IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bon/boncrc/crctr224_2025_679v2.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Horizontal Differentiation of Tasks and Skills: Internal and External Labor Markets, Part 1

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Ruckes
  • Konrad O. Stahl

Abstract

When workers’ skills can only be revealed by matches into tasks, and then only via the productivity of their teams, productivity-improving internal re-matching should improve on skill information to the external market. We show that this is not necessarily so. Information generated in more productive firms may become garbled, even overturning productivity advantages generated in the internal market. We derive this and other results within a parsimonious parametric model in which we transfer and adapt the horizontal differentiation model known from the IO literature to a labor market characterized by symmetric imperfect information about the typical worker’s skills. Information about these skills is revealed only indirectly via the productivity of the teams in which the workers are active. Firms as teams vary in size, and technology reflected in their structure of tasks from specialized to diversified. Frictionless re-matching within the internal labor market improves on the team’s productivity. Misalignment between the distribution of skills and that of tasks can be removed only by external labor market actions, constrained by informational frictions. In part 1 of this paper, we analyze internal market equilibrium. For external market activities, we assume that firms can realize their imperfectly informed desired demand from a supply in which skills are revealed perfectly. In part 2, we realistically consider labor supply in the external market as in part furnished by separations, and structured by signals involving the typical worker’s employment history. We demonstrate generic opposite effects of internal on external market activities. In the internal market, constrained efficient re-matching yields the average productivity of firms to increase in size and diversity of structure. External market activity improves on firms’ expected productivity, but the strength of improvement decreases in firm size and diversity of structure: The more internal re-matching leads to leftward skewness in the distribution of firms towards higher productivity, the less informative is the specification of desired demand (and, as we show in part 2: in the supply) in the external market, which may overturn internal market effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Ruckes & Konrad O. Stahl, 2025. "Horizontal Differentiation of Tasks and Skills: Internal and External Labor Markets, Part 1," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2025_679v2, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany, revised Jun 2025.
  • Handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2025_679v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.crctr224.de/research/discussion-papers/archive/dp679
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoffrey Tate & Liu Yang, 2015. "The Bright Side of Corporate Diversification: Evidence from Internal Labor Markets," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 28(8), pages 2203-2249.
    2. Emmanuelle Auriol & Guido Friebel & Lambros Pechlivanos, 2002. "Career Concerns in Teams," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 20(2), pages 289-307, Part.
    3. Elena Pastorino, 2015. "Job Matching Within And Across Firms," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56(2), pages 647-671, May.
    4. Bengt Holmstrom, 1982. "Moral Hazard in Teams," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 13(2), pages 324-340, Autumn.
    5. Elena Pastorino, 2015. "Job Matching Within And Across Firms," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56, pages 647-671, May.
    6. Chalioti, Evangelia, 2016. "Team production, endogenous learning about abilities and career concerns," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 229-244.
    7. Li, Fei & Tian, Can, 2013. "Directed search and job rotation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(3), pages 1268-1281.
    8. Hector Chade & Jan Eeckhout & Lones Smith, 2017. "Sorting through Search and Matching Models in Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 55(2), pages 493-544, June.
    9. Theodore Papageorgiou, 2014. "Learning Your Comparative Advantages," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 81(3), pages 1263-1295.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2025_679 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jan Eeckhout & Xi Weng, 2022. "Assortative Learning," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(355), pages 647-688, July.
    3. Jackson Bunting & Paul Diegert & Arnaud Maurel, 2024. "Heterogeneity, Uncertainty and Learning: Semiparametric Identification and Estimation," Papers 2402.08575, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    4. Papageorgiou, Theodore, 2018. "Large firms and within firm occupational reallocation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 184-223.
    5. Jeronimo Carballo & Richard K. Mansfield & Charles Adam Pfander, 2024. "U.S. Worker Mobility Across Establishments within Firms: Scope, Prevalence, and Effects on Worker Earnings," NBER Working Papers 32420, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Jaime Ortega, 2003. "Power in the Firm and Managerial Career Concerns," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, March.
    7. Shuo Liu & Diego Battiston & Miguel Espinosa, 2021. "Talent Poaching and Job Rotation," Working Papers 1237, Barcelona School of Economics.
    8. Friebel, Guido & Schnedler, Wendelin, 2011. "Team governance: Empowerment or hierarchical control," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(1-2), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Ester Manna, 2015. "Intrinsically Motivated Agents in Teams," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2015/326, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    10. Meagher, Kieron & Prasad, Suraj, 2016. "Career concerns and team talent," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1-17.
    11. Ola Kvaløy & Trond E. Olsen, 2008. "Cooperation in Knowledge-Intensive Firms," Journal of Human Capital, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(4), pages 410-440.
    12. Alexander K. Koch & Albrecht Morgenstern, 2005. "From Team Spirit to Jealousy: The Pitfalls of Too Much Transparency," Royal Holloway, University of London: Discussion Papers in Economics 05/08, Department of Economics, Royal Holloway University of London, revised Jul 2005.
    13. Dalvit, Nicolò & Patel, Aseem & Tan, Joanne, 2022. "Intra-firm hierarchies and gender gaps," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    14. Thakur, Ashutosh & Bendor, Jonathan, 2024. "Endogenous reorganization: Status, productivity & meritocratic dynamics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    15. Koch Alexander K & Morgenstern Albrecht, 2010. "Coordination under the Shadow of Career Concerns," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-40, March.
    16. repec:awi:wpaper:0457 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Hakenes, Hendrik & Katolnik, Svetlana, 2017. "On the incentive effects of job rotation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 424-441.
    18. Vereshchagina, Galina, 2019. "The role of individual financial contributions in the formation of entrepreneurial teams," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 173-193.
    19. Sijun Wang & Yuanjie He, 2008. "Compensating Nondedicated Cross-Functional Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(5), pages 753-765, October.
    20. Rajesh K. Aggarwal & Andrew A. Samwick, 1999. "Executive Compensation, Strategic Competition, and Relative Performance Evaluation: Theory and Evidence," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 54(6), pages 1999-2043, December.
    21. Bogetoft, Peter & Nielsen, Kurt, 2003. "Yardstick Based Procurement Design In Natural Resource Management," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25910, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    22. Martin Peitz & Sven Rady & Piers Trepper, 2017. "Experimentation in Two-Sided Markets," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 128-172.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
    • J23 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Demand
    • J62 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Job, Occupational and Intergenerational Mobility; Promotion
    • L23 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Organization of Production

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2025_679v2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CRC Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.crctr224.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.