IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2507.13137.html

Selling Consumer Data under Limited Commitment

Author

Listed:
  • Zihao Li

Abstract

A data broker repeatedly negotiates with a producer who has privately known production costs and values consumer data for price discrimination. The broker cannot commit to future offers. When he can offer rich menus of dataset--price pairs, the unique equilibrium outcome immediately implements the commitment-optimal mechanism, so limited commitment is irrelevant. When he can offer only a single dataset--price pair at a time, by contrast, we obtain a folk theorem. There is always an equilibrium in which the market clears immediately at a low price, while, when the parties are sufficiently patient, any payoff between this benchmark and the commitment payoff can be sustained. This multiplicity rests on a property specific to data: free disposal by the producer and zero marginal cost of provision make the efficient dataset for a given type nonunique, leaving the broker credible flexibility over future offers. Equilibrium multiplicity is therefore an economic prediction of the model, with identical fundamentals supporting persistently different negotiated outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Zihao Li, 2025. "Selling Consumer Data under Limited Commitment," Papers 2507.13137, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2507.13137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.13137
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Van Reenen, John, 2018. "Increasing differences between firms: market power and the macro-economy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 91698, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Bruno Strulovici, 2017. "Contract Negotiation and the Coase Conjecture: A Strategic Foundation for Renegotiation‐Proof Contracts," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 585-616, March.
    3. Viktor Stojkoski & Philipp Koch & Eva Coll & César A. Hidalgo, 2024. "Estimating digital product trade through corporate revenue data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Alex Gershkov & Benny Moldovanu & Philipp Strack & Mengxi Zhang, 2021. "A Theory of Auctions with Endogenous Valuations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(4), pages 1011-1051.
    5. Roland Strausz, 2017. "A Theory of Crowdfunding: A Mechanism Design Approach with Demand Uncertainty and Moral Hazard," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(6), pages 1430-1476, June.
    6. Strausz, Roland, 2017. "A Theory of Crowdfunding," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 2, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    7. Drew Fudenberg & David K. Levine & Jean Tirole, 1985. "Infinite-Horizon Models of Bargaining with One-Sided Incomplete Information," Levine's Working Paper Archive 1098, David K. Levine.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean Tirole & Paul-Henri Moisson & Pierre Dubois, 2023. "The (Ir)Relevance of the Cooperative Form," Working Papers hal-04963853, HAL.
    2. Ni, Jian & Xin, Yi & Yang, Fangzhu, 2025. "Financing micro-entrepreneurship in online crowdfunding markets: What drives local bias?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    3. Sylvain Dejean, 2020. "The role of distance and social networks in the geography of crowdfunding: evidence from France," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 329-339, March.
    4. Diandian Xiang & Leinan Zhang & Qiuyan Tao & Yonggui Wang & Shuang Ma, 2019. "Informational or emotional appeals in crowdfunding message strategy: an empirical investigation of backers’ support decisions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1046-1063, November.
    5. Marco Sahm, 2020. "Advance-Purchase Financing of Projects with Few Buyers," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 57(4), pages 909-933, December.
    6. Broere, Mark & Christmann, Robin, 2024. "Signaling and Fraud when Crowdfunding Campaigns Compete for Pledges," MPRA Paper 121784, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Tuo Gladys & Yi Feng & Sarpong Solomon & Wang Wenxin, 2020. "The Second Round Resource Acquisition of Entrepreneurial Crowdfunded Ventures: The Relevance of Campaign and Project Implementation Performance Outcomes," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Wayne Fu & Guangzhi Shang & Xun Tong, 2025. "Budget Disclosure in Crowdfunding: Information Asymmetry and Cost Transparency," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 659-678, March.
    9. Jiancheng Lyu & Xiaobei Shen & Yuqian Zhou & Xiangyin Kong, 2026. "Quality Signaling in Rewards-Based Crowdfunding: The Role of Deferred Payments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 1209-1226, July.
    10. Qingmin Liu & Konrad Mierendorff & Xianwen Shi & Weijie Zhong, 2019. "Auctions with Limited Commitment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(3), pages 876-910, March.
    11. Besancenot, Damien & Vranceanu, Radu, 2018. "Crowdfunding with overenthusiastic investors : a global game model," ESSEC Working Papers WP1802, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    12. Zirui Song & Yihui Lan & Yuan George Shan, 2026. "From Human Hands to Machine Minds: Financing AI‐Driven Entrepreneurship in Reward‐Based Crowdfunding," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 66(2), pages 1055-1076, June.
    13. Fang, Xing, 2022. "Why we hide good deeds? The selfless and anonymous donation behavior in crowdfunding," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Adena, Maja & Huck, Steffen, 2022. "Voluntary ‘donations’ versus reward-oriented ‘contributions’: two experiments on framing in funding mechanisms," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 25(5), pages 1399-1417.
    15. Georgiana-Loredana Schipor (Frecea), 2020. "Exploring the Crowdfunding Revolution: Reaching the Right Goal," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 1029-1036, August.
    16. Zhiyi Wang & Lusi Yang & Jungpil Hahn, 2023. "Winner Takes All? The Blockbuster Effect on Crowdfunding Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 935-960, September.
    17. Lin, Tse-Chun & Pursiainen, Vesa, 2023. "Gender differences in reward-based crowdfunding," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    18. Ehsan Bolandifar & Zhong Chen & Panos Kouvelis & Weihua Zhou, 2023. "Quality Signaling Through Crowdfunding Pricing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 668-685, March.
    19. Bi, Gongbing & Geng, Botao & Liu, Lindong, 2019. "On the fixed and flexible funding mechanisms in reward-based crowdfunding," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 168-183.
    20. Soudipta Chakraborty & Robert Swinney, 2021. "Signaling to the Crowd: Private Quality Information and Rewards-Based Crowdfunding," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 155-169, 1-2.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2507.13137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.