Policy Efforts for the Development of Storage Technologies in the U.S. and Germany
Recent developments in electricity markets such as the increased deployment of variable renewable generation have prompted renewed interest over the role of energy storage. While storage technologies can in principle provide various benefits for the functioning of an electrical grid, many energy storage technologies are in initial stages of development and demonstration. The role of public policy is thus vital for development and market integration of storage technology. We identify and discuss selected policy efforts by the United States of America and Germany with a focus on less-developed storage technologies. While research and demonstration of storage technologies has increased in both countries, we find that public funding is still small compared to overall energyrelated expenditures. Both countries use technology-push and market-pull approaches. Whereas the U.S. focuses on technologies which are useful to improve system stability, like batteries, capacitors, and flywheels, Germany has a stronger focus on bulk seasonal storage that may aid the integration of variable renewables, for example power to gas. We conclude that increased data-sharing and cooperation between the two governments and research institutions will help enhance the efficacy of both countries' publicly funded storage research. U.S. research institutions that link basic research with commercialization of technology, as well as developments in U.S. regulation of ancillary markets, may provide useful models for Germany. The U.S., on the other hand, may look to Germany's institutions as inspiration for its loan guarantee program.
|Date of creation:||2013|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Mohrenstraße 58, D-10117 Berlin|
Web page: http://www.diw.de/en
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Daron Acemoglu & Ufuk Akcigit & Douglas Hanley & William Kerr, 2016.
"Transition to Clean Technology,"
Journal of Political Economy,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(1), pages 52-104.
- Daron Acemoglu & Ufuk Akcigit & Douglas Hanley & William Kerr, 2014. "Transition to Clean Technology," NBER Working Papers 20743, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Daron Acemoglu & Ufuk Akcigit & Douglas Hanley & William R. Kerr, 2014. "Transition to Clean Technology," Harvard Business School Working Papers 15-045, Harvard Business School.
- Acemoglu, Daron & Akcigit, Ufuk & Hanley, Douglas & Kerr, William R., 2015. "Transition to clean technology," Research Discussion Papers 26/2015, Bank of Finland.
- Daron Acemoglu & Ufuk Akcigit & Douglas Hanley & William Kerr, 2014. "Transition to Clean Technology," PIER Working Paper Archive 14-044, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
- Richard R. Nelson, 1959. "The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 67, pages 297-297.
- Di Stefano, Giada & Gambardella, Alfonso & Verona, Gianmario, 2012. "Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1283-1295.
- Felix Groba & Barbara Breitschopf, 2013. "Impact of Renewable Energy Policy and Use on Innovation: A Literature Review," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1318, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
- Scherer, F M, 1982. "Demand-Pull and Technological Invention: Schmookler Revisited," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 225-237, March.
- Yokell, Michael D, 1979. "The Role of the Government in Subsidizing Solar Energy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(2), pages 357-361, May. Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)