IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2511.08218.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Who benefits from increases in military spending? An empirical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • John Beirne
  • Haroon Mumtaz
  • Donghyun Park
  • Gazi Salah Uddin
  • Angeliki Theophilopoulou

Abstract

This paper investigates the heterogeneous effects of military spending news shocks on household income and wealth inequality for a large, panel of advanced and emerging economies. Confirming prior literature, we find that military spending news shocks lead to persistent increases in aggregate output and Total Factor Productivity. Our primary contribution is documenting contrasting distributional impacts. We find that expansionary military spending is associated with a mitigation of income inequality, as income gains are disproportionately larger at the left tail of the distribution, primarily driven by a rise in labour income and employment in industry. Conversely, the shock is found to increase wealth inequality, particularly in high-income countries, by raising the wealth share of the top decile via effects on business asset holdings.

Suggested Citation

  • John Beirne & Haroon Mumtaz & Donghyun Park & Gazi Salah Uddin & Angeliki Theophilopoulou, 2025. "Who benefits from increases in military spending? An empirical analysis," Papers 2511.08218, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.08218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.08218
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.08218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.