IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id12033.html

Indian Food and Welfare Schemes: Scope for Digitization Towards Cash Transfers

Author

Listed:
  • Shweta Saini

  • Sameedh Sharma

  • Ashok Gulati
  • Siraj Hussain

  • Joachim von Braun

Abstract

The paper presents a case for a phased rolling out of direct benefits transfer (DBT) for Food in India. By studying all states and Union Territories on three broad parameters: demographics, performance of the existing Public Distribution System (PDS), and current state of banking infrastructure, the paper evaluates their “readiness†for shifting away from the existing physical grain distribution system under PDS to the ICT based DBT where a food subsidy amount (in lieu of PDS grain entitlement) is directly transferred into the Aadhaar-linked bank account of identified beneficiaries. The analysis reveals that all 36 states can implement DBT-food in the next five years i.e. by the year 2022 and this should happen in four phases. The states that are urban, have sufficient open market grain availability, are financially inclusive, and have lesser percentage of poor and malnourished may make the shift almost immediately. For rest, an interim phase of a reformed and IT based PDS system with identity verification of beneficiaries is built-in. In order to make the transition to DBT feasible and successful, the paper recommends improvements and investments by states/UTs into ensuring adequate food grains in the open markets, inclusive banking infrastructure and diverse payment channels, sufficiency of the food subsidy amount and display of leadership and political will to reform the PDS through DBT. This paper argues that DBT has a potential to make way for a system of social security or universal basic income, where every citizen receives income support – the size of which can be adjusted based on his/her needs and vulnerability.

Suggested Citation

  • Shweta Saini & Sameedh Sharma & Ashok Gulati & Siraj Hussain & Joachim von Braun, 2017. "Indian Food and Welfare Schemes: Scope for Digitization Towards Cash Transfers," Working Papers id:12033, eSocialSciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:12033
    Note: Institutional Papers
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=A2017821143853_29.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=12033&fref=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wbk:wbpubs:14902 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jesse M Cunha & Giacomo De Giorgi & Seema Jayachandran, 2019. "The Price Effects of Cash Versus In-Kind Transfers," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(1), pages 240-281.
    3. Seth R. Gitter & James Manley & Vanya Slavchevska, 2010. "How Effective are Cash Transfer Programs at Improving Nutritional Status?," Working Papers 2010-18, Towson University, Department of Economics, revised Dec 2012.
    4. Marta Kozicka & Dr Matthias Kalkuhl & Jan Brockhaus, 2015. "Food Grain Policies in India and Their Implications for Stocks and Fiscal Costs: A Partial Equilibrium Analysis," EcoMod2015 8377, EcoMod.
    5. Ashok Gulati & Shweta Saini, 2021. "Way Forward," India Studies in Business and Economics, in: Ashok Gulati & Ranjana Roy & Shweta Saini (ed.), Revitalizing Indian Agriculture and Boosting Farmer Incomes, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 353-363, Springer.
    6. Khera, Reetika, 2014. "Cash vs. in-kind transfers: Indian data meets theory," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 116-128.
    7. Johannes Haushofer & Jeremy Shapiro, 2016. "The Short-term Impact of Unconditional Cash Transfers to the Poor: ExperimentalEvidence from Kenya," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 131(4), pages 1973-2042.
    8. repec:wbk:wbpubs:22101 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Ingrid Woolard & Murray Leibbrandt, 2010. "The Evolution and Impact of Unconditional Cash Transfers in South Africa," SALDRU Working Papers 51, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.
    10. Paul Glewwe & Ana Lúcia Kassouf, 2010. "What Is the Impact of the Bolsa Família Programme on Education?," One Pager 107, International Policy Centre.
    11. repec:wbk:wbpubs:6582 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marta Kozicka & Regine Weber & Matthias Kalkuhl, 2019. "Cash vs. in-kind transfers: the role of self-targeting in reforming the Indian food subsidy program," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(4), pages 915-927, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lehmann, M. Christian & Matarazzo, Hellen, 2019. "Voters’ response to in-kind transfers: Quasi-experimental evidence from prescription drug cost-sharing in Brazil," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Brockhaus, Jan & Kalkuhl, Matthias & Kozicka, Marta, "undated". "What Drives India’s Rice Stocks? Empirical Evidence," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235659, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Lucie Gadenne & Samuel Norris & Monica Singhal & Sandip Sukhtankar, 2024. "In-Kind Transfers as Insurance," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(9), pages 2861-2897, September.
    4. Abhijit Banerjee, 2016. "Policies for a better-fed world," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 152(1), pages 3-17, February.
    5. Marta Kozicka & Regine Weber & Matthias Kalkuhl, 2019. "Cash vs. in-kind transfers: the role of self-targeting in reforming the Indian food subsidy program," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(4), pages 915-927, August.
    6. Federico Tagliati, 2019. "Child labor under cash and in-kind transfers: evidence from rural Mexico," Working Papers 1935, Banco de España.
    7. Kurdi, Sikandra, 2021. "The nutritional benefits of cash transfers in humanitarian crises: evidence from Yemen," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    8. Biyase, Mduduzi, 2018. "Assessing the impact of social grants on household welfare using morning after simulation and PSM approach," MPRA Paper 84477, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Abay, Kibrom A. & Abdelfattah, Lina Alaaeldin & Abushama, Hala & Kirui, Oliver K. & Nigus, Halefom Yigzaw & Siddig, Khalid, 2025. "Can digital cash transfers serve those in active conflict? Evidence from a randomized intervention in Sudan," IFPRI discussion papers 2374, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Miller, Stephen M. & Neanidis, Kyriakos C., 2015. "Demographic transition and economic welfare: The role of in-cash and in-kind transfers," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 84-92.
    11. McIntosh, Craig & Zeitlin, Andrew, 2022. "Using household grants to benchmark the cost effectiveness of a USAID workforce readiness program," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    12. Casaburi, Lorenzo & Reed, Tristan, 2017. "Competition in Agricultural Markets: An Experimental Approach," CEPR Discussion Papers 11985, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    13. Klaus Abbink & Gaurav Datt & Lata Gangadharan & Digvijay Negi & Bharat Ramaswami, 2024. "Deadweight Losses or Gains from In-kind Transfers: Experimental Evidence," Working Papers 110, Ashoka University, Department of Economics.
    14. Handa, Sudhanshu & Natali, Luisa & Seidenfeld, David & Tembo, Gelson & Davis, Benjamin, 2018. "Can unconditional cash transfers raise long-term living standards? Evidence from Zambia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 42-65.
    15. Senay Sokullu & Christine Valente, 2022. "Individual consumption in collective households: Identification using repeated observations with an application to PROGRESA," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), pages 286-304, March.
    16. Tagliati, Federico, 2022. "Welfare effects of an in-kind transfer program: Evidence from Mexico," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. Masiero, Silvia, 2016. "Digital governance and the reconstruction of the Indian anti-poverty system," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68483, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Nicholas Li & Angela Daley & Barry Watson, 2025. "Give and take? Child benefits and prices in Northern Canada," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(3), pages 831-859, August.
    19. Alderman, Harold, 2014. "Can transfer programs be made more nutrition sensitive?," IFPRI discussion papers 1342, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    20. Pople, Ashley Charlotte & Premand, Patrick & Dercon,Stefan & Vinez, Margaux & Brunelin, Stephanie, 2025. "The Earlier the Better? Cash Transfers for Drought Response in Niger," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11138, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:12033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.