IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/ucscec/qt8sv3q6qv.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Products and Prejudice: Measuring Country-of-Origin Bias in U.S. Wine Imports

Author

Listed:
  • Brooks, Eileen

Abstract

Should exporters worry about country-of-origin bias? Although the pervasiveness of country-level product advertising suggests that they do, lack of data has limited the empirical study of subjective bias toward products from a specific country. Using data from the U.S. wine industry, including numerical blind tasting evaluations, this paper directly computes the impact of country-of-origin bias upon wine import prices. A hedonic pricing framework is used to control for vintage, blind-tasted quality, varietals, production costs and quantities. Cross-country comparisons of price residuals suggest that "Product of Italy" on the label can raise the price of a bottle by more than fifty percent.

Suggested Citation

  • Brooks, Eileen, 2003. "Products and Prejudice: Measuring Country-of-Origin Bias in U.S. Wine Imports," Santa Cruz Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt8sv3q6qv, Department of Economics, UC Santa Cruz.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:ucscec:qt8sv3q6qv
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8sv3q6qv.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Head, Keith & Mayer, Thierry & Ries, John, 2002. "On the Pervasiveness of Home Market Effects," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 69(275), pages 371-390, August.
    2. Davis, Donald R, 1998. "The Home Market, Trade, and Industrial Structure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 88(5), pages 1264-1276, December.
    3. Holger C. Wolf, 2000. "Intranational Home Bias In Trade," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 82(4), pages 555-563, November.
    4. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/c8dmi8nm4pdjkuc9g8o4o0m0g is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Robert C. Feenstra & James R. Markusen & Andrew K. Rose, 2001. "Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 34(2), pages 430-447, May.
    6. R.P. Byron & O. Ashenfelter, 1995. "Predicting the Quality of an Unborn Grange," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 71(1), pages 40-53, March.
    7. Keith Head & Thierry Mayer & John Ries, 2000. "On the Pervasiveness of Home Market Effects," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 0862, Econometric Society.
    8. Keith Head & John Ries, 2001. "Increasing Returns versus National Product Differentiation as an Explanation for the Pattern of U.S.-Canada Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(4), pages 858-876, September.
    9. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/c8dmi8nm4pdjkuc9g8o4o0m0g is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Byron, R P & Ashenfelter, Orley, 1995. "Predicting the Quality of an Unborn Grange," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 71(212), pages 40-53, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saens, Rodrigo & Berríos, Rodrigo, 2012. "The country brand trap," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    2. Filippis, Fabrizio De & Giua, Mara & Salvatici, Luca & Vaquero-Pineiro, Cristina, 2021. "The International Competitiveness of Geographical Indications: Hype or Hope?," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315147, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Morrison, Andrea & Rabellotti, Roberta, 2017. "Gradual catch up and enduring leadership in the global wine industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 417-430.
    4. De Filippis, Fabrizio & Giua, Mara & Salvatici, Luca & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "The international trade impacts of Geographical Indications: Hype or hope?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brooks, Eileen, 2003. "Products and Prejudice: Measuring Country-of-Origin Bias in U.S. Wine Imports," Santa Cruz Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt59m9341j, Department of Economics, UC Santa Cruz.
    2. Brooks, Eileen, 2003. "Products and Prejudice: Measuring Country-of-Origin Bias in U.S. Wine Imports," Santa Cruz Center for International Economics, Working Paper Series qt8sv3q6qv, Center for International Economics, UC Santa Cruz.
    3. Mario Larch, 2007. "The Home Market Effect in Models with Multinational Enterprises," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 62-74, February.
    4. Brülhart, Marius & Trionfetti, Federico, 2009. "A test of trade theories when expenditure is home biased," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 830-845, October.
    5. Deng-Shing Huang & Yo-Yi Huang & Cheng-Te Lee, 2006. "Technology Advantage and Trade: Home Market Effects Revisited," IEAS Working Paper : academic research 06-A011, Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
    6. Head, Keith & Mayer, Thierry, 2006. "Regional wage and employment responses to market potential in the EU," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 573-594, September.
    7. Crozet, Matthieu & Trionfetti, Federico, 2008. "Trade costs and the Home Market Effect," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 309-321, December.
    8. Friederike Niepmann & Gabriel J. Felbermayr, 2010. "Globalisation and the Spatial Concentration of Production," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 680-709, May.
    9. Huang, Yo-Yi & Huang, Deng-Shing, 2014. "Big vs. small under free trade: Market size and size distribution of firms," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 175-189.
    10. Hajime Takatsuka & Dao‐Zhi Zeng, 2018. "Elastic labor supply, variable markups, and spatial inequalities," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 1084-1100, November.
    11. Auer, Raphael A., 2017. "Product heterogeneity, cross-country taste differences, and the growth of world trade," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 1-27.
    12. Garcia Pires, Armando J., 2013. "Home market effects with endogenous costs of production," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 47-58.
    13. Yo-Yi Huang & Cheng-Te Lee & Deng-Shing Huang, 2014. "Home Market Effects In The Chamberlinian–Ricardian World," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(S1), pages 36-54, December.
    14. Erhardt, Katharina, 2017. "On home market effects and firm heterogeneity," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 316-340.
    15. BEHRENS, Kristian, 2004. "Market size and urban hierarchy," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2004029, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    16. J. Suedekum, 2007. "Identifying the dynamic home market effect in a three-country model," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 209-228, December.
    17. Ai‐Ting Goh & Tomasz Kamil Michalski, 2010. "Should Small Countries Fear Deindustrialization?," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 607-617, September.
    18. Hajime Takatsuka & Dao-Zhi Zeng, 2012. "Mobile capital and the home market effect," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 45(3), pages 1062-1082, August.
    19. Dao‐Zhi Zeng & Toru Kikuchi, 2009. "Home Market Effect And Trade Costs," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 60(2), pages 253-270, June.
    20. Armando Garcia Pires, 2012. "International trade and competitiveness," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 50(3), pages 727-763, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:ucscec:qt8sv3q6qv. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecucsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.