September.
    6. Edward M. Graham & Erika Wada, 2001. "Foreign Direct Investment in China: Effects on Growth and Economic Performance," Working Paper Series WP01-3, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    7. Shatz, Howard J. & Venables, Anthony J., 2000. "The geography of international investment," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2338, The World Bank.
    8. Harm Zebregs & Wanda Tseng, 2002. "Foreign Direct Investment in China; Some Lessons for Other Countries," IMF Policy Discussion Papers 02/3, International Monetary Fund.
    9. Hallward-Driemeier, Mary & Wallsten, Scott & Lixin Colin Xu, 2003. "The investment climate and the firm : firm-level evidence from China," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3003, The World Bank.
    10. Helm, Dieter, 2001. "Royal Bank of Scotland/Scottish Economic Society Seventh Annual Lecture: Making Britain More Competitive: A Critique of Regulation and Competition Policy," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 48(5), pages 471-87, November.
    11. A. Thillai Rajan, 2002. "Restructuring State Owned Power Utilities: Qualitative Observations from an Indian Experience," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 3(1), pages 77-96, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Padma Prakash)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.