Bargaining for bribes under uncertainty
A corrupt transaction is often the result of bargaining between the parties involved. This paper models bribery as a double auction where a private citizen and a public o¢ cial strategically interact as the po- tential buyer and the potential seller of a corrupt service. Individu- als di¤er in the internalized moral cost generated by corruption, and may have only imperfect information on others.moral cost, i.e. their .corruptibility.. This paper investigates the role that imperfect infor- mation with respect to the .corruptibility.of one.s potential partner in corruption plays in his or her propensity to engage in bribery, and, consequently, the equilibrium level of corruption in a society. We .nd that corruption is lower when potential bribers and potential bribees are uncertain regarding each other.s .corruptibility.. This paper pro- vides therefore theoretical support to anti-corruption strategies, such as sta¤ rotation in public o¢ ces, aimed at decreasing the social close- ness of bribers and bribees.
|Date of creation:||2008|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: +44-(0)1865 271084
Fax: +44-(0)1865 281447
Web page: http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Andvig, Jens Chr. & Moene, Karl Ove, 1990.
"How corruption may corrupt,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,
Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 63-76, January.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:csa:wpaper:2008-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Richard Payne)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.