IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_11968.html

Limited Self-Knowledge and Survey Response Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Armin Falk
  • Luca Henkel
  • Thomas Neuber
  • Philipp Strack

Abstract

We study response behavior in surveys and propose a method to identify and improve the informativeness of survey evidence. First, we develop a choice model of survey response behavior under the assumption that responses imperfectly reveal respondents' characteristics due to limited self-knowledge, inattention, or lack of engagement. Respondents receive individual-specific signals about their characteristics and choose their responses accordingly. We identify the conditions under which this process leads to biased inference from survey evidence and demonstrate how focusing on respondents with high signal precision mitigates bias. Importantly, we show that a respondent's signal precision can be inferred from observed response patterns. Second, based on these insights, we develop a consistent and unbiased estimator for a respondent's signal precision. Third, we provide experimental and survey evidence concerning the performance of the model and estimator. We experimentally test the model's key predictions in a context where the researcher knows the true characteristics. The data confirm both the model's predictions and the estimator's validity. Using a large survey, we show how our estimator can be used to improve survey evidence. Our estimator significantly increases the explanatory power of self-assessments and their association with behavior, and performs well relative to alternative methods proposed in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Armin Falk & Luca Henkel & Thomas Neuber & Philipp Strack, 2025. "Limited Self-Knowledge and Survey Response Behavior," CESifo Working Paper Series 11968, CESifo.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_11968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp11968.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A. Ballester, 2023. "The rationalizability of survey responses," Economics Working Papers 1863, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    3. Mikhalishchev, Sergei, 2023. "Optimal menu when agents make mistakes," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 25-33.
    4. Michelle Acampora & Francesco Capozza & Vahid Moghani, 2022. "Mental Health Literacy, Beliefs and Demand for Mental Health Support among University Students," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 22-079/I, Tinbergen Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_11968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.