IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v145y2013i1p253-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing schedule instability by identifying and omitting complexity-adding information flows at the supplier–customer interface

Author

Listed:
  • Sivadasan, Suja
  • Smart, Janet
  • Huaccho Huatuco, Luisa
  • Calinescu, Anisoara

Abstract

Within the supply chain context, schedule instability is caused by revisions to forecast demand from customers, problems with scheduled deliveries from suppliers, and disruptions to internal production. Supply chain partners attempt to address schedule instability by regular exchanges of information flows on current demand and delivery forecasts. However, if these updating information flows are unreliable and likely to be over-ridden by subsequent updated schedules, then the problem of schedule instability at the supplier–customer interface is not being solved. The research hypothesis investigated in this paper is whether supply chain partners may reduce schedule instability at the supplier–customer interface by identifying and omitting complexity-adding information flows. To this aim, previous work by the authors on an information-theoretic methodology for measuring complexity is extended and applied in this paper for identifying complexity-adding information flows. The application consists of comparing the complexity index of actual exchanged information flows with the complexity index of scenarios that omit one or more of these information flows. Using empirical results, it is shown that supply chain partners may reduce schedule instability at the supplier–customer interface by identifying and omitting complexity-adding information flows. The applied methodology is independent of the information systems used by the supplier and customer, and it provides an objective, integrative measure of schedule instability at the supplier–customer interface. Two case studies are presented, one in the commodity production environment of fast-moving consumer goods, and another in the customised production environment of electronic products sector. By applying the measurement and analysis methodology, relevant schedule instability-related insights about the specific case-studies are obtained. In light of the findings from these case studies, areas for further research and validation of the conditions in which the proposed research hypothesis holds are also proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sivadasan, Suja & Smart, Janet & Huaccho Huatuco, Luisa & Calinescu, Anisoara, 2013. "Reducing schedule instability by identifying and omitting complexity-adding information flows at the supplier–customer interface," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 253-262.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:145:y:2013:i:1:p:253-262
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527313002077
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hau L. Lee & Kut C. So & Christopher S. Tang, 2000. "The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(5), pages 626-643, May.
    2. de Kok, Ton & Inderfurth, Karl, 1997. "Nervousness in inventory management: Comparison of basic control rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 55-82, November.
    3. Kelle, Peter & Akbulut, Asli, 2005. "The role of ERP tools in supply chain information sharing, cooperation, and cost optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 41-52, January.
    4. S C L Koh, 2004. "MRP-controlled batch-manufacturing environment under uncertainty," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(3), pages 219-232, March.
    5. van Donselaar, K. H. & Gubbels, B. J., 2002. "How to release orders in order to minimise system inventory and system nervousness?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 335-343, August.
    6. Wu, Y. & Frizelle, G. & Efstathiou, J., 2007. "A study on the cost of operational complexity in customer-supplier systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 217-229, March.
    7. Joseph D. Blackburn & Dean H. Kropp & Robert A. Millen, 1986. "A Comparison of Strategies to Dampen Nervousness in MRP Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 413-429, April.
    8. Sivadasan, S. & Efstathiou, J. & Calinescu, A. & Huatuco, L. Huaccho, 2006. "Advances on measuring the operational complexity of supplier-customer systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(1), pages 208-226, May.
    9. Russell L. Ackoff, 1967. "Management Misinformation Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 147-156, December.
    10. Mason-Jones, Rachel & Towill, Denis R., 1999. "Total cycle time compression and the agile supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 61-73, May.
    11. Gloria Rodríguez-Verjan & Jairo R. Montoya-Torres, 2009. "Measuring the Impact of Supplier-Customer Information Sharing on Production Scheduling," International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), IGI Global, vol. 2(2), pages 48-61, April.
    12. Mula, J. & Poler, R. & Garcia-Sabater, J.P. & Lario, F.C., 2006. "Models for production planning under uncertainty: A review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 271-285, September.
    13. Arnd Huchzermeier & Christoph H. Loch, 2001. "Project Management Under Risk: Using the Real Options Approach to Evaluate Flexibility in R...D," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 85-101, January.
    14. Martinez-Olvera, Cesar, 2008. "Entropy as an assessment tool of supply chain information sharing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 405-417, February.
    15. Childerhouse, P. & Disney, S.M. & Towill, D.R., 2008. "On the impact of order volatility in the European automotive sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 2-13, July.
    16. Koh, S.C. Lenny & Saad, Sameh M., 2006. "Managing uncertainty in ERP-controlled manufacturing environments in SMEs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 109-127, May.
    17. van Donselaar, K. & van den Nieuwenhof, J. & Visschers, J., 2000. "The impact of material coordination concepts on planning stability in supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 169-176, November.
    18. Stadtler, Hartmut, 2005. "Supply chain management and advanced planning--basics, overview and challenges," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(3), pages 575-588, June.
    19. Al-Mudimigh, Abdullah S. & Zairi, Mohamed & Ahmed, Abdel Moneim M., 2004. "Extending the concept of supply chain:: The effective management of value chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 309-320, February.
    20. van der Sluis, Erik, 1993. "Reducing system nervousness in multi-product inventory systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 551-562, July.
    21. Blackburn, Joseph D. & Kropp, Dean H. & Millen, Robert A., 1985. "MRP system nervousness: Causes and cures," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1-3), pages 141-146, April.
    22. Gérard P. Cachon & Marshall Fisher, 2000. "Supply Chain Inventory Management and the Value of Shared Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(8), pages 1032-1048, August.
    23. Narayanan, Arunachalam & Robinson, Powell, 2010. "Evaluation of joint replenishment lot-sizing procedures in rolling horizon planning systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 85-94, September.
    24. Bartezzaghi, Emilio & Verganti, Roberto, 1995. "Managing demand uncertainty through order overplanning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2-3), pages 107-120, August.
    25. Theodore H. Clark & Janice H. Hammond, 1997. "Reengineering Channel Reordering Processes To Improve Total Supply‐Chain Performance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 6(3), pages 248-265, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caridi, Maria & Crippa, Luca & Perego, Alessandro & Sianesi, Andrea & Tumino, Angela, 2010. "Do virtuality and complexity affect supply chain visibility?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 372-383, October.
    2. S. O. Namusonge & Prof. E. Mukulu & Dr. N. Kirima, 2015. "Information Sharing, Cooperative Behaviour and Hotel Performance: A Survey of the Kenyan Hospitality Industry," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 5(9), pages 77-92, September.
    3. Hau L. Lee & V. Padmanabhan & Seungjin Whang, 2004. "Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect"," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1887-1893, December.
    4. Fawcett, Stanley E. & Magnan, Gregory M. & McCarter, Matthew W., 2005. "The Effect of People on the Supply Chain World: Some Overlooked Issues," Working Papers 05-0118, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    5. Welker, Gera A. & van der Vaart, Taco & Pieter van Donk, Dirk, 2008. "The influence of business conditions on supply chain information-sharing mechanisms: A study among supply chain links of SMEs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 706-720, June.
    6. Baruah, Pundarikaksha, 2006. "Supply Chains Facing Atypical Demand: Optimal Operational Policies And Benefits Under Information Sharing," MPRA Paper 16101, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Sodhi, ManMohan S. & Tang, Christopher S., 2009. "Modeling supply-chain planning under demand uncertainty using stochastic programming: A survey motivated by asset-liability management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 728-738, October.
    8. Ketzenberg, Michael E. & Rosenzweig, Eve D. & Marucheck, Ann E. & Metters, Richard D., 2007. "A framework for the value of information in inventory replenishment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(3), pages 1230-1250, November.
    9. Rajiv D. Banker & Robert J. Kauffman, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: The Evolution of Research on Information Systems: A Fiftieth-Year Survey of the Literature in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 281-298, March.
    10. Li Chen & Hau L. Lee, 2009. "Information Sharing and Order Variability Control Under a Generalized Demand Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 781-797, May.
    11. Michael J. Fry & Roman Kapuscinski & Tava Lennon Olsen, 2001. "Coordinating Production and Delivery Under a (z, Z)-Type Vendor-Managed Inventory Contract," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 151-173, August.
    12. Demirel, Edil & Özelkan, Ertunga C. & Lim, Churlzu, 2018. "Aggregate planning with Flexibility Requirements Profile," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 45-58.
    13. Caridi, Maria & Moretto, Antonella & Perego, Alessandro & Tumino, Angela, 2014. "The benefits of supply chain visibility: A value assessment model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-19.
    14. Mula, Josefa & Peidro, David & Poler, Raul, 2010. "The effectiveness of a fuzzy mathematical programming approach for supply chain production planning with fuzzy demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 136-143, November.
    15. Li, Tian & Zhang, Hongtao, 2015. "Information sharing in a supply chain with a make-to-stock manufacturer," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 115-125.
    16. Susan Cohen Kulp & Hau L. Lee & Elie Ofek, 2004. "Manufacturer Benefits from Information Integration with Retail Customers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 431-444, April.
    17. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Sethi, Suresh, 2010. "Innovative quick response programs: A review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 1-12, September.
    18. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    19. Chu, Wai Hung Julius & Lee, Ching Chyi, 2006. "Strategic information sharing in a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(3), pages 1567-1579, November.
    20. S. O. Namusonge & Prof. E. Mukulu & Dr. N. Kirima, 2015. "Information Sharing, Cooperative Behaviour and Hotel Performance: A Survey of the Kenyan Hospitality Industry," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 5(9), pages 77-92, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:145:y:2013:i:1:p:253-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.