IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ajk/ajkdps/297.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Strategic incentives in intermediary markets: Field-experimental evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Max Thon

    (University of Cologne)

  • Oliver Gürtler

    (University of Cologne)

  • Matthias Heinz

    (University of Cologne)

  • Kai Schäfer

    (University of Cologne)

  • Dirk Sliwka

    (University of Cologne)

Abstract

We investigate how to strategically motivate sales agents in intermediary markets. In collaboration with a large travel company, we run a field experiment with more than 1,200 independently owned intermediaries that sell our study firm’s own products as well as products from competitors to end customers. The intermediaries employ sales agents responsible for customer interaction. We compare the impact of different forms of monetary incentives with non-monetary incentives provided through direct support to reduce the sales agents’ effort costs. We develop a conceptual formal model hypothesizing that incentives for intermediaries (i) generally increase sales, and are more effective when targeting (ii) sales agents rather than owners of the intermediaries, (iii) intermediaries with weaker monetary incentives prior to the intervention, and (iv) products where the firm has no competitive advantage. We find that providing sales-agent support increases sales, while higher commission payments to the agencies’ owners has no discernible effects. Directly incentivizing sales agents through vouchers raises sales for agencies with low prior commission rates. The incentive effects are driven by products where the firm has a weaker market position, while they have no discernible effects on product sales where the firm has a strong competitive advantage. We analyze underlying mechanisms using surveys and further administrative data.

Suggested Citation

  • Max Thon & Oliver Gürtler & Matthias Heinz & Kai Schäfer & Dirk Sliwka, 2024. "Strategic incentives in intermediary markets: Field-experimental evidence," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 297, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econtribute.de/RePEc/ajk/ajkdps/ECONtribute_297_2024.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2024
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Incentives; intermediaries; competitive advantage; strategy; productivity; field experiment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
    • L21 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Business Objectives of the Firm
    • M52 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Compensation and Compensation Methods and Their Effects

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ECONtribute Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.econtribute.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.