IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt11q0s48s.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Non-normality of Data in Structural Equation Models

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Shengyi
  • Mokhtarian, Patricia L
  • Johnston, Robert A.

Abstract

Using census block groups data on socio-demographics, land use, and travel behavior, we test the cutoffs suggested in the literature for trustworthy estimates and hypothesis testing statistics, and evaluate the efficacy of deleting observations as an approach to improving multivariate normality, in structural equation modeling. The results show that the measures of univariate and multivariate non-normalities will fall into the acceptable ranges for trustworthy maximum likelihood estimation after a few true outliers are deleted. We argue that pursuing a multivariate normal distribution by deleting observations should be balanced against loss of model power in the interpretation of the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Shengyi & Mokhtarian, Patricia L & Johnston, Robert A., 2008. "Non-normality of Data in Structural Equation Models," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt11q0s48s, University of California Transportation Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt11q0s48s
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/11q0s48s.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tor Andreassen & Bengt Lorentzen & Ulf Olsson, 2006. "The Impact of Non-Normality and Estimation Methods in SEM on Satisfaction Research in Marketing," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 39-58, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ramona Bunkus & Ilkhom Soliev & Insa Theesfeld, 2020. "Density of resident farmers and rural inhabitants’ relationship to agriculture: operationalizing complex social interactions with a structural equation model," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(1), pages 47-63, March.
    2. Lättman, Katrin & Olsson, Lars E. & Friman, Margareta, 2016. "Development and test of the Perceived Accessibility Scale (PAC) in public transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 257-263.
    3. G. Rejikumar & Aswathy Asokan-Ajitha & Sofi Dinesh & Ajay Jose, 2022. "The role of cognitive complexity and risk aversion in online herd behavior," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 585-621, June.
    4. Samuel Adiprasetya Isaputra & Sumaryono, 2023. "P2P lending: Moderation of desirability of control on risk-taking decisions of Indonesian borrowers," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-7, December.
    5. Sahi, Gurjeet Kaur & Gupta, Mahesh C. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2020. "The effects of strategic orientation on operational ambidexterity: A study of indian SMEs in the industry 4.0 era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    6. Shanmugavel, Nagarajan & Balakrishnan, Janarthanan, 2023. "Influence of pro-environmental behaviour towards behavioural intention of electric vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Yuejun Lawrance Cai, 2023. "Strengthening perceptions of virtual team cohesiveness and effectiveness in new normal: A hyperpersonal communication theory perspective," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 1649-1682, September.
    8. Farida Saleem & Yingying Zhang-Zhang & Muhammad Imran Malik & Alawiya Allui, 2020. "Revisiting Stakeholder Theory and Environmentalism: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Yunxia Liu & Xunpeng Shi & Ya Ping Wang & Tao Sun, 2019. "Promoting Green Residential Buildings in China: Bridging the Gap between Design and Operation to Improve Occupants’ Residential Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Jonas De Vos & Long Cheng & Frank Witlox, 2021. "Do changes in the residential location lead to changes in travel attitudes? A structural equation modeling approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 2011-2034, August.
    11. Akriti Gupta & Aman Chadha & Vijayshri Tiwari & Arup Varma & Vijay Pereira, 2023. "Sustainable training practices: predicting job satisfaction and employee behavior using machine learning techniques," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 1913-1936, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Lu-Yao & Hu, Hai-Hua & Wang, Le & Qin, Jian-Qun, 2022. "Privacy assurances and social sharing in social commerce: The mediating role of threat-coping appraisals," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Shengyi Gao & Patricia Mokhtarian & Robert Johnston, 2008. "Exploring the connections among job accessibility, employment, income, and auto ownership using structural equation modeling," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 42(2), pages 341-356, June.
    3. Foss, Tron & Jöreskog, Karl G. & Olsson, Ulf H., 2011. "Testing structural equation models: The effect of kurtosis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 2263-2275, July.
    4. Gao, Shengyi & Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & Johnston, Robert A., 2008. "Non-normality of Data in Structural Equation Models," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7nf8f0v7, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. David Ory & Patricia Mokhtarian, 2010. "The impact of non-normality, sample size and estimation technique on goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation modeling: evidence from ten empirical models of travel behavior," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 427-445, April.
    6. Kovačić Nataša & Topolšek Darja & Dragan Dejan, 2015. "Tourism sector, Travel agencies, and Transport Suppliers: Comparison of Different Estimators in the Structural Equation Modeling," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 11-24, November.
    7. Ory, David T, 2007. "Structural Equation Modeling of Relative Desired Travel Amounts," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8mj659fp, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    8. James C. Ryan & Syed A. A. Tipu, 2016. "An Empirical Alternative to Sidani and Thornberry’s (2009) ‘Current Arab Work Ethic’: Examining the Multidimensional Work Ethic Profile in an Arab Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 177-198, April.
    9. Ory, David Terrance, 2007. "Structural Equation Modeling of Relative Desired Travel Amounts," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7rb3x52m, University of California Transportation Center.
    10. Muhammad Farhan Jalil & Wasim Ullah & Zeeshan Ahmed, 2021. "Training Perception and Innovative Behavior of SME Employees: Examining the Mediating Effects of Firm Commitment," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    11. Alejandra Caqueo-Urízar & Diego Atencio & Alfonso Urzúa & Jerome Flores, 2022. "Integration, Social Competence and Life Satisfaction: the Mediating Effect of Resilience and Self-Esteem in Adolescents," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(2), pages 617-629, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt11q0s48s. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.