IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Cow-Calf Operations in the Southeastern United States: An Analysis of Farm Characteristics and Production Risks

Listed author(s):
  • Adkins, Tracey S.
  • Riley, John Michael
  • Little, Randall D.
  • Coatney, Kalyn T.

Beef cattle production in the southeastern United States differs in size, practice, and production type from other U.S. regions. Smaller, cow-calf type operations dominate in this region because the climate, forage availability, and other land use practices of farmers make this type of cattle operation more ideal for the Southeast. Cow-calf production, particularly small-herd enterprises, does not typically require the level of intense management compared to other beef operations, thus making it more manageable for those with limited time and labor. This research summarizes the current practices and characteristics that define the Southeastern cow-calf operation as it operates under the new challenges of today’s market and operating environment; it also examines the factors that influence the variability of beef production in these operations. Results are gathered from functioning cattle ranches in the Southeast. This research provides an empirical definition of beef cattle operations in the southeastern U.S. and compares cattle operations in the Southeast to other regions of the country. It also examines factors of cattle production and the practices that affect that production. Results of the analysis indicate the following major points: 1.) Only 53% of all respondents that owned commercial cows have fewer than 50 head and almost 73% of respondents with cattle have seedstock operations with fewer than 50 head. 2.) Older calves weigh more at weaning and the variability around the mean tends to widen as calves get older. 3.) Seedstock producers, likely due to the genetic nature of a purebred herd, produce calves that wean at higher weights than those crossbred calves that are typical of cow-calf operations. 4.) Operators that are financially invested in their operation, through the amount of income they receive and the amount of financial investment they have made, seem to be more attentive to the outcome of their production process.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Southern Agricultural Economics Association in its series 2012 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2012, Birmingham, Alabama with number 119757.

in new window

Date of creation: 2012
Handle: RePEc:ags:saea12:119757
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Little, Randall D. & Forrest, Charlie S. & Lacy, R. Curt, 2000. "Cattle Producer Attitudes Towards Alternative Production And Marketing Practices," Research reports 15792, Mississippi State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
  2. Ramsey, Ruslyn & Doye, Damona G. & Ward, Clement E. & McGrann, James M. & Falconer, Lawrence L. & Bevers, Stanley J., 2005. "Factors Affecting Beef Cow-Herd Costs, Production, and Profits," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 37(01), April.
  3. McBride, William D. & Mathews, Kenneth H., Jr., 2011. "The Diverse Structure and Organization of U.S. Beef Cow-Calf Farms," Economic Information Bulletin 102764, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saea12:119757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.