IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/apl/wpaper/26-01.html

Non-Attendance to Attribute Non-Attendance in Stated Preference Research

Author

Listed:
  • Paul R. Hindsley
  • Owen A. Morgan
  • John C. Whitehead

Abstract

Stated preference methods are often used to estimate benefits and costs for environmental and natural resource policy analysis, commonly relying on choice experiment questions in which respondents evaluate hypothetical scenarios with varying attributes. These applications generally assume that respondents pay attention to all attributes when making choices. However, attribute non-attendance, in which individuals ignore one or more attributes, may affect model estimates and willingness to pay. This paper critically examines the current state of research on attribute non-attendance in stated preference studies. We review the recent stated preference research to document when and how attribute non-attendance is incorporated in empirical applications. We then illustrate the implications of attribute non-attendance using marine resource choice experiment data in two case studies. We find differences in willingness to pay estimates between na•ve and attribute non-attendance models in both. Key Words: Attribute non-attendance, stated preferences, willingness to pay

Suggested Citation

  • Paul R. Hindsley & Owen A. Morgan & John C. Whitehead, 2026. "Non-Attendance to Attribute Non-Attendance in Stated Preference Research," Working Papers 26-01, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    • Handle: RePEc:apl:wpaper:26-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://econ.appstate.edu/RePEc/pdf/wp2601.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel R. Petrolia & Joonghyun Hwang, 2020. "Accounting for Attribute Non-attendance in Three Previously Published Choice Studies of Coastal Resources," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 35(3), pages 219-240.
    2. Paul Hindsley & Craig E. Landry & Kurt Schnier & John C. Whitehead & Mohammadreza Zarei, 2023. "Joint estimation of angler revealed preference site selection and stated preference choice experiment recreation data considering attribute non-attendance," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 44-62, January.
    3. Gonçalves, Tânia & Lourenço-Gomes, Lina & Pinto, Lígia M. Costa, 2022. "The role of attribute non-attendance on consumer decision-making: Theoretical insights and empirical evidence," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 788-805.
    4. Trey Malone & Jayson L Lusk, 2018. "A simple diagnostic measure of inattention bias in discrete choice models," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 45(3), pages 455-462.
    5. John C. Whitehead & Gregory Howard & Louis Cornicelli, 2025. "Total Economic Valuation of Great Lakes Recreational Fisheries: Attribute Nonattendance, Hypothetical Bias, and Insensitivity to Scope," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 101(4), pages 550-565.
    6. Curtis Rollins, 2023. "Investigating cost non‐attendance as a driver of inflated welfare estimates in mixed‐logit models," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 921-934, September.
    7. Daniel K. Lew, 2024. "Aggregating social benefits of endangered species protection: the case of the Cook Inlet beluga whale," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 168-187, April.
    8. Daniel R. Petrolia & Dennis Guignet & John Whitehead & Cannon Kent & Clay Caulder & Kelvin Amon, 2021. "Nonmarket Valuation in the Environmental Protection Agency's Regulatory Process," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(3), pages 952-969, September.
    9. Liqing Li & Amy W. Ando, 2023. "Early Exposure to Nature and Willingness to Pay for It: The Value of Tallgrass Prairie Grassland Restoration," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 99(4), pages 509-527.
    10. Paul Hindsley & Craig E. Landry & O. Ashton Morgan, 2020. "Incorporating Certainty and Attribute Non-attendance in Choice Experiments: An Application to Valuation of Coastal Habitat," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 35(3), pages 241-262.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tanga M. Mohr & John C. Whitehead, 2026. "External validity of inferred attribute non‐attendance: Evidence from a laboratory experiment with real and hypothetical payoffs," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 44(2), pages 367-379, April.
    2. Akinwehinmi, Oluwagbenga & Liesbeth, Colen & Vincenzina, Caputo, 2025. "Effect of Market-Level Risk Information on Consumer Willingness to Pay for Aflatoxin-Safe Food: Evidence from Unregulated Food Markets in Nigeria," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 360883, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Stanford, Garrett O. & Ferreira, Susana & Landry, Craig E. & Blachly, Ben, 2025. "Economic valuation of ecosystem services and natural infrastructure: A quantitative review of the literature," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Akinwehinmi, Titilayo & Birgit, Gassler & Ramona, Teuber, 2025. "Consumer Willingness to pay for Genetically Enhanced Foods in Nigeria: The Role of Nutrition and Process Information," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 360897, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Christian A. Vossler & Timothy N. Cason & James J. Murphy & Paul J. Ferraro & Todd L. Cherry & George Loewenstein & Peter Martinsson & Jason F. Shogren & Leaf van Boven & Daan van Soest, 2024. "The impact of experiments on environmental policy and natural resource management," Working Papers 2024-05, University of Tennessee, Department of Economics.
    6. James Macaskill & Patrick Lloyd‐Smith, 2022. "Six decades of environmental resource valuation in Canada: A synthesis of the literature," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 70(1), pages 73-89, March.
    7. Lagerkvist, C.J. & Edenbrandt, A.K. & Tibbelin, I. & Wahlstedt, Y., 2020. "Preferences for sustainable and responsible equity funds - A choice experiment with Swedish private investors," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    8. Guignet, Dennis & Jenkins, Robin R. & Nolte, Christoph & Belke, James, 2023. "The External Costs of Industrial Chemical Accidents: A Nationwide Property Value Study," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    9. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Rose, John M. & Oppewal, Harmen & Lancsar, Emily, 2021. "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Conceptualisation of external validity, sources and explanations of bias and effectiveness of mitigation methods," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    10. Haotian Cheng & Dayton M. Lambert & Karen L. DeLong & Kimberly L. Jensen, 2022. "Inattention, availability bias, and attribute premium estimation for a biobased product," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(2), pages 274-288, March.
    11. Yefan Nian & Zhifeng Gao & Rodolfo M. Nayga & Yuning Zhao & Joanna Van Asselt, 2026. "Trade‐Off Between Accuracy and Cognitive Burden: Influence of Stated Attribute Non‐Attendance Questions on Participants' Choice Behaviors," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 57(1), January.
    12. Lusk, Jayson L. & Tonsor, Glynn T. & Schroeder, Ted C. & Hayes, Dermot J., 2018. "Effect of government quality grade labels on consumer demand for pork chops in the short and long run," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 91-102.
    13. Boxebeld, Sander & Mouter, Niek & van Exel, Job, 2025. "Public preferences for skin cancer prevention policies: a discrete choice experiment in three European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 378(C).
    14. Andersson, Henrik & Ouvrard, Benjamin, 2023. "Priming and the value of a statistical life: A cross country comparison," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    15. Andersson, Henrik & Ouvrard, Benjamin, 2023. "Priming and the Value of a Statistical Life: A Cross Country Comparison," TSE Working Papers 23-1439, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    16. Aaron Staples & Bridget K. Behe & Patricia Huddleston & Trey Malone, 2022. "What you see is what you get, and what you don't goes unsold: Choice overload and purchasing heuristics in a horticulture lab experiment," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(3), pages 620-635, July.
    17. Trey Malone & Jayson L. Lusk, 2019. "Releasing The Trap: A Method To Reduce Inattention Bias In Survey Data With Application To U.S. Beer Taxes," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(1), pages 584-599, January.
    18. Milad Haghani & Michiel C. J. Bliemer & John M. Rose & Harmen Oppewal & Emily Lancsar, 2021. "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Macro-scale analysis of literature and effectiveness of bias mitigation methods," Papers 2102.02945, arXiv.org.
    19. Paul Hindsley & O. Ashton Morgan & John C. Whitehead, 2022. "Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Models for Artificial Reef Siting: A Study in the Florida Keys," Working Papers 22-05, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    20. Dennis Guignet & Matthew T. Heberling & Michael Papenfus & Olivia Griot, 2022. "Property Values, Water Quality, and Benefit Transfer: A Nationwide Meta-analysis," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 98(2), pages 191-218.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apl:wpaper:26-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: O. Ashton Morgan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deappus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.