IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_12471.html

Good Intentions, Informal Outcomes: The Formalization Trap in Global E-Waste Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Coria

Abstract

Large volumes of e-waste collected under formal schemes in high-income countries are still processed informally in developing ones, despite continuous policy efforts to reverse this trend. This paper shows that the persistence of informal e-waste processing is a consequence of how global waste flows interact with domestic market structure. I develop a two-country model in which a cost-minimizing broker exports low-value fractions of e-waste to a poorer country, where informal dismantlers and licensed recyclers compete to purchase material from local collectors. Because formal facilities incur fixed-capacity costs, their competitiveness depends on achieving sufficiently high-value throughput. Low-value exports from the rich country increase total inflows but depress the effective high-value throughput and dilute domestic subsidies, keeping average costs high and allowing informal dismantlers to outbid formal recyclers. The model generates a formalization trap with multiple equilibria and explains why widely used policies, including per-unit subsidies, capital support, higher recycling targets in rich countries, and integration of informal collectors into formal systems, often fail to trigger a transition toward formal treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Coria, 2026. "Good Intentions, Informal Outcomes: The Formalization Trap in Global E-Waste Markets," CESifo Working Paper Series 12471, CESifo.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12471.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O17 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
    • O19 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations
    • F18 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Environment
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.