IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2607.17649.html

Ageing in which place? Spatial analytical framework for evaluating ageing-in-place practices

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Tu
  • Yaopei Wang
  • Yumeng Yang
  • Yi Fan

Abstract

Over the past decade, governments around the world have made significant investments in creating elderly-friendly urban environments within local neighborhoods. However, the lack of a standardized evaluation framework for Ageing-in-Place (AIP) practices makes it challenging to generalize these experiences. First, we compare the AIP models of the U.S.- San Francisco, Japan-Tokyo, and Singapore using a cost-benefit analysis, demonstrating the comparative advantage of the Singapore model in terms of low cost and high accessibility for the independent ageing population. Second, we propose a spatial analytics framework to visualize and quantify the degree of alignment between a basket of ageing facilities and the active ageing population, enabling a data-driven, timely evaluation of the effectiveness of Singapore's AIP policies. Singapore's AIP model, either in its entirety or as a hybrid with other models, can be generalized to other global cities, providing valuable insights for optimal elderly-friendly urban planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Tu & Yaopei Wang & Yumeng Yang & Yi Fan, 2026. "Ageing in which place? Spatial analytical framework for evaluating ageing-in-place practices," Papers 2607.17649, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.17649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.17649
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard W. Martin, 2004. "Spatial Mismatch and the Structure of American Metropolitan Areas, 1970–2000," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 467-488, August.
    2. John W. Rowe & Robert L. Kahn, 2015. "Successful Aging 2.0: Conceptual Expansions for the 21st Century," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(4), pages 593-596.
    3. Laurent Gobillon & Dominique Meurs & Sébastien Roux, 2015. "Estimating Gender Differences in Access to Jobs," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(2), pages 317-363.
    4. Seonghoon Kim & Kanghyock Koh, 2022. "Health insurance and subjective well‐being: Evidence from two healthcare reforms in the United States," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 233-249, January.
    5. Wang, Yixiao & Yang, Wei & Avendano, Mauricio, 2022. "Does informal care reduce health care utilisation in older age? Evidence from China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    6. Danilo Bzdok & Robin I. M. Dunbar, 2022. "Social isolation and the brain in the pandemic era," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(10), pages 1333-1343, October.
    7. Laurent Gobillon & Harris Selod & Yves Zenou, 2007. "The Mechanisms of Spatial Mismatch," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(12), pages 2401-2427, November.
    8. Huang, Guanying & Li, Dezhi & Zhou, Shenghua & Ng, S. Thomas & Wang, Wentao & Wang, Lingxiao, 2025. "Public opinion on smart infrastructure in China: Evidence from social media," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    9. Catherine Bigonnesse & Habib Chaudhury, 2022. "Ageing in place processes in the neighbourhood environment: a proposed conceptual framework from a capability approach," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 63-74, March.
    10. Ann Forsyth & Jennifer Molinsky, 2021. "What Is Aging in Place? Confusions and Contradictions," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 181-196, March.
    11. Repo, Virve, 2024. "Spatial solidarity among older adults in age-related housing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    12. Rolf G. Heinze & Gerhard Naegele, 2012. "Social Innovations in Ageing Societies," Springer Books, in: Hans-Werner Franz & Josef Hochgerner & Jürgen Howaldt (ed.), Challenge Social Innovation, edition 127, pages 153-167, Springer.
    13. John F. Kain, 1968. "Housing Segregation, Negro Employment, and Metropolitan Decentralization," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 82(2), pages 175-197.
    14. Sun, Wenwen & Jin, Hongyu & Chen, Yan & Hu, Xin & Li, Zhuoran & Kidd, Akari & Liu, Chunlu, 2021. "Spatial mismatch analyses of school land in China using a spatial statistical approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    15. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-01206083 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Harry J. Holzer, 1991. "The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: What Has the Evidence Shown?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 28(1), pages 105-122, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yao & Wang, Yixuan & Zhu, Tianyun, 2026. "Steering and spatial mismatch," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Reichelt, Malte & Haas, Anette, 2015. "Commuting farther and earning more? : how employment density moderates workers commuting distance," IAB-Discussion Paper 201533, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    3. Maré, David C. & Fabling, Richard & Hyslop, Dean R., 2023. "Job Displacement and Local Employment Density," IZA Discussion Papers 16685, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. Matthew Hall & John Iceland & Youngmin Yi, 2019. "Racial Separation at Home and Work: Segregation in Residential and Workplace Settings," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 38(5), pages 671-694, October.
    5. Janeria Easley, 2018. "Spatial mismatch beyond black and white: Levels and determinants of job access among Asian and Hispanic subpopulations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(8), pages 1800-1820, June.
    6. Judith K. Hellerstein & David Neumark, 2011. "Employment in Black Urban Labor Markets: Problems and Solutions," NBER Working Papers 16986, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Emre Korsu & Sandrine Wenglenski, 2010. "Job Accessibility, Residential Segregation and Risk of Long-term Unemployment in the Paris Region," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(11), pages 2279-2324, October.
    8. Huiping Li & Harrison Campbell & Steven Fernandez, 2013. "Residential Segregation, Spatial Mismatch and Economic Growth across US Metropolitan Areas," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(13), pages 2642-2660, October.
    9. Hyunjoo Eom, 2023. "Recent intra‐metropolitan patterns of spatial mismatch: Implications for black suburbanization and the changing geography of mismatch," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 421-445, June.
    10. Suhong Zhou & Zhidong Wu & Luping Cheng, 2013. "The Impact of Spatial Mismatch on Residents in Low-income Housing Neighbourhoods: A Study of the Guangzhou Metropolis, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(9), pages 1817-1835, July.
    11. Mondschein, Andrew Samuel, 2013. "The Personal City: The Experiential, Cognitive Nature of Travel and Activity and Implications for Accessibility," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7014d9cg, University of California Transportation Center.
    12. Pinto, Davi Garcia Lopes & Loureiro, Carlos Felipe Grangeiro & Sousa, Francelino Franco Leite de Matos & Motte-Baumvol, Benjamin, 2023. "The effects of informality on socio-spatial inequalities in accessibility to job opportunities: Evidence from Fortaleza, Brazil," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    13. Bernal, David & García, Gustavo A. & Pérez Pérez, Jorge, 2025. "Better or worse job accessibility? Understanding changes in spatial mismatch: Evidence from Medellín, Colombia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    14. Cho, Heepyung, 2022. "Driver’s license reforms and job accessibility among undocumented immigrants," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    15. Luisa Alamá-Sabater & Yolanda de Llanos & Miguel Á. Márquez & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2025. "Evaluating the spatial mismatch between population and factor endowments: The case of the European Union," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 2387811-238, December.
    16. Tobias Theys & Nick Deschacht & Stef Adriaenssens & Dieter Verhaest, 2019. "The evolution of inter-regional spatial mismatch in the USA: The role of skills and spatial structure," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(13), pages 2654-2669, October.
    17. Maud M. Hensen & M. Robert De Vries & Frank Cörvers, 2009. "The role of geographic mobility in reducing education‐job mismatches in the Netherlands," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(3), pages 667-682, August.
    18. Sari, Florent, 2015. "Public transit and labor market outcomes: Analysis of the connections in the French agglomeration of Bordeaux," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 231-251.
    19. Olof Åslund & John Östh & Yves Zenou, 2010. "How important is access to jobs? Old question--improved answer," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 389-422, May.
    20. Ana Maria Bonomi Barufi & Eduardo Amaral Haddad, 2017. "Spatial mismatch, wages and unemployment in metropolitan areas in Brazil," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 4, pages 175-200.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.17649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.