IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/deg/conpap/c016_040.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Vulnerable Markets

Author

Listed:
  • David Mayer-Foulkes

Abstract

A production market with given preferences, technology and competition technology is vulnerable if it admits both perfect competition and monopoly or oligopoly. Under decreasing returns, the combination of sunk costs and a potential for monopoly profits can be sufficient basis for vulnerability, allowing a large agent to establish monopoly by installing enough productive capacity. The monopolist deters entry by threatening to oversupply the market. The threat is credible if the future discount rate is low enough and if reputation dynamics do not invite a slow loss of market power. Vulnerable markets allow financial institutions to concentrate ownership for profit.

Suggested Citation

  • David Mayer-Foulkes, 2011. "Vulnerable Markets," DEGIT Conference Papers c016_040, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
  • Handle: RePEc:deg:conpap:c016_040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://degit.sam.sdu.dk/papers/degit_16/c016_040.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pot, E.A. & Peeters, R.J.A.P. & Peters, H.J.M. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2010. "Intentional price wars on the equilibrium path," Research Memorandum 028, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    2. Busetto, Francesca & Codognato, Giulio & Ghosal, Sayantan, 2008. "Cournot-Walras Equilibrium as a Subgame Perfect Equilibrium," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 837, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    3. Levenstein, Margaret C, 1997. "Price Wars and the Stability of Collusion: A Study of the Pre-World War I Bromine Industry," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 117-137, June.
    4. Drew Fudenberg & Jean Tirole, 1986. "A "Signal-Jamming" Theory of Predation," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 17(3), pages 366-376, Autumn.
    5. Codognato, Giulio, 1995. "Cournot-Walras and Cournot Equilibria in Mixed Markets: A Comparison," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 5(2), pages 361-370, March.
    6. Busetto, Francesca & Codognato, Giulio & Ghosal, Sayantan, 2011. "Noncooperative oligopoly in markets with a continuum of traders," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 38-45, May.
    7. Sahi, Siddhartha & Yao, Shuntian, 1989. "The non-cooperative equilibria of a trading economy with complete markets and consistent prices," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 325-346, September.
    8. Okuno, Masahiro & Postlewaite, Andrew & Roberts, John, 1980. "Oligopoly and Competition in Large Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(1), pages 22-31, March.
    9. Roth, David, 1996. "Rationalizable Predatory Pricing," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 380-396, February.
    10. Shitovitz, Benyamin, 1973. "Oligopoly in Markets with a Continuum of Traders," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 41(3), pages 467-501, May.
    11. repec:hhs:iuiwop:516 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Osterdal, Lars Peter, 2003. "A note on the stability of collusion in differentiated oligopolies," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 53-64, March.
    13. CODOGNATO, Giulio & GHOSAL, Sayantan, 1994. "Cournot Equilibria in Markets with a Continuum of Traders," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 1994059, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alex Dickson & Simone Tonin, 2021. "An introduction to perfect and imperfect competition via bilateral oligopoly," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 103-128, July.
    2. Busetto, Francesca & Codognato, Giulio & Ghosal, Sayantan, 2011. "Noncooperative oligopoly in markets with a continuum of traders," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 38-45, May.
    3. Francesca Busetto & Giulio Codognato & Sayantan Ghosal, "undated". "Noncooperative oligopoly in markets with a continuum of traders: a limit theorem a la Cournot," Working Papers 2014_01, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    4. Busetto, Francesca & Codognato, Giulio & Ghosal, Sayantan, 2014. "Noncooperative Oligopoly in Markets with a Continuum of Traders: A Limit Theorem µa la Cournot," SIRE Discussion Papers 2014-019, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    5. Julien, Ludovic A., 2013. "On Stackelberg competition in strategic multilateral exchange," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 59-75.
    6. Busetto, Francesca & Codognato, Giulio & Julien, Ludovic, 2020. "Atomic Leontievian Cournotian traders are always Walrasian," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 318-327.
    7. Francesca Busetto & Giulio Codognato & Sayantan Ghosal, 2012. "Noncooperative Oligopoly in Markets with a Continuum of Traders: A Limit Theorem," EconomiX Working Papers 2012-49, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    8. Francesca Busetto & Giulio Codognato & Sayantan Ghosal, 2017. "Asymptotic equivalence between Cournot–Nash and Walras equilibria in exchange economies with atoms and an atomless part," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(4), pages 975-990, November.
    9. Codognato, Giulio & Ghosal, Sayantan & Tonin, Simone, 2015. "Atomic Cournotian traders may be Walrasian," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 159(PA), pages 1-14.
    10. Busetto, Francesca & Codognato, Giulio & Ghosal, Syantan, 2008. "Cournot-Walras Equilibrium as a Subgame Perfect Equilibrium," Economic Research Papers 269786, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    11. Francesca Busetto & Giulio Codognato & Sayantan Ghosal & Ludovic Julien & Simone Tonin, 2020. "Existence and optimality of Cournot–Nash equilibria in a bilateral oligopoly with atoms and an atomless part," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 49(4), pages 933-951, December.
    12. Busetto, Francesca & Codognato, Giulio & Ghosal, Sayantan & Julien, Ludovic & Tonin, Simone, 2018. "Noncooperative oligopoly in markets with a continuum of traders and a strongly connected set of commodities," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 478-485.
    13. Francesca Busetto & Giulio Codognato & Sayantan Ghosal & Ludovic Julien & Simone Tonin, 0. "Existence and optimality of Cournot–Nash equilibria in a bilateral oligopoly with atoms and an atomless part," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    14. Jonathan H. Hamilton & W. Bentley MacLeod & Jacques-François Thisse, 1991. "Spatial Competition and the Core," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 106(3), pages 925-937.
    15. Tasnadi, Attila, 2000. "A price-setting game with a nonatomic fringe," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 63-69, October.
    16. Bloch, Francis & Ghosal, Sayantan, 1997. "Stable Trading Structures in Bilateral Oligopolies," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 368-384, June.
    17. Julien, Ludovic A., 2011. "Unemployment equilibrium and economic policy in mixed markets," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 1931-1940, July.
    18. Bajo-Buenestado, Raúl, 2017. "Welfare implications of capacity payments in a price-capped electricity sector: A case study of the Texas market (ERCOT)," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 272-285.
    19. Argenton, C., 2010. "Predation Under Perfect Information," Other publications TiSEM c64644e5-2aae-4e41-9a47-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Alex Dickson & Roger Hartley, 2013. "Bilateral oligopoly and quantity competition," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 52(3), pages 979-1004, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:deg:conpap:c016_040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iehhsdk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jan Pedersen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iehhsdk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.