IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/waeaar/244851.html

Characteristics of Microcomputer Usage and Determinants of Microcomputer Success in Agribusiness

Author

Listed:
  • Baker, Gregory A.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Baker, Gregory A., 1989. "Characteristics of Microcomputer Usage and Determinants of Microcomputer Success in Agribusiness," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 244851, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:waeaar:244851
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.244851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/244851/files/waea-invitedpapers-013.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.244851?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carroll, Archie B., 1982. "Behavioral aspects of developing computer-based information systems," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 42-51.
    2. Forrest E. Stegelin & James L. Novak, 1986. "Attitudes of agribusiness toward microcomputers," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(2), pages 225-233.
    3. Russell L. Ackoff, 1967. "Management Misinformation Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 147-156, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jörg Mayer & Robert Winter & Thomas Mohr, 2012. "Situational Management Support Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(6), pages 331-345, December.
    2. Giampio Bracchi & Chiara Francalanci, 1997. "A Model for Information Processing Capacity: Formalizing the Impact of Structural and Information System Choices on Organizational Performance," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 173-198, September.
    3. Hau Lee & Seungjin Whang, 1999. "Decentralized Multi-Echelon Supply Chains: Incentives and Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 633-640, May.
    4. Ion Georgiou & Joaquim Heck & Andrej Mrvar, 2019. "The Analysis of Interconnected Decision Areas: A Computational Approach to Finding All Feasible Solutions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 543-563, June.
    5. Nicolas Lesca & Marie-Laurence Caron-Fasan, 2005. "La veille vue comme un système cybernétique," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 8(4), pages 93-120, December.
    6. Mähring, Magnus, 2002. "IT Project Governance: A Process-Oriented Study of Organizational Control and Executive Involvement," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2002:15, Stockholm School of Economics.
    7. Stefan Schweikl & Robert Obermaier, 2020. "Lessons from three decades of IT productivity research: towards a better understanding of IT-induced productivity effects," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 461-507, November.
    8. JS Armstrong, 2005. "Research on Scientific Journals: Implications for Editors and Authors," General Economics and Teaching 0502059, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Bouwens, Jan & Abernethy, Margaret A., 2000. "The consequences of customization on management accounting system design," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 221-241, April.
    10. Ramaprasad, A. & Rai, A., 1996. "Envisioning management of information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 179-193, April.
    11. Justin Benefield & Christopher Cain & Ken Johnson, 2011. "On the Relationship Between Property Price, Time-on-Market, and Photo Depictions in a Multiple Listing Service," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 401-422, October.
    12. George M. Marakas & Joyce J. Elam, 1998. "Semantic Structuring in Analyst Acquisition and Representation of Facts in Requirements Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 37-63, March.
    13. Gelderman, Maarten, 1997. "Task difficulty, task variability and satisfaction with management support systems: consequences and solutions ˜," Serie Research Memoranda 0053, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    14. Eliasson, Gunnar, 2005. "The nature of economic change and management in a new knowledge based information economy," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 428-456, October.
    15. Jackson, Thomas W. & Farzaneh, Pourya, 2012. "Theory-based model of factors affecting information overload," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 523-532.
    16. Rita Di Mascio, 2016. "Firms’ adoption of self-service technology: how managerial beliefs shape co-production decisions," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 6(1), pages 79-97, June.
    17. John W. Boudreau, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: Organizational Behavior, Strategy, Performance, and Design in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1463-1476, November.
    18. Sivadasan, Suja & Smart, Janet & Huaccho Huatuco, Luisa & Calinescu, Anisoara, 2013. "Reducing schedule instability by identifying and omitting complexity-adding information flows at the supplier–customer interface," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 253-262.
    19. Derbez, Luis E., 1980. "Econometric modeling and decision support systems: an applied exercise for a Mexican firm," ISU General Staff Papers 198001010800008322, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    20. Radhakrishnan, Abirami & Davis, John Stephen & Sridharan, Sri V. & Moore, De Wayne & David, Dessa, 2018. "The impact of inter-organizational information systems-enabled external integration on capabilities of buyer–supplier dyads," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 558-572.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:waeaar:244851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.