Market Freeze and Recovery: Trading Dynamics under Optimal Intervention by a Market-Maker-of-Last-Resort
In the context of a search model of asset trading with adverse selection, we demonstrate that trading of a financial asset will cease, when its average quality drops sufficiently. A large player, however, can establish trading again, if he removes a sufficiently large quantity of bad assets which involves assuming losses. Most importantly, we show that such a player does not have to intervene immediately: a mere announcement today of intervening in the future can cause markets to function again. This announcement effect gives rise to a trade-off between the size and the timing of the intervention. The optimal policy balances the (social) costs of transfers against the costs of illiquid markets. If the former are small, it is optimal to ensure that markets function continuously. This is optimally achieved by intervening immediately, but at a minimum scale. When the costs of transfers increase, it is however optimal to delay the intervention and increase its size.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||2010|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.EconomicDynamics.org/society.htmEmail:
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed010:78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Zimmermann)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.