IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpm/cepmap/9517.html

Contemporary transformations of the japanese wage labor nexus in historical retrospect and some international comparisons

Author

Listed:
  • Boyer, Robert

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Boyer, Robert, 1995. "Contemporary transformations of the japanese wage labor nexus in historical retrospect and some international comparisons," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) 9517, CEPREMAP.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpm:cepmap:9517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cepremap.fr/depot/couv_orange/co9517.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wolcott, Susan, 1994. "The Perils of Lifetime Employment Systems: Productivity Advance in the Indian and Japanese Textile Industries, 1920–1938," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(2), pages 307-324, June.
    2. Hashimoto, Masanori & Raisian, John, 1989. "Investments in employer-employee attachments by Japanese and U.S. workers in firms of varying size," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 31-48, March.
    3. Robert Boyer & André Orléan, 1991. "Les transformations des conventions salariales entre théorie et histoire : d'Henry Ford au fordisme," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 42(2), pages 233-272.
    4. Tuvia Blumenthal, 1993. "Labor Adjustment Policy in Japan," Discussion Paper Series a285, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    5. Tsuyoshi Tsuru & James B. Rebitzer, 1995. "The Limits of Enterprise Unionism: Prospects for Continuing Union Decline in Japan," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 459-492, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boyer, Robert, 1996. "Seven paradoxes of capitalism...or is a theory of modern economies still possible ?," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) 9620, CEPREMAP.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oro, Oro Ufuo & Alagidede, Paul, 2018. "The Nature of the finance–growth relationship: Evidence from a panel of oil-producing countries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 89-102.
    2. Marc Amblard, 2000. "La Theorie Des Conventions : Une Approche Renouvelee Du Modele Comptable ?," Post-Print halshs-00587419, HAL.
    3. Klaus Desmet & Stephen Parente, 2014. "Resistance to Technology Adoption: The Rise and Decline of Guilds," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 17(3), pages 437-458, July.
    4. Bishnupriya Gupta, 2011. "Wages, unions, and labour productivity: evidence from Indian cotton mills," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 64(s1), pages 76-98, February.
    5. Kyota Eguchi, 2000. "Unions, Job Security, and Incentives of Workers," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-91, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    6. Canton, Erik J. F. & de Groot, Henri L. F. & Nahuis, Richard, 2002. "Vested interests, population ageing and technology adoption," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 631-652, November.
    7. Stanislas Kihm, 2023. "How did Saint-Gobain's European deindustrialisation finance the group's global industrial ambitions (1978-1991)? [Comment la désindustrialisation européenne de Saint-Gobain a-t-elle financé les ambitions industrielles mondiales du groupe (1978-199," Post-Print hal-04136468, HAL.
    8. Bernard Baudry, 1992. "Contrat, autorité et confiance. La relation de sous-traitance est-elle assimilable à la relation d'emploi ?," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 43(5), pages 871-894.
    9. Jerzmanowski, Michal, 2007. "Total factor productivity differences: Appropriate technology vs. efficiency," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 2080-2110, November.
    10. Alex Bryson & Ryo Kambayashi & Susumu Kuwahara & Akie Nakamura & Jacques Wels, 2025. "What is Happening to Unionization in Japan?," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 2529, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).
    11. Robert Boyer, 1995. "The Future of Unions: Is the Anglo-Saxon Model a Fatality, or Will Contrasting National Trajectories Persist?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 545-556, December.
    12. Ashvin Ahuja & Thammarak Moenjak, 2002. "Economic Arrangements and Long-Term Growth in Thailand," Working Papers 2002-05, Monetary Policy Group, Bank of Thailand.
    13. Roy, Tirthankar, 2021. "Useful & reliable: technological transformation in colonial India," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113442, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Yonekura, Akira & Gallhofer, Sonja & Haslam, Jim, 2012. "Accounting disclosure, corporate governance and the battle for markets: The case of trade negotiations between Japan and the U.S," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 312-331.
    15. Masanori Hashimoto, 1994. "Employment-Based Training in Japanese Firms in Japan and in the United States: Experiences of Automobile Manufacturers," NBER Chapters, in: Training and the Private Sector: International Comparisons, pages 109-148, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Andrew Clark, 1995. "L'utilité est-elle relative ? Analyse à l'aide de données sur les ménages," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 121(5), pages 151-164.
    17. Sandrine DARAUT (GRES-LEREPS), 2003. "The Organizational Information System (OIS), object and medium of learning (In French)," Cahiers du GRES (2002-2009) 2003-01, Groupement de Recherches Economiques et Sociales.
    18. Jooyeon Jeong, 2010. "Can Unions Grow in Undemocratic Political and Social Environments? The Korean Case from a Comparative Perspective," Discussion Paper Series 1012, Institute of Economic Research, Korea University.
    19. Eguchi, Kyota, 2002. "Unions as commitment devices," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 407-421, April.
    20. Alejandro Ayuso‐Díaz & Antonio Tena‐Junguito, 2020. "Trade in the shadow of power: Japanese industrial exports in the interwar years," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 73(3), pages 815-843, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpm:cepmap:9517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sébastien Villemot (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceprefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.