IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.03527.html

Algorithmic Information Design for Searchers with Uncertain Alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Zhicheng Du
  • Hu Fu
  • Ying Qin
  • Zihe Wang

Abstract

Advertisements reveal information to consumers who decide on further information acquisition and eventual purchase. Anderson and Renault (2006) first modeled this problem using an information-design framework where the advertiser acts as a sender and the consumer as a receiver. Due to search frictions and the consumer's outside option, search for additional information is not always worthwhile for the receiver. Thus, the sender's information design is used to make further search attractive and ultimately induce purchase. Following Lyu (2023), we study the optimal information design for a sender who sells search goods to a consumer with uncertain alternatives. Instead of making relaxations to the sender's problem (as done in Lyu, 2023), we work directly on the joint distribution over realized values and signals. Our contributions are twofold. First, we give a method, based on duality arguments, to verify whether a given information strategy is optimal. We illustrate the value of this verification framework in a competitive extension, where it certifies a non-trivial symmetric equilibrium for two senders with a common convex prior. Second, on the algorithmic front, we develop an FPTAS that finds for the seller a signaling scheme whose utility differs from that of the optimal solution by at most an additive $\epsilon$ error, for any $\epsilon > 0$.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhicheng Du & Hu Fu & Ying Qin & Zihe Wang, 2026. "Algorithmic Information Design for Searchers with Uncertain Alternatives," Papers 2606.03527, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.03527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.03527
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gentzkow, Matthew & Kamenica, Emir, 2017. "Bayesian persuasion with multiple senders and rich signal spaces," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 411-429.
    2. Mahsa Derakhshan & Negin Golrezaei & Vahideh Manshadi & Vahab Mirrokni, 2022. "Product Ranking on Online Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 4024-4041, June.
    3. Emir Kamenica, 2019. "Bayesian Persuasion and Information Design," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 249-272, August.
    4. Eitan Sapiro-Gheiler, 2024. "Persuasion with ambiguous receiver preferences," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 77(4), pages 1173-1218, June.
    5. Piotr Dworczak & Giorgio Martini, 2019. "The Simple Economics of Optimal Persuasion," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(5), pages 1993-2048.
    6. Doval, Laura, 2018. "Whether or not to open Pandora's box," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 127-158.
    7. Pak Hung Au & Keiichi Kawai, 2021. "Competitive disclosure of correlated information," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(3), pages 767-799, October.
    8. Nelson, Phillip, 1970. "Information and Consumer Behavior," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(2), pages 311-329, March-Apr.
    9. Li, Fei & Norman, Peter, 2021. "Sequential persuasion," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 16(2), May.
    10. Mark Armstrong, 2017. "Ordered Consumer Search," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 15(5), pages 989-1024.
    11. Milgrom, Paul & Roberts, John, 1986. "Price and Advertising Signals of Product Quality," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(4), pages 796-821, August.
    12. Raphael Boleslavsky & Christopher Cotton, 2018. "Limited capacity in project selection: competition through evidence production," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 65(2), pages 385-421, March.
    13. Dirk Bergemann & Stephen Morris, 2019. "Information Design: A Unified Perspective," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 57(1), pages 44-95, March.
    14. Pak Hung Au & Mark Whitmeyer, 2023. "Attraction versus Persuasion: Information Provision in Search Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 131(1), pages 202-245.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shih-Tang Su & Vijay G. Subramanian, 2022. "Order of Commitments in Bayesian Persuasion with Partial-informed Senders," Papers 2202.06479, arXiv.org.
    2. Lyu, Chen, 2023. "Information design for selling search goods and the effect of competition," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Teddy Mekonnen & Bobak Pakzad-Hurson, 2024. "Competition, Persuasion, and Search," Papers 2411.11183, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    4. Kun Zhang, 2025. "Uncharted Waters: Selling a New Product Robustly," Papers 2508.04134, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
    5. Raphael Boleslavsky & Silvana Krasteva, 2025. "Limits of Disclosure in Search Markets," Papers 2506.06319, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    6. Ozan Candogan, 2022. "Persuasion in Networks: Public Signals and Cores," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(4), pages 2264-2298, July.
    7. Raphael Boleslavsky & Mehdi Shadmehr, 2023. "Signaling With Commitment," Papers 2305.00777, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2025.
    8. Niloufar Mirzavand Boroujeni & Krishnamurthy Iyer & William L. Cooper, 2025. "Decentralized Signaling Mechanisms," Papers 2504.14163, arXiv.org.
    9. Ziv Scully & Laura Doval, 2024. "Local hedging approximately solves Pandora's box problems with nonobligatory inspection," Papers 2410.19011, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    10. He, Wei & Li, Jiangtao, 2023. "Competitive information disclosure in random search markets," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 132-153.
    11. Sato, Hiroto & Shirakawa, Ryo, 2025. "Information structures in college admissions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    12. Mustafa Dogan & Ju Hu, 2022. "Consumer search and optimal information," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 53(2), pages 386-403, June.
    13. Little, Andrew T., 2022. "Bayesian Explanations for Persuasion," OSF Preprints ygw8e, Center for Open Science.
    14. Mark Armstrong & Jidong Zhou, 2022. "Consumer Information and the Limits to Competition," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(2), pages 534-577, February.
    15. Atakan, Alp & Ekmekci, Mehmet & Renou, Ludovic, 2024. "Cross-verification and persuasive cheap talk," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    16. Whitmeyer, Joseph & Whitmeyer, Mark, 2021. "Mixtures of mean-preserving contractions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    17. Yiling Chen & Tao Lin & Wei Tang & Jamie Tucker-Foltz, 2025. "Explainable Information Design," Papers 2508.14196, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    18. Ozan Candogan & Philipp Strack, 2021. "Optimal Disclosure of Information to a Privately Informed Receiver," Papers 2101.10431, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    19. Gu, Jiadong, 2023. "Optimal stress tests and liquidation cost," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    20. repec:osf:osfxxx:ygw8e_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Teddy Mekonnen & Zeky Murra-Anton & Bobak Pakzad-Hurson, 2025. "Persuaded Search," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 133(10), pages 3167-3207.
      • Teddy Mekonnen & Zeky Murra-Anton & Bobak Pakzad-Hurson, 2023. "Persuaded Search," Papers 2303.13409, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.03527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.