IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aly/journl/202305.html

An institutional economic perspective on management in Chinese cultural contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy Kwok Frsa

    (Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (RSA), London, United Kingdom)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine various theoretical approaches used to manage in Chinese cultural settings, with a particular emphasis on cultural theories from institutional economics. Institutional economics offers explanations that are well-suited to understanding the rapid growth of the Chinese economy since the 1980s, when market-led economic reforms were introduced. This chapter provides a rigorous economic analysis that makes a strong contribution to the handbook, demonstrating the impact of economic institutional arrangements on the fast-growing Chinese economy. A significant contribution here is to highlight the complexity of managing in Chinese cultural settings. This complexity arises from the constantly changing soft institutions, such as the cultural practices of guanxi, which can vary significantly across different regions and communities. For instance, personal networks or guanxi are less important in overseas private Chinese businesses, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Due to economic activity, growth, and labor migration, there is a considerable cultural difference between different Chinese communities. Hong Kong, for example, has a distinct management culture compared to mainland China, as it has a long history of British administration and is an international trade and financial hub. This is evident in differences related to governance, the influence of the central government, relationships with foreign firms, human resources, and line management. The working language is predominantly English in Hong Kong, whereas Mandarin Chinese is the sole working language in mainland China.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy Kwok Frsa, "undated". "An institutional economic perspective on management in Chinese cultural contexts," Review of Socio - Economic Perspectives 202305, Reviewsep.
    • Handle: RePEc:aly:journl:202305
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.19275/RSEP148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://reviewsep.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/5_JEREMY.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://reviewsep.com/?page_id=2099
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.19275/RSEP148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carsten Herrmann-Pillath, 2006. "Cultural Species and Institutional Change in China," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 539-574, September.
    2. Avner Greif & Guido Tabellini, 2010. "Cultural and Institutional Bifurcation: China and Europe Compared," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(2), pages 135-140, May.
    3. Malcolm Rutherford, 2001. "Institutional Economics: Then and Now," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 173-194, Summer.
    4. Bardhan, Pranab, 1989. "The new institutional economics and development theory: A brief critical assessment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 17(9), pages 1389-1395, September.
    5. Hudik, Marek & Fang, Eddy S., 2020. "Money or in-kind gift? Evidence from red packets in China," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(5), pages 731-746, October.
    6. Jane Nolan & Chris Rowley, 2020. "Whither guanxi and social networks in China? A review of theory and practice," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 113-123, March.
    7. Fang Cai, 2010. "Chinese Rural Reform in 30 Years: An Analysis in Terms of Institutional Economics," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 5(1), pages 150-168, March.
    8. Barbara Krug & Hans Hendrischke, 2008. "Framing China: Transformation and Institutional Change through Co-evolution," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 4(1), pages 81-108, March.
    9. Hazel Gray, 2016. "Access Orders and the ‘New’ New Institutional Economics of Development," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 47(1), pages 51-75, January.
    10. Simeon Djankov, 2016. "The Doing Business Project: How It Started: Correspondence," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(1), pages 247-248, Winter.
    11. Guo, Ying & Rammal, Hussain G. & Benson, John & Zhu, Ying & Dowling, Peter J., 2018. "Interpersonal relations in China: Expatriates’ perspective on the development and use of guanxi," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 455-464.
    12. Yasheng Huang, 2002. "Managing Chinese Bureaucrats: An Institutional Economics Perspective," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 50(1), pages 61-79, March.
    13. Simeon Djankov, 2016. "The Doing Business Project: How It Started: Correspondence," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(1), pages 247-248, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yoonyoung Cho & Zaineb Majoka, 2020. "Pakistan Jobs Diagnostic," World Bank Publications - Reports 33317, The World Bank Group.
    2. Maur,Jean-Christophe & Nedeljkovic,Milan & Von Uexkull,Jan Erik, 2022. "FDI and Trade Outcomes at the Industry Level—A Data-Driven Approach," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9901, The World Bank.
    3. Xue, Biao & Lin, Yan & Ren, Fangxiao & Li, Runfo, 2024. "Business environment ecosystem and manufacturing upgrading: A configurational approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1225-1237.
    4. Duarte N. Leite & Sandra T. Silva & Oscar Afonso, 2014. "Institutions, Economics And The Development Quest," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 491-515, July.
    5. Balakrishnan, Karthik & De George, Emmanuel T. & Ertan, Aytekin & Scobie, Hannah, 2021. "Economic consequences of mandatory auditor reporting to bank regulators," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2).
    6. Tamanna Adhikari & Karl Whelan, 2019. "Do Business-Friendly Reforms Boost GDP?," Working Papers 201930, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    7. Arezki,Rabah & Belmejdoub,Oussama & Diab,Bilal & Kalla,Samira & Ha Nguyen & Saif,Abdulla Fahed Abdulla Ali & Yotzov,Ivan Victorov, 2022. "From #Hashtags to Legislation : Engagement and Support for Economic Reforms in the GulfCooperation Council Countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10090, The World Bank.
    8. Adhikari, Tamanna & Whelan, Karl, 2023. "Did raising doing business scores boost GDP?," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 1011-1030.
    9. Djankov, Simeon & Luksic, Igor & Zhang, Eva, 2022. "Technology as deregulation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118882, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Djankov, Simeon & Luksic, Igor & Zhang, Eva (Yiwen), 2022. "Some evidence of regulatory convergence," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    11. Matheus Pereira Libório & Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel & Patrícia Bernardes & Luiz Flávio Autran Monteiro Gomes & Douglas Alexandre Gomes Vieira, 2024. "Specialists’ knowledge and cognitive stress in making pairwise comparisons," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(1), pages 51-70, March.
    12. Alou Adesse Dama & Gregoire Rota-Graziosi & Faycal Sawadogo, 2024. "The regressivity of CIT exemptions in Africa," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 31(3), pages 909-934, June.
    13. Estevão, João & Lopes, José Dias & Penela, Daniela, 2022. "The importance of the business environment for the informal economy: Evidence from the Doing Business ranking," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. Djankov, Simeon & Georgieva, Dorina & Ramalho, Rita, 2018. "Business regulations and poverty," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 82-87.
    15. Arezki, Rabah & Djankov, Simeon & Nguyenc, Ha & Yotzov, Ivan, 2020. "Reform chatter and democracy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118883, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Nicky Rogge & Alena Kolyaseva, 2022. "Measuring and comparing World Bank regions’ ‘ease of doing business’ opportunity sets," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 131-155, April.
    17. Klaus W. Deininger & Thea Hilhorst & Zevenbergen,Jaap & Nkurunziza,Emmanuel, 2025. "Capitalizing on Digital Transformation to Enhance the Effectiveness of Property Institutions : Conceptual Background and Evidence from 85 Countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11100, The World Bank.
    18. Djankov, Simeon & Georgieva, Dorina & Ramalho, Rita, 2017. "Determinants of regulatory reform," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118969, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Andres Irarrazaval, 2023. "The Pillars of Shared Prosperity: Insights From Elite versus State Extraction And From a New Instrument," Working Papers wp549, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    20. Malcolm Rutherford, 2001. "Walton Hamilton, Amherst, and the Brookings Graduate School: Institutonal Economics and Education," Department Discussion Papers 0104, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B15 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aly:journl:202305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Veysel KAYA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/degraus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.