IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/auu/hpaper/046.html

After 200 years, why is Indonesia’s cadastral system still incomplete?

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre van der Eng

Abstract

This paper discusses Indonesia’s experience with establishing a uniform cadastral system in rural areas since the idea was first mooted in the early 19th century. Until 1961, a formal cadastre that identified, measured, registered and certified land titles existed only in urban areas. A cadastre for rural land did not start until after the 1960 Agrarian Law. Until then, the village-based land tax registers acted as a substitute cadastral register in areas subject to land tax. In the 19th century, this system was imperfect and calls to resolve issues of inequity in tax assessment led to improvements, especially since 1907. A proper rural cadastre was not introduced during the colonial era, because of the high cost involved, and because its certification of individual land rights would have clashed with customary regulations, including notions of communal land tenure. The introduction of a rural cadastre after 1960 was piecemeal, and the use of property tax registration as a substitute cadastre has continued. By 1992 cadastre registrations covered just 20% of land plots, mostly in urban areas. A World Bank-sponsored project helped to increased coverage since 1994 to 32% in 2013. Greater coverage was delayed by the rapid increase in newly opened up agricultural areas, the cost of land title certificates, the difficulties of reconciling individual land ownership with customary regulations, and also the continued use of property tax registers as a substitute cadastre.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre van der Eng, 2016. "After 200 years, why is Indonesia’s cadastral system still incomplete?," CEH Discussion Papers 046, Centre for Economic History, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
  • Handle: RePEc:auu:hpaper:046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cbe.anu.edu.au/researchpapers/CEH/WP201603.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard M. Bird & Enid Slack (ed.), 2004. "International Handbook of Land and Property Taxation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3304.
    2. Stacey, Derek, 2011. "Tenure Insecurity, Adverse Selection, and Liquidity in Rural Land Markets," Queen's Economics Department Working Papers 273821, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
    3. Michael Grimm & Stephan Klasen, 2015. "Migration Pressure, Tenure Security, and Agricultural Intensification: Evidence from Indonesia," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 91(3), pages 411-434.
    4. Paul Castañeda Dower & Elizabeth Potamites, 2014. "Signalling Creditworthiness: Land Titles, Banking Practices, and Formal Credit In Indonesia," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 435-459, December.
    5. Pierre van der Eng, 2006. "Surplus mobilisation in farm agriculture: A comparison of Java and Japan, 1870-1940," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 35-58.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Trias Aditya & Eva Maria-Unger & Christelle vd Berg & Rohan Bennett & Paul Saers & Han Lukman Syahid & Doni Erwan & Tjeerd Wits & Nurrohmat Widjajanti & Purnama Budi Santosa & Dedi Atunggal & Imam Han, 2020. "Participatory Land Administration in Indonesia: Quality and Usability Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Aditya, Trias & Santosa, Purnama Budi & Yulaikhah, Yulaikhah & Widjajanti, Nurrohmat & Atunggal, Dedi & Sulistyawati, Miranty, 2021. "Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Franklin Obeng-Odoom, 2018. "Valuing unregistered urban land in Indonesia," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 315-340, December.
    2. Dieter Gstach, 2009. "A Property Taxation Mechanism With Self‐Assessment," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 400-408, July.
    3. Kubitza, Christoph & Krishna, Vijesh V. & Urban, Kira & Alamsyah, Zulkifli & Qaim, Matin, 2018. "Land Property Rights, Agricultural Intensification, and Deforestation in Indonesia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 312-321.
    4. Slack, Enid, 2007. "Managing the coordination of service delivery in metropolitan cities : the role of metropolitan governance," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4317, The World Bank.
    5. Roy Kelly, 2004. "Property Tax Reform in Indonesia: Emerging Challenges from Decentralisation," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 71-90, June.
    6. repec:ays:ispwps:paper1311 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Roy Bahl & Richard M. Bird, 2014. "Decentralization and Infrastructure: Principles and Practice," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1408, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    8. Denis Nitikin & Chunli Shen & Qian Wang & Heng-fu Zou, 2011. "Land Taxation in China: Assessment of Prospects for Politically and Economically Sustainable Reform," CEMA Working Papers 431, China Economics and Management Academy, Central University of Finance and Economics.
    9. Cristian Sepulveda & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, 2012. "Explaining property tax collections in developing countries: the case of Latin America," Chapters, in: Giorgio Brosio & Juan P. Jiménez (ed.), Decentralization and Reform in Latin America, chapter 7, pages iii-iii, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Awasthi,Rajul & Le,Tuan Minh & You,Chenli, 2020. "Determinants of Property Tax Revenue : Lessons from Empirical Analysis," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9399, The World Bank.
    11. Bonnet, Odran & Chapelle, Guillaume & Trannoy, Alain & Wasmer, Etienne, 2021. "Land is back, it should be taxed, it can be taxed," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    12. Katrina Connolly & Michael Bell, 2010. "Financing Urban Government in Transition Countries: Assessment Uniformity and the Property Tax," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 28(6), pages 978-991, December.
    13. Kalkuhl, Matthias & Fernandez Milan, Blanca & Schwerhoff, Gregor & Jakob, Michael & Hahnen, Maren & Creutzig, Felix, 2017. "Fiscal Instruments for Sustainable Development: The Case of Land Taxes," MPRA Paper 78652, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Richard M. Bird, 2018. "Are global taxes feasible?," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(5), pages 1372-1400, October.
    15. Richard M. Bird, 2008. "Tax Challenges Facing Developing Countries," Working Papers id:1618, eSocialSciences.
    16. Aloysius Gunadi BRATA, 2021. "The Influence Of Colonial Railways On Java Economic Geography," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(2), pages 39-54, May.
    17. Kacana Sipangule, 2017. "Agribusinesses, smallholder tenure security, and plot-level investments: Evidence from rural Tanzania," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-106, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Juanita Villaveces, 2014. "Is [Rural] Property Tax Relevant?," Documentos de Trabajo 11527, Universidad del Rosario.
    19. Harvey SCHWARTZ, 2008. "Municipal Finance in Transitional Countries," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 2008-2.
    20. Löffler, Max & Siegloch, Sebastian, 2015. "Property Taxation, Local Labor Markets and Rental Housing," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 112967, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    21. Burzec, Marcin, 2015. "Koncepcje opodatkowania nieruchomości rolnych w wybranych krajach europejskich – wnioski dla Polski," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 4(169).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • N55 - Economic History - - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment and Extractive Industries - - - Asia including Middle East
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • R52 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Land Use and Other Regulations

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:auu:hpaper:046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/chanuau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.