IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2401.12309.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Interpreting Event-Studies from Recent Difference-in-Differences Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Roth

Abstract

This note discusses the interpretation of event-study plots produced by recent difference-in-differences methods. I show that even when specialized to the case of non-staggered treatment timing, the default plots produced by software for three of the most popular recent methods (de Chaisemartin and D'Haultfoeuille, 2020; Callaway and SantAnna, 2021; Borusyak, Jaravel and Spiess, 2024) do not match those of traditional two-way fixed effects (TWFE) event-studies: the new methods may show a kink or jump at the time of treatment even when the TWFE event-study shows a straight line. This difference stems from the fact that the new methods construct the pre-treatment coefficients asymmetrically from the post-treatment coefficients. As a result, visual heuristics for analyzing TWFE event-study plots should not be immediately applied to those from these methods. I conclude with practical recommendations for constructing and interpreting event-study plots when using these methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Roth, 2024. "Interpreting Event-Studies from Recent Difference-in-Differences Methods," Papers 2401.12309, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2401.12309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.12309
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roth, Jonathan & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C. & Bilinski, Alyssa & Poe, John, 2023. "What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 2218-2244.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alex Hollingsworth & Krzysztof Karbownik & Melissa A. Thomasson & Anthony Wray, 2022. "The Gift of a Lifetime: The Hospital, Modern Medicine, and Mortality," NBER Working Papers 30663, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Todd Morris & Benoit Dostie, 2023. "Graying and staying on the job: The welfare implications of employment protection for older workers," Cahiers de recherche / Working Papers 15, Institut sur la retraite et l'épargne / Retirement and Savings Institute.
    3. Federica Daniele & Alessandra Pasquini & Stefano Clò & Enza Maltese, 2022. "Unburdening regulation: the impact of regulatory simplification on photovoltaic adoption in Italy," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1387, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    4. Wu, Guoyong & Gao, Yue & Feng, Yanchao, 2023. "Assessing the environmental effects of the supporting policies for mineral resource-exhausted cities in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    5. Jason Lennard & Meredith M. Paker, 2023. "Devaluation, Exports, and Recovery from the Great Depression," Discussion Papers 2403, Centre for Macroeconomics (CFM).
    6. Fiorini, Mario & Lee, Wooyong & Pfeifer, Gregor, 2024. "A Simple Approach to Staggered Difference-in-Differences in the Presence of Spillovers," IZA Discussion Papers 16868, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Mark Kattenberg & Bas Scheer & Jurre Thiel, 2023. "Causal forests with fixed effects for treatment effect heterogeneity in difference-in-differences," CPB Discussion Paper 452, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    8. Asatryan, Zareh & Baskaran, Thushyanthan & Birkholz, Carlo & Gomtsyan, David, 2021. "Favoritism and firms: Micro evidence and macro implications," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-031, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    9. Hans-Bernd Schaefer & Rok Spruk, 2024. "Islamic Law, Western European Law and the Roots of Middle East's Long Divergence: a Comparative Empirical Investigation (800-1600)," Papers 2401.14435, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    10. Léa Cimelli & Carole Bonnet & Anne Solaz, 2024. "Do late-life divorces produce greater gender inequalities? Evidence from administrative data," Working Papers 292, French Institute for Demographic Studies.
    11. Josh B. McGee, 2023. "Yes, money matters, but the details can make all the difference," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 1125-1132, September.
    12. Gustavo Joaquim & J. Christina Wang, 2022. "What Do 25 Million Records of Small Businesses Say about the Effects of the PPP?," Working Papers 22-23, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    13. Dami'an Vergara, 2022. "Minimum Wages and Optimal Redistribution," Papers 2202.00839, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    14. Henry Saffer & Markus Gehrsitz & Michael Grossman, 2022. "The Effects of Alcohol Excise Tax Increases by Drinking Level and by Income Level," NBER Working Papers 30097, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Dmitry Arkhangelsky & Guido Imbens, 2023. "Causal Models for Longitudinal and Panel Data: A Survey," Papers 2311.15458, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    16. Carattini, Stefano & Figge, Béla & Gordan, Alexander & Löschel, Andreas, 2022. "Municipal building codes and the adoption of solar photovoltaics," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116962, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Enzo Brox & Riccardo Di Francesco, 2024. "The Cost of Coming Out," Papers 2403.03649, arXiv.org.
    18. Elodie Andrieu & Malgorzata Kuczera, 2023. "Minimum Wage and Skills -Evidence from Job Vacancy Data," Working Papers 034, The Productivity Institute.
    19. Christian Krekel & Johannes Rode & Alexander Roth, 2023. "Do wind turbines have adverse health impacts," CEP Discussion Papers dp1950, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    20. Jamie O’Halloran & Anne Sophie Oxholm & Line Bjørnskov Pedersen & Dorte Gyrd‐Hansen, 2024. "Going the extra mile? General practitioners' upcoding of fees for home visits," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 197-203, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2401.12309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.