IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bfr/banfra/960.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

High Voltage: Financing the Path to Zero Coal

Author

Listed:
  • Camille Macaire
  • Fabio Grieco
  • Ulrich Volz
  • Alain Naef

Abstract

Keeping global warming under 1.5°C requires a complete phase-out of coal for electricity generation by 2040 according to the International Energy Agency’s Net Zero Emissions by 2050 (NZE) scenario. In this paper, we use unit-level data from the Global Coal Plant Tracker database to build a phase-out priority score and identify the coal-fired power plants that would need to be decommissioned now to comply with this pathway. We assume the other coal power plants continue to operate to the end of their lifetime. We show that 70% of the capacity of the operating coal fleet should be shut down now, which corresponds to stranded assets worth $842 billion globally. Replacing the coal capacities by equivalent low-carbon capacities would imply a much larger one-off cost of $4.5 trillion worldwide. This upfront investment would also imply large debt financing costs, estimated at $3.1 trillion globally, which would drive up the total cost to $8.4 trillion. But coal plants have much higher operational costs than low-carbon ones, in part because they need fuel to operate, and the cost of CO2 emissions need to be priced. We show that cumulated net operational gains linked to replacing coal plants with low-carbon alternative to comply with the 1.5°C would amount to $3.8 trillion worldwide, thus offsetting close to half of the total costs. By lowering financing costs and increasing carbon pricing in line with the International Energy Agency’s NZE scenario, the total equation could become positive, that is, total savings from the transition to clean energy would be higher than the total costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Camille Macaire & Fabio Grieco & Ulrich Volz & Alain Naef, 2024. "High Voltage: Financing the Path to Zero Coal," Working papers 960, Banque de France.
  • Handle: RePEc:bfr:banfra:960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.banque-france.fr/system/files/2024-09/WP960.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yangsiyu Lu & Francois Cohen & Stephen M. Smith & Alexander Pfeiffer, 2022. "Plant conversions and abatement technologies cannot prevent stranding of power plant assets in 2 °C scenarios," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Matthias Kalkuhl & Jan Christoph Steckel & Lorenzo Montrone & Michael Jakob & Jörg Peters & Ottmar Edenhofer, 2019. "Successful coal phase-out requires new models of development," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(11), pages 897-900, November.
    3. Kefford, Benjamin M. & Ballinger, Benjamin & Schmeda-Lopez, Diego R. & Greig, Chris & Smart, Simon, 2018. "The early retirement challenge for fossil fuel power plants in deep decarbonisation scenarios," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 294-306.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing-Li Fan & Zezheng Li & Xi Huang & Kai Li & Xian Zhang & Xi Lu & Jianzhong Wu & Klaus Hubacek & Bo Shen, 2023. "A net-zero emissions strategy for China’s power sector using carbon-capture utilization and storage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Blankenship, Brian & Aklin, Michaël & Urpelainen, Johannes & Nandan, Vagisha, 2022. "Jobs for a just transition: Evidence on coal job preferences from India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    3. Klöckner, Kai & Letmathe, Peter, 2020. "Is the coherence of coal phase-out and electrolytic hydrogen production the golden path to effective decarbonisation?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    4. Ernesto Rivas & María Ángeles Martín-Lara & Gabriel Blázquez & Antonio Pérez & Mónica Calero, 2019. "Column Leaching Tests to Valorize a Solid Waste from the Decommissioning of Coal-Fired Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Miroslav Variny, 2022. "Comment on Rogalev et al. Structural and Parametric Optimization of S-CO 2 Thermal Power Plants with a Pulverized Coal-Fired Boiler Operating in Russia. Energies 2021, 14 , 7136," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-5, February.
    6. Le Treut, Gaëlle & Lefèvre, Julien & Lallana, Francisco & Bravo, Gonzalo, 2021. "The multi-level economic impacts of deep decarbonization strategies for the energy system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Yuan, Huazhi & Wang, Shuai & Wang, Chaohui & Song, Zhi & Li, Yanwei, 2022. "Design of piezoelectric device compatible with pavement considering traffic: Simulation, laboratory and on-site," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    8. Maamoun, Nada & Kennedy, Ryan & Jin, Xiaomeng & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2020. "Identifying coal-fired power plants for early retirement," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    9. Chakravarty, Shoibal & Somanathan, E., 2021. "There is no economic case for new coal plants in India," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    10. Papadis, Elisa & Tsatsaronis, George, 2020. "Challenges in the decarbonization of the energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    11. Fan, Jing-Li & Li, Zezheng & Ding, Zixia & Li, Kai & Zhang, Xian, 2023. "Investment decisions on carbon capture utilization and storage retrofit of Chinese coal-fired power plants based on real option and source-sink matching models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    12. Ansari, Dawud & Holz, Franziska, 2020. "Between stranded assets and green transformation: Fossil-fuel-producing developing countries towards 2055," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    13. Robi Kurniawan & Gregory P. Trencher & Achmed S. Edianto & Imam E. Setiawan & Kazuyo Matsubae, 2020. "Understanding the Multi-Faceted Drivers of Increasing Coal Consumption in Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    14. Pereira , Alfredo Marvão & Pereira, Rui Manuel, 2021. "On the Macroeconomic and Distributional Effects of the Regulated Closure of Coal-Operated Power Plants," Journal of Economic Development, The Economic Research Institute, Chung-Ang University, vol. 46(4), pages 1-30, December.
    15. Kühne, Kjell & Bartsch, Nils & Tate, Ryan Driskell & Higson, Julia & Habet, André, 2022. "“Carbon Bombs” - Mapping key fossil fuel projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    16. Fan, Jing-Li & Li, Zezheng & Li, Kai & Zhang, Xian, 2022. "Modelling plant-level abatement costs and effects of incentive policies for coal-fired power generation retrofitted with CCUS," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    17. Fu, Yue & Wang, Liyuan & Liu, Ming & Wang, Jinshi & Yan, Junjie, 2023. "Performance analysis of coal-fired power plants integrated with carbon capture system under load-cycling operation conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    18. Kleinnijenhuis, Alissa & Adrian, Tobias & Bolton, Patrick, 2022. "The Great Carbon Arbitrage," INET Oxford Working Papers 2022-07, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    19. Jindal, Abhinav & Shrimali, Gireesh, 2022. "Cost–benefit analysis of coal plant repurposing in developing countries: A case study of India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    20. Steckel, Jan C. & Jakob, Michael, 2021. "The political economy of coal: Lessons learnt from 15 country case studies," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Coal Phase-out; Transition Pathways; De-carbonization; Early Retirement Strategy; Just Transition;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy
    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfr:banfra:960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael brassart (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdfgvfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.