IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cje/issued/v38y2005i1p255-272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade, market size, and industrial structure: revisiting the home-market effect

Author

Listed:
  • Zhihao Yu

Abstract

This paper shows that the issues in the recent discussion over the `home-market effects' are more complicated than previously thought. It is shown that, in general, market size matters for industrial structure even when both the homogeneous and the differentiated goods face transport costs. The home-market effect for production structure can arise, disappear, or even reverse in sign. The analysis shall change a common perception about de-industrialization of (small) economies and may also have important implications for the empirical research strategies in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhihao Yu, 2005. "Trade, market size, and industrial structure: revisiting the home-market effect," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 38(1), pages 255-272, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cje:issued:v:38:y:2005:i:1:p:255-272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economics.ca/cgi/xms?jab=v38n1/14.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: Available to subscribers only. Alternative access through JSTOR and Ingenta.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Takatsuka, Hajime & Zeng, Dao-Zhi, 2012. "Trade liberalization and welfare: Differentiated-good versus homogeneous-good markets," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 308-325.
    2. Haiwen Zhou, 2007. "Increasing Returns, the Choice of Technology, and the Gains from Trade," Southern Economic Journal, Southern Economic Association, vol. 74(2), pages 581-600, October.
    3. Hiroshi Goto & Keiya Minamimura, 2014. "Fertility, Regional Demographics, and Economic Integration," Discussion Papers 1405, Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University.
    4. Haiwen Zhou, 2014. "International Trade with Increasing Returns in the Transportation Sector," Frontiers of Economics in China, Higher Education Press, vol. 9(4), pages 606-633, December.
    5. Ai-Ting Goh & Tomasz Kamil Michalski, 2010. "Should Small Countries Fear Deindustrialization?," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 607-617, September.
    6. Dao-Zhi Zeng & Toru Kikuchi, 2005. "The Home Market Effect and the Agricultural Sector," ERSA conference papers ersa05p135, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Behrens, Kristian & Lamorgese, Andrea R. & Ottaviano, Gianmarco I.P. & Tabuchi, Takatoshi, 2009. "Beyond the home market effect: Market size and specialization in a multi-country world," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 259-265, November.
    8. Hayato Kato, 2017. "Lobbying and Tax Competition in an Oligopolistic Industry: A Reverse Home Market Effect," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2017-028, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
    9. Kyoko Hirose & Yushi Yoshida, 2010. "Intra-National Regional Heterogeneity in International Trade," Discussion Papers 42, Kyushu Sangyo University, Faculty of Economics.
    10. Yamamoto, Kazuhiro, 2008. "Location of industry, market size, and imperfect international capital mobility," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 518-532, September.
    11. Lei Wen & Haiwen Zhou, 2012. "Financial and Product Market Integration under Increasing Returns to Scale," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 38(1), pages 18-36.
    12. Kato, Hayato, 2015. "Lobbying and Tax Competition in an Agglomeration Economy: A Reverse Home Market Effect," CCES Discussion Paper Series 56, Center for Research on Contemporary Economic Systems, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
    13. Giraldo, Iader & Jaramillo, Fernando, 2016. "Productivity, Demand and the Home Market Effect," DOCUMENTOS DE TRABAJO 014447, UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO.
    14. Garcia Pires, Armando J., 2013. "Home market effects with endogenous costs of production," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 47-58.
    15. Hiroshi Goto & Keiya Minamimura, 2015. "Geography and Demography: New Economic Geography with Endogenous Fertility," Discussion Paper Series DP2015-33, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    16. Hege Medin, 2017. "The reverse home-market effect in exports: a cross-country study of the extensive margin of exports," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut fĂĽr Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 153(2), pages 301-325, May.
    17. Dao-Zhi Zeng & Toru Kikuchi, 2009. "Home Market Effect And Trade Costs," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 60(2), pages 253-270.
    18. repec:bla:reviec:v:25:y:2017:i:1:p:76-97 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Pham, Cong S. & Lovely, Mary E. & Mitra, Devashish, 2009. "The home-market effect and bilateral trade patterns: a reexamination of the evidence," Economics Series eco_2009_12, Deakin University, Faculty of Business and Law, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance.
    20. Huang, Yo-Yi & Huang, Deng-Shing, 2014. "Big vs. small under free trade: Market size and size distribution of firms," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 175-189.
    21. Yo-Yi Huang & Cheng-Te Lee & Deng-Shing Huang, 2014. "Home Market Effects In The Chamberlinian–Ricardian World," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(S1), pages 36-54, December.
    22. Pham, Cong S. & Lovely, Mary E. & Mitra, Devashish, 2014. "The home-market effect and bilateral trade patterns: A reexamination of the evidence," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 120-137.
    23. Barbero, Javier & Behrens, Kristian & Zofio, Jose L., 2015. "Industry location and wages: The role of market size and accessibility in trading networks," CEPR Discussion Papers 10411, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F12 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies; Fragmentation
    • L1 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cje:issued:v:38:y:2005:i:1:p:255-272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Prof. Werner Antweiler). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ceaaaea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.