IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/cepdps/dp2176.html

From pilot to policy: experimental evidence from Scaling online tutoring

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Calle
  • Lucas Gortazar
  • Maria Hernandez-de-Benito
  • Claudia Hupkau
  • Teresa Molina-Millan
  • Antonio Roldan Mones

Abstract

Can effective tutoring programs survive the transition from pilot to scale, and from researcher to government implementers? We address this question using a randomized controlled trial of an online mathematics tutoring program scaled from a successful pilot and implemented entirely by regional education authorities in Spain. Critically, tutoring was delivered by interim public-school teachers-qualified educators already integrated into the government's teacher registry-rather than specially recruited tutors, offering a test of whether effects persist under a lower-cost, readily scalable staffing model. Assignment to tutoring increased end-of-year grades by 0.15σ and standardized math test scores by 0.11σ - approximately one-third of the original pilot effects. Treated students also reported improved confidence in their math abilities and reduced math anxiety. An experimental socio-emotional training module for tutors improved affective outcomes but did not enhance academic gains. The findings demonstrate that online tutoring can generate meaningful benefits at scale under government implementation, while providing realistic benchmarks for the "voltage drop" policymakers should anticipate when adopting evidence-based interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Calle & Lucas Gortazar & Maria Hernandez-de-Benito & Claudia Hupkau & Teresa Molina-Millan & Antonio Roldan Mones, 2026. "From pilot to policy: experimental evidence from Scaling online tutoring," CEP Discussion Papers dp2176, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp2176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp2176.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp2176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/discussion-papers/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.