IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/waeaar/323732.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Advertised and Instore Specials: A Kinked Oligopoly Demand Theory of Supermarket Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Rudel, R.K.
  • Creek, C.R.
  • Walsh, R.G.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Rudel, R.K. & Creek, C.R. & Walsh, R.G., 1972. "Advertised and Instore Specials: A Kinked Oligopoly Demand Theory of Supermarket Behavior," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 323732, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:waeaar:323732
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.323732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/323732/files/agecon-waea-1086.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.323732?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul M. Sweezy, 1939. "Demand Under Conditions of Oligopoly," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(4), pages 568-568.
    2. R. L. Hall & C. J. Hitch, 1939. "Price Theory And Business Behaviour," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 0(1), pages 12-45.
    3. George J. Stigler, 1947. "The Kinky Oligopoly Demand Curve and Rigid Prices," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 55(5), pages 432-432.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Currarini, Sergio & Marini, Marco, 2011. "Kinked norms of behaviour and cooperation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 110(3), pages 223-225, March.
    2. Stuckey, John A. & Anderson, Jock R., 1974. "Demand Analysis of the Sydney Banana Market," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(01), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Michael Bradfield, 2007. "The Kinked Demand Curve with a Conjectural Hitch – A Micro Extension with Macro Implications," Working Papers daleconwp2007-05, Dalhousie University, Department of Economics.
    4. Sen, Debapriya, 2004. "The kinked demand curve revisited," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 99-105, July.
    5. Adil H. Mouhammed, 2000. "Veblen's Economic Theory: A Radical Analysis," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 32(2), pages 197-221, June.
    6. Ahrens, Steffen & Pirschel, Inske & Snower, Dennis J., 2017. "A theory of price adjustment under loss aversion," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 78-95.
    7. Stéphane Dupraz, 2024. "A Kinked‐Demand Theory of Price Rigidity," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 56(2-3), pages 325-363, March.
    8. Alexander L. Wolman, 2007. "The frequency and costs of individual price adjustment," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 531-552.
    9. Surendra K. Kaushik & William L. Casey Jr., 1982. "The Kinked-Demand Model of Oligopoly: Textbook Departures from the Original Sweezy Model," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 26(2), pages 25-32, October.
    10. Kimolo, Deogratius, 2018. "Price adjustment behaviour of manufacturing and service sector firms in Tanzania: a survey evidence of price stickiness," MPRA Paper 114941, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Luís Cabral, 2016. "Living Up to Expectations: Corporate Reputation and Persistence of Firm Performance," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 2-11, March.
    12. R. Rothschild, 2010. "Kinked Demand Curves," Chapters, in: Mark Blaug & Peter Lloyd (ed.), Famous Figures and Diagrams in Economics, chapter 19, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Stavros, Drakopoulos, 1992. "A Behavioural Approach to Kinked Demand Curves," MPRA Paper 90373, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Pesendorfer, Martin & Gentry, Matthew, 2018. "Price Reference Effects in Consumer Demand," CEPR Discussion Papers 13382, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Rotemberg, Julio J & Saloner, Garth, 1987. "The Relative Rigidity of Monopoly Pricing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 77(5), pages 917-926, December.
    16. Stamatopoulos, Giorgos & Vlassis, Minas, 2012. "Can prices be insensitive to unit cost variations? A game-theoretic alternative to the kinked demand curve explanation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 89-91.
    17. Leo Dobes & Joanne Leung, 2015. "Wider Economic Impacts in Transport Infrastructure Cost-Benefit Analysis - A Bridge Too Far?," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 22(1), pages 75-98.
    18. Timothy J. Richards & Miguel I. Gómez & Iryna Printezis, 2016. "Hysteresis, Price Acceptance, and Reference Prices," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(3), pages 679-706.
    19. Rodolphe Dos Santos Ferreira & Louis-André Gérard-Varet, 2000. "Introduction," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 37(1), pages 7-30.
    20. Cynthia L. Doniger & J. David López-Salido, 2017. "Hysteresis via Endogenous Rigidity in Wages and Participation," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2017-044, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:waeaar:323732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.