IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/quedwp/273821.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tenure Insecurity, Adverse Selection, and Liquidity in Rural Land Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Stacey, Derek

Abstract

A theory of land market activity is developed for settings where there is uncertainty and private information about the security of land tenure. Land sellers match with buyers in a competitive search environment, and an illiquid land market emerges as a screening mechanism. As a consequence, adverse selection and an insecure system of property rights stifle land market transactions. The implications of the theory are tested using household level data from Indonesia. As predicted, formally titled land is more liquid than untitled land in the sense that ownership rights are more readily trans- ferable. Additional implications of the theory are verified empirically by constructing a proxy variable for land tenure security and studying the differences between markets for unregistered land across Indonesian provinces. Regional land market activity is appropriately linked to the distribution of the proxy variable.

Suggested Citation

  • Stacey, Derek, 2011. "Tenure Insecurity, Adverse Selection, and Liquidity in Rural Land Markets," Queen's Economics Department Working Papers 273821, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:quedwp:273821
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.273821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/273821/files/qed_wp_1269.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.273821?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:quedwp:273821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.