IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/333171.html

Evaluating a Simple Method for Estimating Sub-National Trade Flows

Author

Listed:
  • Hallren, Ross

Abstract

Given the non-uniform distribution of industrial activity within a country, it is well-established that the effects from changes in trade policy have considerable sub-national heterogeneity. (Andriamananjara, Balistreri and Ross (2006), Balistreri, Bohringer, and Rutherford (2018), and Caceres, Cerdeiro, and Mano (2019)) For industry specific, partial equilibrium analysis, a gravity model based approach, as in Riker (2019), is potentially the most tractable method for time-sensitive analysis because it relies on readily available national accounts and import data to estimate sub-national flows. In this paper, we utilize Japanese inter-prefectural trade flow data from the Japanese inter-regional input-output table from 2005, the most recent year available, to evaluate the estimation method proposed in Riker (2019). In the first round results, we find that the gravity model based method approximates the observed inter-prefectural flow pat-tern reported in the 2005 Japan inter-regional input-output table, but only after tuning of the trade cost parameters. The main challenge is the lack of trade publicly available Japanese import trade margin data.

Suggested Citation

  • Hallren, Ross, 2020. "Evaluating a Simple Method for Estimating Sub-National Trade Flows," Conference papers 333171, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333171/files/9792.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward Balistreri & Christoph Boehringer & Thomas Rutherford, 2025. "Quantifying Disruptive Trade Policies," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 10(1), pages 1-49, June.
    2. Horridge, Mark & Madden, John & Wittwer, Glyn, 2005. "The impact of the 2002-2003 drought on Australia," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 285-308, April.
    3. Polenske, Karen R, 1970. "An Empirical Test of Interregional Input-Output Models: Estimation of 1963 Japanese Production," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 60(2), pages 76-82, May.
    4. Andriamananjara, Soamiely & Balistreri, Edward J. & Ross, Martin T., 2006. "State-level equity and the demise of the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 17-33, March.
    5. Carlos Caceres & Mr. Diego A. Cerdeiro & Rui Mano, 2019. "Trade Wars and Trade Deals: Estimated Effects using a Multi-Sector Model," IMF Working Papers 2019/143, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bekkers, Eddy & Schroeter, Sofia, 2020. "An economic analysis of the US-China trade conflict," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2020-04, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    2. Lionel Fontagné & Cecilia Bellora, 2019. "Shooting oneself in the foot? US trade policy coping with Global Value Chains," Post-Print hal-02128135, HAL.
    3. Gabela, Julio Gustavo Fournier, 2020. "On the accuracy of gravity-RAS approaches used for inter-regional trade estimation: evidence using the 2005 inter-regional input–output table of Japan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 521-539.
    4. Laurence Wicht, 2019. "The impact of trade tensions on Switzerland: A quantitative assessment," Aussenwirtschaft, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science, Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economics Research, vol. 70(01), pages 1-34, December.
    5. de Souza Ferreira Filho, Joaquim Bento & Bacha, Carlos José Caetano & Regazzini, Leonardo Coviello, 2021. "Tax exemption in Brazil in 2009: why vehicles and not agriculture? An interregional general equilibrium analysis," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    6. Masato Yamazaki & Atsushi Koike & Yoshinori Sone, 2018. "A Heuristic Approach to the Estimation of Key Parameters for a Monthly, Recursive, Dynamic CGE Model," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 283-301, October.
    7. Pham Phuong Ngoc & Dainn Wie, 2025. "Fishing in Troubled Waters: The Impact of the US-China Trade War on Vietnam," GRIPS Discussion Papers 23-06, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    8. Verikios, George & Zhang, Xiao-guang, 2015. "Reform of Australian urban transport: A CGE-microsimulation analysis of the effects on income distribution," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 7-17.
    9. Rudi Purwono & Unggul Heriqbaldi & Miguel Angel Esquivias & M. Khoerul Mubin, 2022. "The American–China Trade War and Spillover Effects on Value-Added Exports from Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Arief Anshory Yusuf & Mark Horridge & Edimon Ginting & Priasto Aji, 2014. "Reducing disparity through a regions-focused development: A modeling approach of assessing the Indonesian MP3EI," Working Papers in Economics and Development Studies (WoPEDS) 201402, Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University, revised Feb 2014.
    11. Bonfiglio, Andrea, 2006. "The Impact of Romania's Accession to the EU. An Analysis of the Effects of Regional Development Policy Through a Multi-regional I-O Model," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Andrzej Torój, 2016. "Regional Economic Impact Assessment with Missing Input-Output Data: A Spatial Econometrics Approach for Poland," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 8(2), pages 61-91, June.
    13. Francois J. Stofberg & Jan H. van Heerden, 2015. "The Short Term Economic Impact of Levying E-Tolls on Industries," Working Papers 201527, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    14. John M. Crespi & Tina L. Saitone, 2019. "Has Specialization Put a Limit on How Far Cattle Contracting Can Go?," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-winter-2019-1, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    15. Simone Cigna & Philipp Meinen & Patrick Schulte & Nils Steinhoff, 2022. "The impact of US tariffs against China on US imports: Evidence for trade diversion?," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(1), pages 162-173, January.
    16. Tran, Nhi & Roos, Louise & Giesecke, James & Madden, John, 2015. "Regionally targeted migration policy as an instrument for regional development: a general equilibrium assessment," Conference papers 332608, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    17. Haiou Mao & Holger Görg, 2020. "Friends like this: The impact of the US–China trade war on global value chains," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(7), pages 1776-1791, July.
    18. Francois Jacobus Stofberg & Jan Van Heerden, 2016. "The Short-Term Economic Impact of Levying E-Tolls on Industries," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 84(4), pages 574-593, December.
    19. Jendrzejewski, Błażej, 2020. "Bioeconomic modelling – An application of environmentally adjusted economic accounts and the computable general equilibrium model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Mr. Eugenio M Cerutti & Shan Chen & Mr. Pragyan Deb & Albe Gjonbalaj & Mrs. Swarnali A Hannan & Mr. Adil Mohommad, 2019. "Managed Trade: What Could be Possible Spillover Effects of a Potential Trade Agreement Between the U.S. and China?," IMF Working Papers 2019/251, International Monetary Fund.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.