IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bon/boncrc/crctr224_2025_781.html

Recommendation Power: Platform Objectives and the Digital Markets Act

Author

Listed:
  • Jens-Uwe Franck
  • Martin Peitz

Abstract

Digital platforms allocate scarce attention through rankings, recommendations, defaults, and prominence. This article develops the concept of recommendation power as the point of intersection between two established concepts: information power and intermediation power, which is the capability to actively steer user choice by a platform that is a bottleneck for effective access. We propose a taxonomy of the objectives that typically guide platforms’ recommendation design, distinguishing an independent-advice benchmark from fifteen other objectives that may motivate systematic departures from it, grouped into direct commercial and data objectives, indirect and strategic objectives, and objectives relating to influence, welfare, and integrity. We then analyze how the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) constrains recommender design, though it does not regulate recommendation power as such. Through obligations on ranking and data and transparency duties as well as through its anticircumvention provisions, the DMA protects certain user choices and access rights from the exercise of recommendation power.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens-Uwe Franck & Martin Peitz, 2026. "Recommendation Power: Platform Objectives and the Digital Markets Act," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2025_781, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2025_781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.crctr224.de/research/discussion-papers/archive/dp781
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law
    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality
    • L40 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - General
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2025_781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CRC Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.crctr224.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.